La influencia conjunta del uso de GeoGebra y lápiz y papel en la adquisición de competencias del alumnado

Referencias

ARTIGUE, M. (2002). Learning Mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work, Internacional Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, pp. 245-274. ARZARELLO, F. y otros (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practices in Cabri environments, Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 34(3), pp. 66-72. COBO, P. (1998). Análisis de los procesos cognitivos y de las interacciones sociales entre alumnos (16-17) en la resolución de problemas que comparan áreas de superficies planas. Un estudio de casos. Tesis doctoral. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. DRIJVERS, P. (2003). Learning algebra in a computer algebra environment: design research on the understanding of the concept of parameter. Doctoral dissertation. Universiteit Utrecht. EISENHART, M. A. (1988). The Ethnographic Research Tradition and Mathematics Education Research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), pp. 99-114. GUTIÉRREZ, A. (2005). Aspectos metodológicos de la investigación sobre aprendizaje de la demostración mediante exploraciones con software de geometría dinámica, en Maz, A., Gómez, B. y Torralbo, M. (eds.). Actas del 9.º Simposio de la Sociedad Española de Investigación en Educación Matemática (SEIEM), pp. 27-44. HOHENWARTER, M. y PREINER, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Aplications. ID1448, vol. 7. HOLLEBRANDS, K. (2007). The Role of a Dynamic Software Program for Geometry in the Strategies High School Mathematics Students Employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), pp. 164-192. HOYLES, C. y NOSS, R. (1994). Dynamic geometry environments: What’s the point? Mathematics teacher, 87, pp. 716-717. LABORDE, C. (1992) Solving problems in computer based Geometry environment: the influence of the feature of the software, Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 92(4), pp. 128-135. LABORDE, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with CabriCabri-Geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, pp. 283-317. LABORDE, C. y CAPPONI, B. (1994). Cabri-Géomètre constituant d’un milieu pour l’apprentissage de la notion de figure géométrique, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 14. 1(2), pp. 165-209. RABERDEL, P. (2001). Instrumented mediated activity in situations, en Blandford A., Vanderdonckt J., Gray P. (eds). People and computers XV-interactions without frontiers, pp. 17-30. Berlín: Springer-Verlag. TROUCHE, L. (2005). Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven & L. Trouche (Eds), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument, pp. 198-230. Nueva York: Springer. VERILLON, P. y RABARDEL, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 10(1), pp.77-101. WHITE, T. (2008). Debugging an Artifact, Instrumenting a Bug: Dialectics of Instrumentation and Design in Technology- Rich Learning Environments. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13, pp.1-26.