Executable functions of the representations in learning the algebraic concepts

Referencias

Adu-Gyamfi, K., (2002). External Multiple Representations in Mathematics Teaching, Unpublished Thesis, Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Blanton, M. & Kaput, J. (2003). Developing elementary teachers' “algebra eyes and ears”. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(2), 70-77. Brunner, M. E., Mayer, R. E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Reed, B. S. & Webb, D. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 663-689. Cramer, K., &Bezuk, N. (1991). Multiplication of fractions: teaching for understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 34-37. Davies, D. (1988). An algebra class unveils models of linear equations in three variables. In A. F. Coxford (Ed.), The Ideas of Algebra, K-12 (pp. 199-204). Reston, VA: NCTM. DiSessa, A. A., Hammer, D. &Sherin, B. (1991). Inventing graphing: metarepresentational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117-160. Duval, R., (2006). A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103-131. Gouya, Z, Sereshti, H. (2006). Teaching calculus: existing problems and the role of technology. Journal of developments in Mathematics Education, No. 83. pp: 2 and 30 - 31. Office of Educational aids Publications, Organization of educational research and planning, Ministry of Education. Herscovics, N. (1989). Cognitive obstacles encountered in the learning of algebra. In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp.60-87). Virginia: NCTM Publications. Janvier, C. (1987a). Conceptions and representations: The circle as an example In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of Representations in the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics (pp. 147-159). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Janvier, C. (1987b). Representations and understanding: The notion of function as an example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of Representations in the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics (pp. 67-73). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kaput, J. J. (1986). Information technology and mathematics: Opening new representational windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 187-207. Kaput, J. J. (1994). The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Strasser, & B. Winkelman (Eds.), Didactics in Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline (pp. 379-397). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Kieran, C. (1989) The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective, In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra (pp. 33-57). Virginia: NCTM Publications. Kieran, C. &Chalouh, L. (1992). Prealgebra: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research Ideas for the Classroom: Middle Grades Mathematics (pp. 59-71). New York: Macmillan. Kilpatrick, J, Swafford, J. (2001). Helping children learn mathematics. [Trans] Mehdi Behzad and Zahra Gouya (2008), First edition, Fatemi publications, Tehran. pp. 32 - 38. Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2000). Teachers` and researchers` beliefs about the development of algebraic reasoning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168-190. Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: considerations for identification, diagnosis and remediaton. In R. Lesh, D. Mierkiewicz, & M. G. Kantowski (Eds.), Applied Mathematical Problem Solving. Ohio: ERIC/SMEAC. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987b). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (pp. 33-40). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lubinski, C. A. & Otto, A. D. (2002). Meaningful mathematical representations and early algebraic reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(2), 76-91. Murata, A., & Stewart, Ch. (2017). Facilitating Mathematical Practices through Visual Representations, Teaching Children Mathematics, pp. 404-412. McGregor, M., & Price, E. (1999). An exploration of aspects of language proficiency and algebra learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 449-467. Moseley B. & Brunner M. E. (1997). Using multiple representations for conceptual change in pre-algebra: A comparison of variable usage with graphic and text based problems (pp.29-30). Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM-2000) .pp :67-70, 360-363. Ozgun-Koca S. (2001). Computer-based representations in mathematics classrooms: The effects of multiple linked and semi-linked representations on students’ learning of linear relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, USA. Pape, S. J., &Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation (s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118-127. Pirie, S. E. B. & Martin, L. (1997). The equation, the whole equation and nothing but the equation! One approach to the teaching of linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 159-181. Post, T., Behr, M. J., &Lesh, R. (1988). Proportionality and the development of prealgebra understanding. In A. F. Coxford (Ed.), The Ideas of Algebra (pp.78-91). Reston, VA: NCTM. Rau, M. A., & Matthews, P. G. (2017). How to make ‘more’ better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance student learning. ZDM - Mathematics Education. 49(4), 491-496. Sauriol, J. (2013). Introducing Algebra through the Graphical Representation of Functions: A Study among LD Students, ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Tufts University Smith, E. (2004). Statis and change: Integrating patterns, functions and algebra throughout the K-12 curriculum. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 136-151). Reston, VA: NCTM. Tall, D.O., (1991), (Ed), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, theNetherlands. Tishman, S., & Perkins, D. (1997). The language of thinking. Phi Delta Kappan,78(5), 368-374. van de Walle, J. A. (2001). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. New York: Longman, Inc. van Dyke, F., &Craine, T. (1997). Equivalent representations in the learning of algebra. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 616-619. Wagner, S. (1983). What are these things called variables?, Mathematics Teacher, (474-479). Wagner, S., & Kieran, C. (1999). An agenda for research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In B. Moses (Ed.), Algebraic Thinking, Grades K-12 (pp. 362-372). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Yerushalmy, M. & Gilead, S. (1997). Solving equations in a technological environment. The Mathematics Teacher, 90(2), 156-162.