Correct-incorrect proportional reasoning strategies on the proportional problems and solo taxonomy
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Parameswari, Pradina, Purwanto, Sudirman y Susiswo
Resumen
Proportional reasoning strategies are needed in solving comparison problems. Previous study still being researched on proportional problems in general. Therefore, this study examines the correct-incorrect strategies in solving direct proportion and inverse proportion problems. Students’ responses were analyzed using the SOLO taxonomy framework. Objectives: This study aims to describe students' forms of proportional reasoning strategies when solving proportional problems and their SOLO taxonomy level. Design: A descriptive approach with a qualitative type. Setting and Participants: 103 students at10th grade who can communicate their answers clearly and fluently during interviews. Data collection and analysis: Data is collected through comparative problem tests and interviews. The data were analyzed based on the proportional reasoning strategy and the SOLO taxonomy level. Results: The correct strategy used is the proportional reasoning strategy for inverse proportion problem. Cross multiplication strategy and systematic strategy for direct proportion problem. The incorrect strategies include: non-proportional and cross multiplication (intuitive and additive) strategies. Students’ response levels based on the SOLO taxonomy: Students who can answer all the problems correctly are at the relational level, students who only partially answer correctly are at the pre-structural and relational levels, and students who cannot answer all the problems given are at the uni-structural level. Conclusions: The results of this study describe the forms of students' proportional reasoning strategies followed by the SOLO taxonomy level so that in the future, these results can be followed up by other researchers to be able to provide solutions related to the incorrect strategies used by students.
Fecha
2023
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Comprensión | Otro (razonamiento) | Proporcionalidad | Resolución de problemas | Tipos de metodología
Enfoque
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Usuario
Volumen
25
Número
5
Rango páginas (artículo)
86-117
ISSN
21787727
Referencias
Adeniji, S. M., Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review Acta Sci. (Canoas), 25(5), 86-117, Sep./Oct. 2023 113 of research in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12087 Ahl, L. M. (2019). Designing a research-based detection test for eliciting students’ prior understanding on proportional reasoning. Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal, 14(1), 6–22. Andini, W., & Jupri, A. (2017). Student Obstacles in Ratio and Proportion Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012048 Ari, A. (2013). Bilissel Alan Siniflamasinda Yenilenmis Bloom, SOLO, Fink, Dettmer Taksonomileri. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.12780/uusbd164 Arican, M. (2019). Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of and Abilities to Differentiate Proportional Relationships from Nonproportional Relationships. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1423–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9931-x Arican, M., & Kiymaz, Y. (2022). Investigating Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Definitions, Formulas, and Graphs of Directly and Inversely Proportional Relationships. Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 632–656. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1566 Artut, P. D., & Pelen, M. S. (2015). 6th Grade Students’ Solution Strategies on Proportional Reasoning Problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.066 Avcu, R., & Doğan, M. (2014). What Are the Strategies Used by Seventh Grade Students While Solving Proportional Reasoning Problems? International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(2), 34– 55. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.2014.02.003 Ayan, R., & Isiksal-Bostan, M. (2019). Middle school students’ proportional reasoning in real life contexts in the domain of geometry and measurement. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1468042 Beckmann, S., & Izsák, A. (2015). Two perspectives on proportional 114 Acta Sci. (Canoas), 25(5), 86-117, Sep./Oct. 2023 relationships: Extending complementary origins of multiplication in terms of quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0017 Bintara, I. A., & Suhendra. (2021). Analysis toward learning obstacles of junior high school students on the topic of direct and inverse proportion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012083 Buforn, À., Llinares, S., Fernández, C., Coles, A., & Brown, L. (2022). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of the unitizing process in recognizing students’ reasoning to propose teaching decisions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1777333 Burgos, M., & Godino, J. D. (2022). Assessing the Epistemic Analysis Competence of Prospective Primary School Teachers on Proportionality Tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10143-0 Cabero-Fayos, I., Santágueda-Villanueva, M., Villalobos-Antúnez, J. V., & Roig-Albiol, A. I. (2020). Understanding of inverse proportional reasoning in pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 10(11), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110308 Çalışıcı, H. (2018). Middle school students’ learning difficulties in the ratioproportion topic and a suggested solution: Envelope technique. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(8), 1848–1855. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060830 Castillo, S., & Fernandez, C. (2022). Secondary School Students ’ Performances on Ratio Comparison Problems. Acta Scientiae, 4, 60–87. