Una mirada a las investigaciones internacionales sobre el conocimiento del profesor y problemas emergentes

Referencias

Ball, D., Thames, M. y Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-408. Black, A. y Halliwell, G. (2000). Assessing Practical Knowledge: How?, Why?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 103-115. Burghes, D. (2011). International Comparative Study in Mathematics Teacher Training. Rea- ding, Berkshire: CfBT. Obtenido de https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/en- GB/our-research/our-research-library/2011/r-international-comparative-study-in-ma- thematics-teacher-training-2011. Clandinin, D. J. (1985) Personal Practical Knowledge: A Study of Teachers’ Classroom Images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 361-385. Clarke, D. (2003). The Problematics of International Lesson Structure Comparisons. Padova, Italia: European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Obtenido de http://www.lps.iccr.edu.au/index.php/publications. Cochran-Smith, M. y Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. NY: Teachers College Press (ebook). da Ponte, J. P. y Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge and Practices. En A. Gutiérrez y P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathema- tics Education (pp. 461-494). Rotterdam, Países Bajos: Sense Publishers. Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L. y Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Systematic Review of the Way in. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12-25. Elbaz, F. (1981). The Teachers’ «Practical Knowledge»: Report of a Case Study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 43-71. Fennema, E. y Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ Knowledge and its Impact. En D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 147-164). New York: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994): The Knower and the Known: The Nature of Knowledge in Research on Teaching. Review of Research on Teaching, 20, 1-54. Gagatsis, A. y Nardi, E. (2016). Developmental, Sociocultural, Semiotic, and Affect Approaches to the Study of Concepts and Conceptual Development. En Á. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder y P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 187-234). Rotterdam: Sense. Gellert, U., Becerra Hernández, R. y Chapman, O. (2013). Research Methods in Ma- thematics Teacher Education. En K. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick y F. Leung (Eds.), Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 327-360). NY: Springer. Gómez, P. y Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, A. (2014). Conocimiento Matemático y Conocimiento Didáctico del Futuro Profesor. En M. T. González, M. Codes, D. Arnau y T. Ortega (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XVIII (pp. 99-114). Salamanca: SEIEM. Goffree, F. y Oonk, W. (2001). Digitalizing Real Teaching Practice for Teachers’ Education Programmes: The MILE Approach. En F.-L. Lin y T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 111-145). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Huillet, D. (2007). Teachers as Researchers: Putting Mathematics at the Core. En W. Jeong-Ho, L. Hee-Chan, P. Kyo-Sik y S. Dong-Yeop (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the IGPME, Vol. 3, (pp. 73-80). República de Korea: The Korean Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics. Kieran, C., Krainer, K. y Shaughnessy, M. J. (2013). Linking Research to Practice: Teachers as Key Stakeholders in Mathematics Education Research. En M.A. Clement (Ken), A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick y F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 361-392). NY: Spinger Science+Business Media. Lin, F.-L. y Rowland, T. (2016). Pre-service and In-service Mathematics Teachers’ Knowle- dge and Professional Development. En A. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder y P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education. The Journey Continues (pp. 483-513). Rotterdam, Países Bajos: Sense Publishers. McDonough, A. y Clarke, D. (2003). Describing the Practice of Effective Teachers of Ma- thematics in the Early Years. En N. Pateman, B. Dougherty y J. Zilliox (Eds.), Procee- dings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 261-268). Honolulu: College of Education, University of Hawaii. Miao, Z. (2015). The Effectiveness of Mathematics Teaching, A Cross-National Investigation in Primary Schools in England and China. Tesis para obtener el grado de Ph. D., Sou- thampton Univesity, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences Southampton Educational School, Southampton. Murillo, F. J. (2008). Hacia un Modelo de Eficacia Escolar. Estudio Multinivel sobre los Factores de Eficacia en las Escuelas Españolas. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 6(1), 4-28. Oonk, W. (2009). Theory-Enriched Practical Knowledge. Tesis de doctorado. Leiden Univer- sity. Recuperado de https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/13866. Petrou, M. y Goulding, M. (2011). Conceptualizing Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching. En T. Rowland y K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching (pp. 195-212). NY: Springer Science+Bussiness Media B. V. Scheerens, J. y Creemers, B. P. M. (1996). School Effectiveness in the Netherlands: The Modest Influence of a Research Programme. School Effectiveness and School Improve- ment, 7(2), 181-195. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Avebury: Aldershot Hants. Shulman, L. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educatio- nal Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Tatto, M. (Ed). (2013). The Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Technical Report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evalua- tion of Educational Achievement (IEA). Turner, F. y Rowland, T. (2011). The Knowledge Quartet as an Organizing Framework. En T. Rowland y K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching (pp. 195-212). NY: Springer Science+Bussiness Media B. V.