¿Ayudan los materiales manipulativos a resolver tareas matemáticas? Sí, pero…

Referencias

Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of Math Education. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 16(2), 14-18, 46-47. Baroody, A. J. (1989). Manipulatives don't come with guarantees. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(2), 4-5. Baroody, A. J. (2017). The use of concrete experiences in Early Childhood Mathematics instruction. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 53, 43-94. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52(3), 345-370. Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C. y Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380-400. De Castro, C. (2015). Aprendiendo a subitizar cantidades con el rekenrek en un sistema online para el aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Épsilon, 90, 49-57. Heinze, G., Wallisch, C. y Dunkler, D. (2018). Variable selection: A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biometrical Journal, 60(3), 431-449. Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Marks, R. y Brown, M. (2018). Evidence for review of mathematics teaching: Improving mathematics in key stages two and three. Londres, Reino Unido: Education Endowment Foundation. Hosmer, D. W. y Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). Nueva York, EE. UU.: John Wiley & Sons. Hughes, M. (1986). Los niños y los números. Las dificultades en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas. Barcelona: Planeta. López, M. y Alsina, Á. (2015). La influencia del método de enseñanza en la adquisición de conocimientos matemáticos en Educación Infantil. Edma 0-6, 4(1), 1-10. Marshall, L. y Swan, P. (2008). Exploring the use of mathematics manipulative materials: Is it what we think it is? En Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 International Conference. Sustainability in Higher Education: Directions for Change. Perth, Australia: Edith Cowan University. Recuperado de: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ceducom/33/ Maz-Machado, A. y Adrián, C. (2014). Uso de materiales didácticos y desarrollo del sentido numérico en primaria. En J. L. González, J. A. Fernández-Plaza, E. Castro-Rodríguez, M. T. Sánchez-Compaña, C. Fernández, J. L. Lupiáñez y L. Puig (Eds.), Investigaciones en Pensamiento Numérico y Algebraico e Historia de las Matemáticas y Educación Matemática - 2014 (pp. 109-114). Málaga: Departamento de Didáctica de las Matemáticas, de las Ciencias Sociales y de las Ciencias Experimentales y SEIEM. McNeil, N. y Jarvin, L. (2007). When theories don't add up: Disentangling the manipulatives debate. Theory Into Practice, 46(4), 309-316. Mood, C. (2010). Logistic Regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67-82. Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 175-197. Moyer-Packenham, P. S. y Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35-50. R Core Team (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Viena, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Recuperado de: http://www.R-project.org/ Sarama, J. y Clements, D. H. (2009). Early Childhood Mathematics Education Research: Learning Trajectories for Young Children. Nueva York, EE. UU.: Routledge. Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(5), 498-505. Vicente, S. y Orrantia, J. (2007). Resolución de problemas y comprensión situacional. Cultura y Educación, 19(1), 61-85. Zbrodoff, N. J. y Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. En J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 331-345). New York, EE. UU.: Psychology Press.