Construcciones SERLIST y SERFUNC de series infinitas

Referencias

Asiala, M., A. Brown, D. J. DeVries, E. Dubinsky, D. Mathews y K. Thomas (1996), “A framework for research and development in undergraduate mathematics education”, en J. Kaput, E. Dubinsky y A. H. Schoenfeld (eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II, Providence, American Mathematical Society, pp. 1-32. Bagni, G. T. (2000), “Difficulties with series in history and in the classroom”, en J. Fauvel y J. van Maanen (eds.), History in mathematics education: the ICMI study, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 82-86. Bagni, G. T. (2005), “Infinite series from history to mathematics education”, International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning [revista en línea], University of Plymouth, Reino Unido, leído el 30 de junio de 2005 en http://cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/default.htm. Baker, B., L. Cooley y M. Trigueros (2000), “The schema triad —a calculus example”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 31, pp. 557-578. Brown, A., D. DeVries, E. Dubinsky y K. Thomas (1998), “Learning binary operations, groups, and subgroups”, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, vol. 16, núm. 3, pp. 187-239. Cooley, L., M. Trigueros y B. Baker (2007), “Schema thematization: a framework and an example”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 38, pp. 370-392. Czarnocha, B., E. Dubinsky, V. Prabhu y D. Vidakovic (1999), “One theoretical perspective in undergraduate mathematics education research”, en O. Zaslavsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of PME , vol. 1, Haifa, PME, pp. 95-110. Czarnocha, B., E. Dubinsky, S. Loch, V. Prabhu y D. Vidakovic (2001), “Conceptions of area: in students and in history”, The College Mathematics Journal, vol. 32, núm. 2, pp. 99-109. Dubinsky, E. (1991), “Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking”, en D. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 95-123. ————————– (1994), “A theory and practice of learning college mathematics”, en A. Schoenfeld (ed.), Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving, Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp. 221-243. ————————– (1996), “Una aplicación de la perspectiva piagetiana a la educación matemática postsecundaria”, Educación Matemática, vol. 3, núm 8, pp. 24-45. Dubinsky, E., K. Weller, M. A. McDonald y A. Brown (2005), “Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: an APOS analysis, Part 1”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 58, núm. 3, pp. 335-359. Dubinsky, E. y O. Yiparaki (2000), “On student understanding of AE and EA quantification”, en E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld y J. Kaput (eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education IV, Providence, American Mathematical Society, pp. 239-289. Fishbein, E., D. Tirosh y U. Melamed (1981), “Is it possible to measure the intuitive acceptance of a mathematical statement?”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 12, pp. 491-512. Gray, E. M. y D. O. Tall (1987), “Duality, flexibility, and ambiguity: a proceptual view of elementary arithmetic”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 25, núm. 2, pp. 116-140. Kline, M. (1972), Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, vol. 2, Nueva York, Oxford University Press. Mamona, J. C. (1990), “Sequences and series-sequences and functions: students’ confusions”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 21, pp. 333-337. Martínez-Planell, R. y M. Trigueros (2009), “Students’ ideas on functions of two variables: domain, range, and representations”, en S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson y S. Lemons-Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 5, Atlanta, Georgia State University, pp. 73-80. McDonald, M. A., D. Mathews y K. Strobel (2000), “Understanding sequences: a tale of two objects”, en E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld y J. Kaput (eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV, Providence, American Mathematical Society, pp. 77-102. Piaget, J. y R. García (1983), Psicogénesis e historia de la ciencia, México, Siglo XXI Editores. Przenioslo, M. (2006), “Conceptions of a sequence formed in secondary school”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 37, núm. 7, pp. 805-823. Sierpin ́ska, A. (1987), “Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 18, núm. 4, pp. 371-397. Smith, D. E. (1958), History of Mathematics, vol. 2, Nueva York, Dover Publications. Stewart, J. (2001), Calculus: Concepts and Contexts, 2a. ed., Pacific Grove, Brooks/Cole. Tall, D. O. (1992), “The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: functions, limits, infinity, and proof”, en D. A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Nueva York, McMillan, pp. 495-511. Trigueros, M. (2000), “Students’ conception of solution curves and equilibrium in systems of differential equations”, en M. L. Fernandez (ed.), Proceedings of the XXII Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, ERIC, pp. 93-97. ————————– (2005), “La noción de esquema en la investigación en matemática educativa a nivel superior”, Educación Matemática, vol. 17, núm. 1, pp. 5-31. Trigueros, M. y R. Martínez-Planell (2010), “Geometrical representations in the learning of two variable functions”, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 73, núm. 1, pp. 3-19.