Ser, subjetividad y alienación

Referencias

Arendt, H. (1958). The modern concept of history. The Review of Politics, 20(4), 570-590. Baldino, R., & Cabral, T. (1998). Lacan and the school’s credit system. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 22, pp. 56-63). Stellenbosch, South Africa. University of Stellenbosch: PME. Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability. Austin: University of Texas Press. Beaud, M. (2004). A history of capitalism. Delhi: Aakar Books. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Brousseau, G. (2003). Glossaire de quelques concepts de la théorie des situations didactiques en mathématiques [Glossary of some concepts of the theory of didactic situations in mathematics]. Retrieved on January 20, 2007, From http://dipmat.math.unipa.it/~grim/Gloss_fr_Brousseau.pdf. Cambiano, G. (1993). Devenir homme. In J. Vernant (Ed.), L’homme grec (pp. 171-215). Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Cassirer, E. (1963). The individual and the cosmos in renaissance philosophy. (Original work published in 1927). New York: Harper Torchbooks. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175-190. Fischbach, F. (2012). Sans objet. Capitalisme, subjectivité, alienation [Sin objeto. Capitalismo, subjetividad, alienación]. Paris: Vrin. Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of indignation. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2008). Contrasts and oblique connections between historical conceptual developments and classroom learning in mathematics. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd edition) (pp. 626-655). New York: Taylor and Francis. Glasersfeld von, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press. Hegel, G. (2001). The philosophy of history. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books. (Original work published 1837) Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (Translated by J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson). New York: Harper. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of the European science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. London: The University of California Press. Lancy, D. F. (1983). Crosscultural studies in cognition and mathematics. New York: Academic Press. Le Goff, J. (1956). Marchands et banquiers du moyen age. (7th updated edition, 1986). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Leont’ev, A. N. (1974). The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4-33. Leont’ev [or Leontyev], A. N. (2009). Activity and consciousness. Pacifica, CA: MIA. Retrieved August 29, 2009, from http://www.marxists.org/archive/leon-tev/works/activity-consciousness.pdf. Lévinas, E. (1982). Éthique et infini. Paris: Fayard. Lizcano, E. (2009). Imaginario colectivo y creación matemática. Madrid: Gedisa. Marx, K. (1988). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1932). Marx, K. (2007). Manuscrits économico-philosophiques de 1844 [Manuscritos económico-filosóficos de 1844]. (F. Fischbach, Trans.). Paris: Vrin. (Original work published 1932) Owens, K. (2001). Indigenous mathematics: a rich diversity. Mathematics: Shaping Australia. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, 151–167. Retrieved Feburary 17, 2006, from: http://www.aamt.edu.au/ICSIMAN/resources/papers/owens.pdf. Pais, A. (2011). Mathematics education and the political: An ideology critique of an educational research field. Ph. D. Dissertation. Aalborg, Denmark: Department of Learning and Philosophy. Aalborg University. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. The future of education. New York: Grossman. Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3-34. Pumuge, H. M. (1975). The counting system of the pekaialue tribe of the topopul village in the ialibu subdistrict in the southern highlands district, papua new guinea. Science in New Guinea, 3(1), 19-25. Radford, L. (2006). Elementos de una teoría cultural de la objetivación [Elements of a cultural theory of objectification]. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, Special Issue on Semiotics, Culture and Mathematical Thinking, 103-129 (available at: http://www.laurentian.ca/educ/lradford/). Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 215-234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 101-118. Radford, L. (2013). Sumisión, alienación y (un poco de) esperanza: hacia una visión cultural, histórica, ética y política de la enseñanza de las matemáticas. In A. Ramirez y Y. Morales (Eds). Memorias del I Congreso de Educación Matemá-tica de América Central y El Caribe. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana, November 6-8, 2013 (disponible en la página: http://luisradford.ca) Radford, L. (2014). De la teoría de la objetivación [on the theory of objectification]. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 7(2), 132-150. Radford, L. (2015). Of love, frustration, and mathematics: A cultural-historical approach to emotions in mathematics teaching and learning. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education(pp. 25-49). New York: Springer. Radford, L. (2016). On alienation in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 258-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.04.001. Radford, L., & Roth, W. -M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2-3), 227-245. Shweder, R., & LeVine, R. (1984). Culture theory. Essays on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spinoza, B. (1989). Ethics including the improvement of the understanding. (R. Elwes, Trans.). Buffalo: Prometheus. (Original work published 1667) Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press. Thompson, P. (2014). Constructivism in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 96-100). New York: Springer. Todorov, T. (2000). Éloge de l›individu [Elogio del individuo]. Paris: Adam Biro. Valero, M. (2004). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In P. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35-54). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Valero, P. (2009). Mathematics education as a network of social practices. In Proceedings of the 6th conference of European research in mathematics education (CERME 6). Lyon, France, Jan. 28th - Feb. 1, 2009. (Retrieved on December 10 2010 from) http://www.inrp.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/plenary2-valero.pdf). Vygotski, L. (1985). Pensée et langage. Paris: Messidor. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Collected Works (Vol. 1). R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Collected works (vol. 6). R. W. Rieber (Ed.). New York: Plenum.