Toma de decisiones en el aula: estudios de caso de profesores de matemáticas
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Pinzón, Andrés y Gómez, Pedro
Resumen
La toma de decisiones del profesor es un foco importante de investigación de la cognición del profesor. En este artículo presentamos evidencia, a través de un estudio de casos de tres profesores de matemáticas, de cómo un modelo de toma de decisiones del profesor ante situaciones inesperadas permite describir este proceso a partir de cinco elementos: situación inesperada, propósito, las opciones consideradas, la valoración y la selección de una opción y la secuencia de acciones. Pudimos interpretar todas las situaciones analizadas con base en el modelo y consideramos que este puede usarse a futuro en estudios que permitan caracterizar los procesos de toma de decisiones de los profesores en estas situaciones.
Fecha
2021
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Referencias
Bishop, A. J. (2008). Decision-making, the intervening variable. En P. Clarkson y N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education. Major contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 29-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09673-5 Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E. y Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194 Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A. y Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting effective science teacher education and science teaching: A framework for teacher decision- making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 821-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9146-7 Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140 Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Kosko, K. W., Dimmel, J. y Erickson, A. (2016). Using multimedia questionnaires to study influences on the decisions mathematics teachers make in instructional situations. ZDM, 48, 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0727-y Hora, M. T. (2012). Organizational factors and instructional decision-making: A cognitive perspective. Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 207-235. Johnson, J. G. y Raab, M. (2003). Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 215- 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00027-X Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 456-460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385 Klein, G., Calderwood, R. y Clinton-Cirocco, A. (2010). Rapid decision making on the fire ground: The original study plus a postscript. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4(3), 186-209. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534310X12844000801203 Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000137349 Pinzón, A. y Gómez, P. (2019). Un modelo para la toma de decisiones del profesor de matemáticas. PNA, 13(3), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v13i3.7908 Remillard, J. T. y Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM, 46, 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4 Santagata, R. y Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM, 48, 153- 165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9 Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Models of the Teaching Process. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732- 3123(99)00031-0 Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). How we think: A theory of human decision-making, with a focus on teaching. En S. J. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 229-243). Springer. Shavelson, R. J. y Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051004455 Stigler, J. W., Gallimore, R. y Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3502_3 Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S. y Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Education Statistics Quarterly, 1(2), 109-112. Stockero, S. L. y Van Zoest, L. R. (2013). Characterizing pivotal teaching moments in beginning mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16, 125-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9222-3