Estructura y dinámica de argumentos analógicos, abductivos y deductivos: un curso de geometría del espacio como contexto de reflexión

Referencias

Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: A complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. International Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, 3(4). Recuperado de: . Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F. y Pedemonte, B. (2010). Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation. En M. M. Pinto y T. F. Kawasaky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 1, (pp. 179-204). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME. Recuperado de: . Conner, A., Sigletary, L., Smith, R., Wagner, P. y Francisco, R. (2014). Identifying kinds of reasoning in collective argumentation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(3), 181-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.921131 English, L. (2004). Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners. En L. English (Ed.), Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning in Early Childhood (pp. 1-22). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610706 Font, V., Godino, J. D. y Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9411-0 Godino, J. D., Batanero, C. y Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1-2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0004-1 Graumann, G. (2005). Investigating and ordering Quadrilaterals and their analogies in space-problem fields with various aspects. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(3), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-005-0008-2 Juthe, A. (2005). Argument by analogy. Argumentation, 19(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2314-9 Kelly, A. y Lesh, R. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602725 Knipping, C. y Reid, D. (2015). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A perspective on proving processes in secondary mathematics classroom interactions. En A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping y N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Examples of Methodology and Methods (pp. 75-101). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_4 Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. En P. Cobb y H. Bauersfeld (Eds.) The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for reconstructing processes of argumentation and participation in primary mathematics classroom interaction. En A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping y N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Examples of Methodology and Methods (pp. 51-74). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_3 Lee, K. H., Kim, M. J., Na, G. S., Han, D. H. y Song, S. H. (2007). Induction, analogy, and imagery in geometric reasoning. En J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park y D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 145-152). Seul: PME. Retrieved from https://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME31/3/145.pdf Lee, K. y Sriraman, B. (2011). Conjecturing via reconceived classical analogy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9274-1 Mackey, A. y Gass, S. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612564 Mammana, M. F., Micale, B. y Pennisi, M. (2012). Analogy and dynamic geometry system used to introduce three-dimensional geometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 818-830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.662286 Mariotti, M., Bartolini Bussi, M., Boero, P., Ferri, F. y Garuti, R. (1997). Approaching geometry theorems in contexts: from history and epistemology to cognition. En E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the theInternational Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 180-195). Lahti, Finland: PME. Moschkovich, J. y Brenner, M. (2000). Integrating a naturalistic paradigm into research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. En A. Kelly y R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 457- 486). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781410602725.ch17 Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9057-x Perelman, C. y Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1989). Tratado de la Argumentación. (J. Sevilla, Trans.) Madrid: Editorial Gredos. Pino-Fan, L., Godino, J. D., & Font, V. (2018). Assessing key epistemic features of didactic-mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers: the case of the derivative. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(1), 63-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9349-8 Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Reid, D. y Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in Mathematics Education. Research, Learning and Teaching. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Rondero, C. y Font, V. (2015). Articulación de la complejidad matemática de la media aritmética. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(2), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1386 Steinhart, E. (2001). The Logic of Metaphor: Analogous Parts of Possible Worlds. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9654-1 Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Arguments (Actualización de 1 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005