Argumentos formales y visuales en clase de geometría a nivel primaria

Referencias

Clements, S., O’Daffer, P. & Cooney, T. (1998). Geometría. México. Pearson. Conner, A., Singletary, L., Smith, A., Wagner, P. & Francisco, P. (2014). Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16:3, 181-200, DOI: 10.1080/10986065.2014.921131. Goizueta, M. & Planas, N. (2013). Temas emergentes del análisis de interpretaciones del profesorado sobre la argumentación en clase de matemáticas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. 31(1), 61-78. Groarke, L. (2009). Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument. In: F. H. van Eemeren & Garssen, B. (eds.). Pondering on Problems of Argumentation. Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2005). La fuerza de la aserción y el poder persuasivo en la argumentación en matemáticas. Revista EMA: Investigación e Innovación en Educación Matemática, 10, 327-352. Inglis, M., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2009). On the Persuasiveness of Visual Arguments in Mathematics. Foundations of Science, 14(1-2), 97–110. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9149-4. Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling Mathematical Argumentation: The Importance of Qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The Ethnology of Argumentation. In: P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld (eds.). The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 229–269. Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the Primary Mathematics Classroom. Two Episodes and Related Theoretical Abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60–82. Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for Reconstructing Processes of Argumentation and Participation in Primary Mathematics Classroom Interaction. En Bikner-Knipping et al. (eds.). Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 51-72). New York: Advances in Mathematics Education. Krummheuer, G. (2013). The Relationship between Diagrammatic Argumentation and Narrative Argumentation in the Context of the Development of Mathematical Thinking in the Early Years. Educational Studies Mathematics, 84:249–265, DOI: 10.1007/ s10649-013-9471-9. Molina, M., Castro, E., Molina, J., & Castro, E. (2012). Un acercamiento a la investigación de diseño a través de los experimentos de enseñanza. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 29(1), 075–088. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Potari, D., Zachariades, T. & Zaslavsky, O. (2010). Mathematics Teachers’ Reasoning for Refuting Students’ Invalid Claims. In: V. Durand-Guerrier, France S. Soury-Lavergne, F. Arzarello (eds.). Proceedings of Sixth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education, pp. 281-290, Lyon France: CERME 6. Reid, D., Knipping, C. & Crosby, M. (2011). Refutations and the Logic of Practice. PNA, 6(1), 1-10. Rumsey, C. & Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting Mathematical Argumentation. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(7), 413-419. Solar, H., Azcárate, C. & Deulofeu, J. (2011). Competencia de argumentación en, la interpretación de gráficas funcionales. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(3): 133-154. Steffe, L. P. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching Experiment Methodology: Underlying Principles and Essential Elements. In: R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (eds.). Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education, pp. 267-307. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D. & Janik, A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning (2nd ed.). New York, London: MacMillan. Viholainen, A. (2008). Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Informal and Formal Reasoning about the Concepts of Derivative and Differentiability. Dissertation. En: http://www.math.jyu.fi/research/reports/rep115.pdf. Whitenack, J. W. & Knipping, N. (2002). Argumentation, Instructional Design Ttheory and Students’ Mathematical Learning: A Case for Coordinating Interpretive Lenses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 441–457. http://doi.org/10.1016/ S0732-3123(02)00144-X. Yackel, E. (2002). What We Can Learn from Analyzing the Teacher’s Role in Collective Argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423–440. http://doi. org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8. Zacharos, K., Pournantzi, V., Moutsios-Rentzos, A. & Shiakalli, M. A. (2016). Forms of Argument Used by Pre-school Children. Educational Journal of the University of Patras. UNESCO Chair, 3(2), 167-178.