Sujeto, objeto, cultura y la formación del conocimiento
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Radford, Luis
Resumen
La relación sujeto-objeto ha sido reconocida tradicionalmente como un elemento clave en las diferentes teorías del conocimiento. Mientras que, a partir de Kant, la relación se plantea en términos de un sujeto que construye el objeto, con Hegel y luego el materialismo dialéctico, la relación mencionada es vista de tal forma que el objeto de conocimiento es inseparable de la actividad de los individuos Ambas aproximaciones sirvieron de punto de apoyo a elaboraciones teóricas posteriores en ramas como la sicología, la epistemología, la filosofía y la sociología, interesadas en la comprensión del desarrollo del conocimiento. La intención de este artículo es contribuir a la identificación de ciertas diferencias teóricas en corrientes contemporáneas en la Educación Matemática -diferencias que han conducido a lo que Sfard (1999) ha sugestivamente llamado 'la guerra de los paradigmas'. Para ello, en la primera parte, discutimos la forma en que la relación sujeto/objeto fue considerada en el seno de dos de las escuelas que han tenido una influencia mayor en el curso que ha tomado la reflexión en el campo de la Educación Matemática, a saber, la escuela piagetiana de epistemología genética y la escuela histórico-cultural vygotskiana. Luego, a la luz de dicha discusión y centrándonos en el campo propiamente dicho de la Educación Matemática, sugerimos que la conceptualización contemporánea del problema general epistemológico sujeto/objeto aparece como elemento constitutivo de diferencias irreducibles en aproximaciones particulares socio-constructivistas e interaccionistas, por un lado, y socio-culturales, por el otro . Al final se mencionan ciertos problemas con los que ambas aproximaciones se enfrentan en un futuro próximo.
Fecha
2000
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Referencias
Baldwin, J. M. (1911). The Individual and Society, or Psychology and Sociology. Boston: The Gorham Press. Bauersfeld, H. (1998). About the notion of culture in mathematics education, in: F. Seeger, J. Voigt and U. Waschescio (eds.) The culture of mathematics c/assroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 375- 389. Baxandall, M. (1971). Giotto and the Orators. Oxford : Clarendon Press. Bibler, V. S. ( 1983-84). Thinking as creation : Introduction to the logic if mental dialogue, Soviet Psycho/ogy 22 (2), 29-54. Bloch, M. (1985). Marxism and Anthropology. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Blumer, H. ( 1969). Symbolic lnteractionism, Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Bringuier, J-C. (1980). Conversations with Jean Piaget. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Cellerier, G. (1973). Piaget. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Clifford, J. and. Marcus, G. (eds.) (1986). Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cobb, P. (1995). Mathematical learning and small group interaction: Four case studies. In P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld ( eds. ), Emergence of mathematical meaning: lnteracion in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cobb, P. (1998). Learning from Distributed Theories of Intelligence, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3) 187-204. Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M. & Underwood, D. ( 1994). Construction individuelle, acculturation mathématique et communauté scolaire, Revue des sciences de /'éducation, 20 (1), 41-61. Cobb, P., Boifi, A., McClain, K. and Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective Discourse and Collective Reflection, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28 (3), 258-277. Cobb, P. and Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and Situated Learning Perspectives in Theory and Practice, Educational Researcher, 28 (2),4-15. Collin, D. (1996). La théorie de la connaissance chez Marx. Paris / Montréal: L'Harmattan Davydov, V. V. (1967). The problem of Generalization in the works ofL. S. Vygotsky, Soviet Psychology, 5 (3), 42-52. DeVries, R. (1997). Piaget's Social Theory, Educational Researcher, 26 (2), 4-17. Eagleton, T. (1976). Marxism and Literary Criticism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Eagleton, T. (1997). Marx. London: Phoenix. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critica/ Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Longman Fernández-Armestro, F. (1998). Thruth. London: Black Swan. Foucault, M. (1971). L'ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard. Foucault, M. (1980). Power / Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books. Geertz, C. ( 1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Grinevald, J. (1983). Lévi-Strauss' reaction: An interview with Claud Lévi-Strauss by Jacques Grinevald, New Ideas in Psychology, 1 (1), 81-86. Hewitt, J. (1997). Self and Society. A symbolic lnteractionist Social Psychology. Boston, London, Toronto, etc.: Allyn and Bacon. Hintikka, J. (1980). La philosophie des mathématiques chez Kant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Janet, P. (1929/1984). L 'évolution psychologique de la personnalité. Paris : Masson. John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (I 996). Sociocultural Approaches to Leaming DeveJopment: A Vygotskian Framework, Educational Psychologist, 31 (3/4), 191-206. Kant, l. (1996). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar from the 1781 and 1787 editions, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. Lawrence, J. A., Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual Roots oflntemalization: From Transmission to Transformation, Human Development, 36, 150-167. Lave, J. and Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lee, B. (1985). Intellectual origins ofVygotsky's semiotic analysis, in: J. V. Wertsch (ed.) Culture, Communication and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-93. Lektorsky, V. A. ( 1978). Activity with objects and the Marxist theory of knowledge, Soviet Psychology, 16 (4), 47-55. Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, Object, Cognition, Moscow: Progress Publisher. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The Problem of Activity in Psychology, in: The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology, translated and edited by J. V. Wertsch, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 37-71. Leontiev, A. N. (1984). Activité, Conscience, personnalité. Moscou: Éditions du Progres. Leontiev, A. N. (1994) The deveopment of voluntary attention in the child, In: R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (eds.), The Vygotsky Reader. