Resumen

Michael Peters writes “Wittgenstein’s Antifoundationalism: a response to Cristiane Maria Cornelia Gottschalk” to assert that one is always indebted to those who take their work seriously and engage in serious disputes over readings and arguments. For Petters, Cristiane Gottschalk advances in three aspects of disagreement: (i) the appropriation of Wittgenstein’s philosophy by analytic philosophers of education; (ii) the status of Wittgenstein’s spelling dictionary; and (iii) Wittgenstein's anti-foundationalism. Thus, he discusses and presents his arguments on the three arguments in his text.