Promote teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Bloch, Isabelle
Resumen
Students often get a very formal conception of mathematics during their mathematics studies. When they become teachers, this formal conception makes them both confident in a direct transmission of the knowledge and unable to tolerate approximate formulations from their own students. How can we make a teacher aware on the way mathematical knowledge appears in teaching? How can we help them understand the articulation between advanced mathematical notions and the content they will be teaching themselves? Their PCK – Pedagogical Content Knowledge, referring to Shulman – includes the ability to react in a pertinent mathematical way in their classroom. We study this PCK and we use Brousseau’s Theory of Didactical Situations to build situations to be experimented with student teachers. We give an account of the way student-teachers play situations and implement them in their classroom. An example of a situation on vectors is developed.
Fecha
2007
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Contenido | Contextos o situaciones | Desarrollo del profesor | Inicial | Reflexión sobre la enseñanza
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Educación media, bachillerato, secundaria superior (16 a 18 años) | Educación primaria, escuela elemental (6 a 12 años) | Educación secundaria básica (12 a 16 años)
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Referencias
AG ALMOULOUD, S. (2007). Fundamentos da didática da matemática. São Paulo, Educação Matemática. ARSAC, G.; BALACHEFF, N. & MANTE, M. (1992). Teacher’s role and reproducibility of didactical situations. ESM n. 23, pp. 5-29. Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers. ARTIGUE, M. (1998). L’évolution des problématiques en didactique de l’analyse. RDM, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 231-262. BERTE, A. (1993). Mathématiques du collège au lycée. Paris, Nathan Pédagogie. BERTHELOT, R. & BLOCH, I. (2001). Le rôle du professeur dans la gestion des situations: consigne et dévolution, mises en commun, clôture des séances du point de vue cognitif. XXVII ÈME COLLOQUE INTER-IREM DES FORMATEURS ET PROFESSEURS DE MATHÉMATIQUES. Actes... Grenoble, Université Joseph Fourier. BLOCH, I. (1999). L’articulation du travail mathématique du professeur et de l’élève dans l’enseignement de l’analyse en Première Scientifique. RDM, v. 19, n. 2, pp. 135-194. Grenoble, La Pensée Sauvage. (2003). Teaching functions in a graphic milieu: What forms of knowledge enable students to conjecture and prove? ESM, n. 52, pp. 3-28. (2005). “Dimension adidactique et connaissance nécessaire: un exemple de ‘retournement’ de situation”. In: CLANCHÉ, P. & ROUCHIER, A. (eds.) Sur la théorie des situations didactiques.Grenoble, La Pensée Sauvage. (2005). Learning new ways of teaching from mathematical research: Situations for Mathematics Teachers’ Education. Communication to ICMI 15 Study. Águas de Lindóia, Brazil. BROUSSEAU, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Mathematics Education Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nederlands. CASTELA, C. (2004). Institutions influencing mathematics students’ private work: A factor of academic achievement. ESM v. 57, n. 1, pp. 33-63. CASTELA, C. & EBERHARD, M. (1999) Quels types de modifications du rapport aux mathématiques en vue de la possibilité de quels gestes professionnels? X ème Ecole d’Eté de didactique des mathématiques. Actes... Houlgate, ARDM. CHARNAY, R. (1989). Les enseignants de mathématiques et les erreurs de leurs élèves. Grand N, n. 45, pp. 31-41. COLOMB, J.; DOUAIRE, J. & NOIRFALISE, R. (2003). Faire des maths en classe Didactique et analyse des pratiques enseignantes. Paris, INRP. COMITI, C. & BALL, N. (1996). “Preparing teachers to teach mathematics: a comparative perspective”. In: BISHOP, A. et alii (eds.). Handbook of Research in Mathematics Education, 1123-1154. Dordrecht, Kluwer A P. DREYFUS, T. (1999). Why Johnny can’t prove. Educational Studies in Mathematics, n. 38, pp. 85-109. HANA, G. & JAHNKE, N. (1993). Proof and application. Educational Studies in Mathematics, n. 24, pp. 421-438. HENRY, M. & CORNU, B. (2001). “‘Mathematics teachers’ education in France: from academic training to professionalization”. HOLTON, D. et alii (eds.). The Teaching and learning of Mathematics at University Level: an ICMI study. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. JAWORSKI, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnership. ESM, v. 54, n. 2-3, pp. 249-282. LEGRAND, M. (1993). Débat scientifique en cours de mathématiques. Repères IREM, n. 10. LENFANT, A. (2001). From a student institutional position to a teacher one: what changes in the relationship to algebra? Proceedings of the 25th Conference of PME. Netherlands, University of Utrecht. LIEURY, A. & FENOUILLET, F. (1997). Motivation et réussite scolaire. Paris, Dunod. LOUGHRAN, J.; BERRY, A. & MULBALL, P. (eds.) (2006). Understanding and developing Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Rotterdam, Sense Publishers. MALARA, N. & ZAN, R. (2002). The problematic relationship between theory and practice. Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. Lyn English Ed., LEA. MARGOLINAS, C. (2002). Situations, milieux, connaissances – Analyse de l’activité du professeur. 11 ème Ecole d’Eté de Didactique des Mathématiques. Actes... Grenoble, La Pensée Sauvage. RAUSCHER, J. C. (1999). Création d’un groupe de recherche sur l’écrit en 6 ème: quelles incidences sur les pratiques des enseignants? Educação Matemática Pesquisa, v. 1, n. 2. SACKUR, C. (2000). Experiencing the necessity of the mathematical statements. Proceedings of PME XXIV. Hiroshima, Japan. SALIN, M. H. (1999). Pratiques ostensives des enseignants et contraintes de la relation didactique. Le cognitif en didactique des mathématiques. Lemoyne & Conne (eds.). Presses de l’Université de Montréal. SCHWARZENBERGER, R. L. E. (1984). The importance of mistakes. The Mathematical Gazette, n. 68, pp. 159-172. SIERPINSKA, A. & LERMANN, S. (1996). Epistemologies of mathematics and mathematics education. BISHOP, A. et alii (eds.). Handbook of Research in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. VAN DOOREN, W.; VERSCHAFFEL, L. & ONGHENA, P. (2001). The impact of pre-service teachers’ content knowledge on their evaluation of students’ strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. JRME, v. 33-5, pp. 319-351.