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6834 Cebola, G., & Brocardo, J. (2021). Model of flexibility in the conceptual evolution of multiplicative comparison. Acta Scientiae, 23(6), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6604 Dole, S., Hilton, A., & Hilton, G. (2015). Proportional reasoning as essential numeracy. In: Mathematics Education in the Margins (Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), 189–196. Dooren, W. Van, Bock, D. De, Evers, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Students’ Acta Sci. (Canoas), 25(5), 86-117, Sep./Oct. 2023 115 overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems: how numbers may change solutions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 187–211. Dougherty, B., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Shin, M. (2016). Helping Students With Mathematics Difficulties Understand Ratios and Proportions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916674897 Doyle, K., Dias, O., Kennis, J., Czarnocha, B., & Baker, W. (2016). The Rational Number Sub-Constructs as a Foundation for Problem Solving. Adults Learning Mathematics, 11(1), 21–42. Glassmeyer, D., Brakoniecki, A., & Amador, J. M. (2021). Identifying and supporting teachers’ robust understanding of proportional reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62(April), 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100873 Hilton, A., Hilton, G., Dole, S., & Goos, M. (2016). Promoting middle school students’ proportional reasoning skills through an ongoing professional development programme for teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9694- 7 Im, S. H., & Jitendra, A. K. (2020). Analysis of Proportional Reasoning and Misconceptions Among Students with Mathematical Learning Disabilities. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57(March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100753 Irfan, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Sisworo. (2020). Students know the concept but are incorrect in solving the proportional problem: How does it happen? International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 27(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327- 7971/CGP/v27i02/1-12 Johar, R., Yusniarti, S., & Saminan. (2018). The analysis of proportional reasoning problem in the Indonesian mathematics textbook for the junior high school. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4145.55-68 Kahraman, H., Kul, E., & Iskenderoglu, T. A. (2019). 7. ve 8. Sinif Ogrencilerinin Nicel Karşilaştirma Iceren Orantisal Akil Yürütme Problemlerinde Kullandiklari Stratejiler. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 195–216. 116 Acta Sci. (Canoas), 25(5), 86-117, Sep./Oct. 2023 https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.333046 Karli, M. G., & Yildiz, E. (2022). Incorrect Strategies Developed by SeventhGrade Students to Solve Proportional Reasoning Problems. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 22(29), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.29.5 Koçyiğit, Ş., & Moralı, H. S. (2020). Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarinin Soyut Matematik Dersindeki Bilgilerinin Math Taksonomi Çerçevesinde Analizi* Analysis of Abstract Mathematics Knowledge of Mathematics Teacher Trainees Through MATH Taxonomy. 3(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/ 10.25272/j.2149-8385.2020.6.2.05 Kontogianni, A., & Tatsis, K. (2019). Proportional Reasoning of Adult Students in a Second Chance School: The Subconstructs of Fractions. Adults Learning Mathematics, 14(2), 23–38. Li, Y., Chen, S., & Chen, H. (2022). Study on the Logical Reasoning Ability Development of Junior High School Students Based on SOLO Taxonomy. Research and Advances in Education, 1(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2022.08.01 Lundberg, A. L. V., & Kilhamn, C. (2018). Transposition of Knowledge: Encountering Proportionality in an Algebra Task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9781-3 Özdemir, A. Ş., & Yildiz*, S. G. (2015). The Analysis of Elementary Mathematics Preservice Teachers’ Spatial Orientation Skills with SOLO Model. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(61), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.12 Öztürk, M., Demir, Ü., & Akkan, Y. (2021). Investigation of Proportional Reasoning Problem Solving Processes of Seventh Grade Students: A Mixed Method Research. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 3(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.66 Perumal, V. a/p, & Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2022). Conceptions of Ratio and Proportions among Year Five Pupils: Case Study. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 11–23. Phuong, N. T., & Loc, N. P. (2020). Solving Word Problems Involving “Ratio” Concept of The Fifth - Grade Students: A Study in Vietnam. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 2937–2945. Acta Sci. (Canoas), 25(5), 86-117, Sep./Oct. 2023 117 https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080722 Pişkin Tunç, M., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2022). Fostering prospective mathematics teachers’ proportional reasoning through a practice-based instruction. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1844909 Thurn, C., Nussbaumer, D., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2022). The Role of Prior Knowledge and Intelligence in Gaining from a Training on Proportional Reasoning. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020031 Tjoe, H., & de la Torre, J. (2014). The identification and validation process of proportional reasoning attributes: An application of a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0090-7 Tunç, M. P. (2020). Investigation of Middle School Students’ Solution Strategies in Solving Proportional and Non-proportional Problems. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16949/TURKBILMAT.560349 Vanluydt, E., Supply, A. S., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2021). The Importance of Specific Mathematical Language for Early Proportional Reasoning. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.12.003 Weiland, T., Orrill, C. H., Nagar, G. G., Brown, R. E., & Burke, J. (2021). Framing a Robust Understanding of Proportional Reasoning for Teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0
Proyectos
Cantidad de páginas
32