Complejidad en el acto de conocer: segunda sesión

Referencias

Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., William, D., y Johnson, D. (1997). The contribution of professional development to effectiveness in the teaching of numeracy. Teacher Development, 1(3), 335-355. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M. y Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm Intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford University Press, Nueva York. Boaler, J. (2002). The development of disciplinary relationships: Knowledge, practice and identity in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22 (1), 42-47. Carrasco, E., Hernandez, J., Carrión, V., Arrieta, J., Díaz-Moreno, L.(2016) Complejidad y Construcción de Conocimiento. En E. Mariscal Flores (Ed.), Acta Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa 29, 808-816, México, DF: Colegio Mexicano de Matemática Educativa A. C. y Comité Latinoamericano de Matemática Educativa. Castiglione, F. (2006). Agent based modeling. Scholarpedia, 1. Davis, B. (2008). Complexity and education: Vital simultaneities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 50-65, DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00402.x Davis, B., y Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for research in mathematics education, 137-167. Dickes, A., Sengupta, P., Farris, A.V., y Basu, S. (2016). Development of Mechanistic Reasoning and Multi-level Explanations in 3rdGrade Biology Using Multi-Agent Based Models. Science Education. 100 (4), 734-776. Hernández, J.E., Carrión, V. y Carreón, G. (2016, May). Decentralized Simulation Phenomena to Foster Mathematical Thinking Development in the Classroom. In M. Takeuchi, A.P. Preciado Babb, y J. Lock. IDEAS 2016: Designing for Innovation Selected Proceedings. Paper presented at IDEAS 2016: Designing for Innovation, Calgary, Canada (pg 171-181). Calgary, Canada: Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary. Holland, J.H. (1996) Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Perseus Books Koopmans, M. y Stamovlasis, D. (2016). Introduction to Education as a Complex Dynamical System. In M. Koopmans y D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex Dynamical Systems in Education (pp. 1-7). Springer International Publishing. Liljedahl, P. (2016). Building Thinking Classrooms: Conditions for Problem-Solving. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen y J. Kilpatrick (Eds), Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems (pp. 361-386). Springer International Publishing. Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267. Maturana, H. R., y Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library/Shambhala Publications. Morin, E. (1999). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. Paidós Barcelona. Penrose R. (1989). The emperor's new mind: concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Preciado-Babb, A. P. (2011). Conversations held and roles played during mathematics teachers' collaborative design: Two dimensions of interaction (Doctoral dissertation, Education: Faculty of Education). Recuperado desde http://summit.sfu.ca/item/12072, el 11 de Julio de 2016. Preciado-Babb, A. P., Metz, M. y Marcotte, C. (2015). Awareness as an enactivist framework for the mathematical learning of teachers, mentors and institutions. ZDM, 47(2), 257-268. Thompson, E. y Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28, 23–30. Towers, J. y Martin, L. C. (2015). Enactivism and the study of collectivity. ZDM, 47(2), 247-256. World Association of Lesson Studies (2016). World Association of Lesson Studies. http://www.walsnet.org/ Varela, F. (2000). El fenómeno de la vida. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen. Wilensky, U., y Stroup, W. (1999). Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Wilensky, U., y Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 171 – 209.