Conocimiento pedagógico del contenido en la formación de docentes de matemática

Referencias

Adajian, L. B. (1995). Teachers’ professional community and the teaching of mathematics. Tesis doctoral. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Artzt, A. F. (1999). A structure to enable preservice teachers of mathematics to reflect on their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 143-166. Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? En M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63-83). New York: Teacher College Press. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. En J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. En V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Bloom, J. (1998). Creating a classroom community of young scientists: A desktop companion. Toronto, ON: Irwin. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teachers’ knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. En T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35-65). New York: Teachers College Press. Broome, R. (1994). Beyond subject matter: A psychological topology of teachers’ professional knowledge. En R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. StraBer & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 73-88). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Calsen, W. (2001). Domains of teachers knowledge. En J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 133-144). Carpenter, T., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers [Special issue]. International Journal of Educational Research, 457-470. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3-20. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385-401. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531. Clark, C. M. & Elmore, J. L. (1981). Transforming curriculum in mathematics, science and writing: A case study of teacher yearly planning (Research Series 99). East Lansing, MI: Michigan Sate University, Institute for Research on Teaching. Cooney, T. J. (1999). Conceptualizing teachers’ ways of knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 163-187. Dewey, J. (1983). The child and the curriculum. En J.A. Boydston (Ed.), Jonh Dewey: The middle works, 1899-1924 (pp. 273-291). Fogarty, J., Wang, M., & Creek, R. (1983). A descriptive study of experienced and novice teachers’ interactive instructional thoughts abd actions. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 22-32. Gess-Newsome, J. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. En J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. The Construct and its implications for Science Education (pp. 3-17). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Gómez, P. (2007). Desarrollo del contenido didáctico en un plan de formación inicial de profesores de matemática de secundaria. Tesis de doctorado, Departamento de Didáctica de la Matemática, Universidad de Granada, Granada. Gonzalez, J. L., & Wagenaar, R. (2003). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Informe final. fase uno. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto y Universidad de Groningen. Graeber, A. O. (1999). Forms of knowing mathematics: What preservice teachers should learn. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1-3), 189-208. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press. Grossman, P. L. & Rickert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledge knowledge growth: A reexamination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 53-62. Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. En M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge Base for the beginning Teacher (pp. 23-36). Oxford: Pergamon Press. Grouws, D. A., & Schultz, K. A. (1996). Mathematics teacher education. En J. Sikula, T., J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed, pp. 442-458). New York: Macmillan. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A Constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press. Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. En D. Bound, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page. Lewis, C. (2002). What are the Essential Elements of Lesson Study? The California Science Project Connection. Volume 2, No. 6. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McEwan, H. (1987). Interpreting the subject domains for students: Towards a rhetorical thoery of teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Seatle. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (en prensa). Designing learning from day one: A first day activity to foster design thinking about educational technology. Teacher’s College Record. Nickerson, S. D., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teachers’ professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 113-140. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T., & Fennema, E. (1989). Teachers’ knowledge of students’ knowledge in mathematics problem solving: Correlational and case analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 558-569. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1-40. Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-429. Programa Estado de la Nación en Desarrollo Humano Sostenible. (2008). Segundo Estado de la Educación. San José, Costa Rica: Consejo Nacional de Rectores. Rico, L. (2004). Reflexiones sobre la formación inicial del profesor de matemáticas de secundaria. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y Formación de Profesorado, 8(001). Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing a reflective approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 22-30. Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers’ seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher education, 1, 55-87. Schön, D. S. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith. Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast:” The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Secada, W.G., & Adajian, L. (1997). Mathematics teachers’ change in the context of their profesional communities. En E. Fennema and B.S. Nelson (Eds.), Teachers in transition: Mathematics and reform (pp.193-219). Mahwash, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: The pedagogy of content/the content of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 489-504. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Shulman, L. S. (2004). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. En L. S. Shulman (Ed.), The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Steffe, L., & Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principlesVand essential elements. En A. E. Kelley & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Abstraction, re-presentation, and reflection: An interpretation of experience and Piaget’s approach. In L. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 45-67). New York: Springer-Verlag. Zhao, Y. (Ed.)(2003). What teachers should now about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, Ct: Information Age Publishing.