Aprendizaje de la equidistancia a través de la variación: un estudio con niños de primaria

Referencias

Aravena, M., Gutiérrez, Á. y Jaime, A. (2016). Estudio de los niveles de razonamiento de Van Hiele en alumnos de centros de enseñanza vulnerables de educación media en Chile. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(1), 107-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1664 Camargo, L. y Sandoval, I. (2017). Acceso equitativo al razonamiento científico mediante la tecnología. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 73, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.73rce177.209 González, G. y Herbst, P. (2009). Students’ conceptions of congruency through the use of dynamic geometry software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(2), 153-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-009-9152-z Gu, L., Huang, R. y Marton, F. (2004). Teaching with variation: An effective way of mathematics teaching in China. En L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai y S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 309-345). Singapore: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812562241_0012 Healy, L. (2000). Identifying and explaining geometrical relationship: Interactions with robust and soft Cabri constructions. En T. Nakahara y M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 1, pp. 103-117). Hiroshima: Universidad de Hiroshima. Huang, R., Barlow, A. y Prince, K. (2016). The same tasks, different learning opportunities: An analysis of two exemplary lessons in China and the US from a perspective of variation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.12.001 Huang, R. y Li, Y. (Eds.) (2017). Teaching and learning mathematics through variation: Confucian heritage meets western theories. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5 Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Geometry. En L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of Teaching Secondary Mathematics: Perspectives on Practice (pp. 121-139). Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203165874 Jones, K. y Herbst, P. (2012). Proof, proving, and teacher-student interaction: Theories and contexts. En G. Hanna y M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (vol. 15, pp. 261-277). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_11 Jones, K. y Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. En A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder y P. Boero (Eds.), The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 109-149). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_4 Leung, A. (2003). Dynamic geometry and the theory of variation. En N. Pateman, B. Dougherty y J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceeding of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 197-204). Honolulu: PME. Leung, A. (2008). Dragging in a dynamic geometry environment through the lens of variation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13(2), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-008-9130-x Leung, A. (2015). Discernment and Reasoning in Dynamic Geometry Environments. En S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 451-469). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_26 Lo, M. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Mariotti, M. (2000). Introduction to proof: the mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012733122556 Marton, F. y Pang, M. F. (2009). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2 Marton, F., Runesson, U. y Tsui, A. (2004). The Space of Learning. En F. Marton y T. Amy (Eds.), Classroom Discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3-42). Nueva York: Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609762 MEN (Ministerio de Educación Nacional) (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguaje, matemáticas, ciencias y ciudadanas. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Morera, L., Fortuny, J. y Planas, N. (2012). Momentos clave en el aprendizaje de isometrías en un entorno colaborativo y tecnológico. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 30(1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v30n1.569 Mulligan, J. y Vergnaud, G. (2006). Research on children’s early mathematical development. En A. Gutiérrez y P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future (pp. 117-146). UK: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_006 Owens, K. y Outhred, L. (2006). The complexity of learning geometry and measurement. En A. Gutiérrez y P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future (pp. 83-115). UK: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_005 Pang, M., Bao, J. y Ki, W. (2017). «Bianshi» and the variation theory of learning: illustrating two frameworks of variation and invariance in the teaching of mathematics. En R. Huang y Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Variation (pp. 43-67). The Netherlands: Sense Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-782-5_3 Samper, C., Molina, O. y Echeverry A. (2013). Elementos de Geometría. Bogotá: Fondo editorial Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Sandoval, I. (2009). La geometría dinámica como una herramienta de mediación entre el conocimiento perceptivo y el geométrico. Educación Matemática, 21(1), 5-27. Sarama, J. y Clements, D. (2009). Early Childhood Mathematics Education Research: Learning Trajectories for Young Children. Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883785 SEP (Secretaría de Educación Pública) (2011). Programas de estudio 2011. Guía para el maestro. Educación Básica. Primaria. Quinto grado. México: Conaliteg. SEP (Secretaría de Educación Pública) (2013). Desafíos. Quinto grado. Docente. México: Conaliteg. SEP (Secretaría de Educación Pública) (2017). Aprendizajes Clave para la Educación Integral. Plan y Programas de Estudio para la Educación Básica. México: Conaliteg. Sinclair, N., Bussi, M., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A. y Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM, 48(5), 691-719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6 Soldano, C., Luz, Y., Arzarello, F. y Yerushamy, M. (2018). Technology-based inquiry in geometry: semantic games through the lens of variation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(1), 7-23. http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/s10649-018-9841-4 Steffe, L. y Thompson, P. (2000). Teaching Experiment Methodology: Underlying Principles and Essential Elements. En A. Kelly y R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 267-307). Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602725