La perspectiva enactivista en educación matemática: todo hacer es conocer

Referencias

Artigue, M., M. Bartolini Bussi, T. Dreyfus, E. Gray y S. Prediger (2005), “Different theoretical perspectives and approaches in research in mathematics education”, Proceedings from cerme 4, Working group 11, pp. 1239-1243, http://www.mathematik.uni-dort-mund.de/~erme/CERME4/CERME4_WG11.pdf#page=3, [12-05-13]. Bach-y-Rita, P. (1962), Brain Mechanisms in Sensory Substitution, Nueva York, Academic Press. Bateson, G. (1979), Mind and Nature, Nueva York, Dutton. ————— (1987), “Men are Grass: Metaphor and the World of Mental Process”, en W. I. Thompson (ed.), GAIA, A Way of Knowing: Political Implications of the New Biology, Hudson, N. Y., Lindisfarne Press. ————— (2000), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Brown, L. y A. Coles (1999), “Needing to use algebra – A case study”, en O. Zaslavsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Haifa, vol. 2, pp. 153-160. ————— (2011), “Developing expertise: How enactivism re-frames mathematics teacher development”, ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 43, pp. 861-873. Brown, L. y D. Reid (2006), “Embodied Cognition: Somatic markers, purposes and emotional orientations”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 63, núm. 2, pp. 179-192. Coles, A. (2013), Being Alongside: For the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Rotterdam, Sense Publishers. Davis, B. (1995), “Why teach mathematics? Mathematics education and enactivist theory”, For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 15, núm. 2, pp. 2-9. ————— (1996), Teaching Mathematics: Toward a Sound Alternative, Nueva York, Garland Publishing. ————— (1997), “Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 28, pp. 355-376. Davis, B. y E. Simmt (2003), “Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, pp. 137-167. Dawson, S. (1999), “The Enactive Perspective on Teacher Development: ‘A Path Laid While Walking’”, en B. Jaworski, T. Woods y S. Dawson (eds.), Mathematics Teacher Education: Critical International Perspectives, Londres, Falmer Press. Ernest, P. (2010), “Reflections on theories of learning”, en B. Sriraman y L. English (eds.), Theories of Mathematics Education. Seeking New Frontiers, Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 39-47. Glasersfeld, E. von (1995), Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, Londres, Falmer Press. Hannula, M. S. (2012), “Exploring new dimensions of mathematics related affect: embodied and social theories”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 14, núm. 2, pp. 137-161. Johnson, M. (1989), The Body in the Mind, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. (1983), Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Lozano, M. D. (2004), Characterising Algebraic Learning: an enactivist longitudinal study, tesis doctoral, University of Bristol. ————— (2005), “Mathematics learning: ideas from neuroscience and the enactivist approach to cognition”, For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 25, núm. 3, pp. 24-27. ————— (2008), “Characterising Algebraic Learning through enactivism”, Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Morelia, vol. 3, pp. 329- 336. Maturana, H. (1987), “Everything is Said by an Observer”, en W. I. Thompson (ed.), GAIA, A Way of Knowing: Political Implications of the New Biology, Hudson, N.Y., Lindisfarne Press, pp. 65-82. —————(1988a), “Ontology of Observing: The Biological Foundations of Self Consciousness and the Physical Domain of Existence”, Conference Workbook: Texts in Cybernetics, American Society for Cybernetics Conference, Felton, pp. 18-23, http://www.inteco.cl/biology/ontology [30-07-01]. ————— (1992), “Diálogo con Humberto Maturana, un notable biólogo cibernetista, sobre la realidad y el conocimiento”, http://www.puntoedu.edu.ar/comunidades/comunica-cion/sanpedro/comunicacionestrategica [15-04-01]. ————— (2002), “Autopoiesis, Structural Coupling and Cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition”, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, vol. 9, núm. 3-4, pp. 5-34. Maturana, H. y S. Nisis (1998), “Human Awareness: Understanding the Biological Basis of Knowledge and Love in Education”, http://members.ozemail.com.au/~jcull/articles/ arteduc.htm [31-01-03]. Maturana, H. y F. Varela (1984), El árbol del conocimiento, Santiago de Chile, Editorial Universitaria. Maturana, H. y F. Varela (1992), The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, ed. rev., Boston, Shambhala. Piaget, J. (1954), The Construction of Reality in the Child, Nueva York, Basic Books. Reid, D. (1996), “Enactivism as a Methodology”, en L. Puig y A. Gutiérrez (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Valencia, pp. 203-209. Sacks, O. (1995), An Anthropologist on Mars, Londres, Picador. Simon, M. A. (2013), “The need for theories of conceptual learning and teaching of mathematics”, en K. R. Leatham (ed.), Vital Directions for Mathematics Education Research, Nueva York, Springer, pp. 95-118. Stewart, J. (2010), “Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: from the origin of life to consciousness and writing”, en J. Stewart, O. Gapenne y E. D. Paolo (eds.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press. Varela, F. (1987), “Laying down a path by walking”, en W. I. Thompson (ed.), GAIA, A Way of Knowing: Political Implications of the New Biology, Hudson, N.Y., Lindisfarne Press, pp. 48-64. Varela, F. (1999), Ethical Know-How: Action, Wisdom and Cognition, Stanford, Stanford University Press. Varela, F., E. Thompson y E. Rosch (1991), The Embodied Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press. Zack, V. y D. Reid (2003), “Good-enough understanding: Theorising about the learning of complex ideas (Part 1)”, For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 23, pp. 43-50. Zack, V. y D. Reid (2004), “Good-enough understanding: Theorising about the learning of complex ideas (Part 2)”, For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 24, pp. 25-28.