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell, 289-312. Lévi-Strauss, C. ( 1962). La pensée sauvage. París: Pion. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive Development, lts Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, Ma and London, England : Harvard University Press. Luria, A. R. ( 1987). Desarrollo histórico de los procesos cognitivos. Madrid: Akal. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Paris: Les éditions de minuit. Lyotard, J.-F. (1986). Le postmoderne expliqué aux enfants. París: Éditions Galilée. Markus, G. (1982). Langage et production. París : Éditions Denoel /Gonthier. Marx, K. y Engels, F. (1970). The German Jdeology, Edited with Introduction by C. J. Arthur, New York: International Publishers. Mikhailov, F. T. ( 1980). The Riddle of the Self. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Murphy, J. W. (1988). Making sense of postmodem sociology, The British Journal of Sociology, 39 (4), 600-614. Nader, L (1996). Naked Science. Anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power and knowledge. New York: Routledge. Nicolas, A. (1976). Jean Piaget. Paris: Éditions Seghers. Otte, M. (1998). Limits of constructivism: Kant, Piaget and Peirce, Science & Education, 1, 425-450. Piaget, J. (1967). Études sociologiques. Geneve : Librairie Droz. Piaget, J. (1969). Biología y conocimiento: ensayo sobre las relaciones entre las regulaciones orgánicas y los procesos cognoscitivos, México, España, Argentina, Colombia: Siglo veintiuno RadforéÍ, L. (1998). On Signs and Representations. A Cultural Account, Scientia PaedagogicaExperimentalis, Vol. 35 (1), 277-302. Radford, L. ( 1999). Rethinking representations, Proceedings of the 21st annual Conference of the lnternational Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North-American Chapter, PME-NA, Mexico, Vol. 1, 147-150. Sfard, A ( 1999). Doing research in mathematics education in time of paradigm wars, Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the lnternational Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, O. Zaslavsky (ed.), Vol. 1, 75-92. Tyler, S. (1986). Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document, In: Writing Culture, J. Clifford and G. Marcus (eds.) Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 122-140. Tyler, S. (1987). The Unspeakable, Discourse, Dialogue, and Rhetoric in the Postmodern World, Madison : The University of Wisconsin Press. van der Veer, R. ( 1996). The concept of culture in Vygotsky's Thinking, Culture and Psychology, 2, 247-263. van der Veer, R. (1998). From Concept Attainment to Knowledge Formation, Mind, Culture, and Activity 5 (2), 89-94. van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J. (1988). Lev Vygotsky and Pierre Janet: On the Origin of the Concept of Sociogenesis, Developmental Review 8, 52-65. van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky, Oxford Uk and Cambridge USA: Blackwell. Voigt, J. (1985). Pattems and routines in classroom interaction, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 6 ( 1 ), 69-118. Voigt, J. (1989). The Social Constitution of the Mathematics Province-A Microeth- . no-graphical Study in Classroom Interaction, The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 11 (1&2),27-34. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms, in: P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld ( eds.) The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning, lnteraction in Classroom Cultures, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates, 163-201. Voigt, J. (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom: Negotiating the mathematical meaning of empírica} phenomena, in: The Culture oftheMathematics Classroom, F. Seeger, J. Voigt and U. Waschescio ( eds. ), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191- 220. von Glasersfeld, E. ( 1995a). A constructivists approach to teaching, in: Constructivism in Education, Leslie. P. Steffe and Jerry Gale ( eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3-15. vnn Glasersfeld von, E. (1995b ). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, London/Wasington, D.C.: The Falmer Press . . Vygotsky, L. S. y Luria, A. (1994). Too! and symbol in child development. En René van der Veer y Jaan Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader,. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 99-174. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The development of higher mental functions, in: J. V. Wertsch (Ed.) The concept of activity in Sovietic psychology, Arrnonk, N. Y.: Sharpe, pp. 144-188. Vygotski, L. S. ( 1988). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores, Barcelona: Grijalbo. Vygotsky, L. S. ( 1994). The problem of the environment, in: R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, eds. The Vygotsky Reader. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Collected Works, Edited by R. Rieber, New York and London : Plenum Press, Vol. 4. Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the Subject in Situated Cognition Theory, In: D. Kirshner and J. A. Whitson (eds.), Situated Cognition. Mahwah, New Jersay: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57-70. Wardekker, W. (1998). Scientific concepts and reflection, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5 (2), 143-153. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models, Representation and the Scientific Understanding. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Waschescio, U. (1998). The missing link: Social and cultural aspects in social constructivist theories, in : F. Seeger, J. Voigt and U. Waschescio ( eds. ), The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221-241. Wertsch, J. et Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of higher mental functions, in: J. V. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 162-179. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge Massachusetts and London England: Harvard University Press. Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Cornmentary, Human Development, 36: 168-171. Wolff, R. P. (1963). Kant's Theory of Mental Activity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.