Teacher interventions to induce students’ awareness in controlling their intuition

Referencias

AMARAL, N.; CARREIRA, S. Mathematical Creativity In The Solutions of Students Participating In A Problem-Solving Competition. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 31, n. 59, p. 880–906, dec. 2017. BABAI, R.; SHALEV, E.; STAVY, R. A Warning Intervention Improves Students’ Ability To Overcome Intuitive Interference. ZDM Mathematics Education, Karlsruhe, v. 47, n. 5, p. 735–745, jan. 2015. BAGO, B.; DE NEYS, W. Fast Logic ?: Examining The Time Course Assumption Of Dual Process Theory. Cognition, Paris, v. 158, p.90–109, jan. 2017. BALTACI, S.; YILDIZ, A.; GÜVEN, B. Knowledge Types Used By Eighth Grade Gifted Students While Solving Problems. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 28, n.50, p.1032–1055, dec. 2014. BELLINI-LEITE, S. C. Dual Process Theory: Systems, Types, Minds, Modes, Kinds Or Metaphors? A Critical Review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Heidelberg, v. 9, n. 2, p. 213-225, jun. 2018. BORODIN, A. The Need For An Application Of Dual-Process Theory To Mathematics Education. Cambridge Open-Review Educational Research E-Journal, Cambridge, v. 3, p. 1–31, sep. 2016. CĂPRIOARĂ, D. Problem Solving – Purpose And Means Of Learning Mathematics In School. Social And Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam, v. 191, p. 1859 – 1864, jun. 2015. CUNHA, C. L.; LAUDARES, J. B. Problem Solving In Financial Mathematics For The Treatment Of Financial Education Matters In High School. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 31, n. 58, p. 659–678, aug. 2017. DARMAWAN, P.; PURWANTO, P.; PARTA, I. N.; SUSISWO. The Levels of Students’ Feeling of Rightness (FOR) in Solving Polygon Perimeter Problems. International Journal of Instruction, Eskişehir, v. 13, n. 2, p. 549-566. apr. 2020. DE NEYS, W. Heuristic Bias And ConfliIct Detection During Thinking. In: ROSS, B. H. 1st ed. The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd., 2015. p. 1-32. DE NEYS, W. Dual Process Theory 2.0. New York: Routledge, 2018. DEWOLF, T.; DOOREN, W. V.; CIMEN, E. E.; VERSCHAFFEL, L. The Impact Of Illustrations And Warnings On Solving Mathematical Word Problems Realistically. The Journal Of Experimental Education, Milton, v. 82, n.1, p.103–120, jan. 2014. DOOREN, W. V.; BOCK, D.; DEPAEPE, F.; JANSSENS, D.; VERSCHAFFEL, L. The Illusion Of Linearity: Expanding The Evidence Towards Probabilistic Reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Heidelberg, v. 53, n. 2, p. 113–138, jul. 2003. DURNING, S. J.; DONG, T.; ARTINO, A. R.; SCHUWIRTH, L. Dual Processing. Perspectives on Medical Education, Heidelberg, v. 4, n. 4, p. 168–175, aug. 2015. EVANS, J. S. B. T. Spot The Difference: Distinguishing Between Two Kinds Of Processing. Mind & Society, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 1, p. 121–131, jun. 2012. EVANS, J. S. B. T. Dual Process Theory Perspectives, and problems. In: DE NEYS, W. 1st ed. Dual Process Theory 2.0. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 137-155. FISCHBEIN, E. Intuitions And Schemata In Mathematical Reasoning. Educational Studies In Mathematics, Heidelberg, v. 38, n. 1-3, p. 11–50, mar. 1999. FU, Q.; DIENES, Z.; FU, X. The distinction between intuition and guessing in the SRT taskgeneration: A reply to Norman and Price. Consciousness and Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 19, n. 1, p. 478-480. 2010. GILBERTSON, D.; WITT, J. C.; LAFLEUR, L. Supporting Teacher Use Of Interventions: Effects Of Response Dependent Performance Feedback On Teacher Implementation Of A Math Intervention. Journal Of Behavioral Education, New York, v. 16, p. 311–326, 2007. GUVEN, B.; OZUM, B. Factors Influencing Mathematical Problem-Solving Achievement Of Seventh Grade Turkish Students. Learning And Individual Differences, Amsterdam, v. 23, p. 131–137, feb. 2013. GREEN, D. R. survey of probabilistic concepts in 3000 students aged 11–16 years. In: GREY; HOLMES; BARNETT; CONSTABLE. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics. 1st ed. Sheffield: Teaching Statistics Trust, 1983. p. 766–783. HANDLEY, S. J.; TRIPPAS, D. Dual Processes And The Interplay Between Knowledge And Structure: A New Parallel Processing Model. In: ROSS, B. H. The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd., 2015. p. 33-58. IMBIR, K. K. New Ideas In Psychology From Heart To Mind And Back Again. A Duality Of Emotion Overview On Emotion-Cognition Interactions. New Ideas In Psychology, Amsterdam, v. 43, p. 39– 49, dec. 2016. JACINTO, H.; CARREIRA, S. Different Ways Of Using Geogebra In Mathematical Problem-Solving Beyond The Classroom: Evidences Of Techno-Mathematical Fluency. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 31, n. 57, p. 266–288, apr. 2017. KAHNEMAN, D. Maps Of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective On Intuitive Judgment. In: Nobel Prize lecture, 1st ed, Stockholm: Nobel Media AB, 2003. p. 449-489. LAMY, D.; LEBER, A.; EGETH, H. E. Effects Of Task Relevance And Stimulus-Driven Salience In Feature-Search Mode. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, Washington, v. 30, n. 6, p. 1019–031, 2004. LEM, S. The Intuitiveness Of The Law Of Large Numbers. Zdm Mathematics Education, Karlsruhe, v. 47, n. 5, p. 783–792, sep. 2015. LERON, U.; HAZZAN, O. Intuitive Vs Analytical Thinking: Four Perspectives. Educational Studies In Mathematics, Heidelberg, v. 71, n. 3, . 263–278, jul. 2009. LLERAS, A.; VON MÜHLENEN, A. Spatial Context And Top-Down Strategies In Visual Search. Spatial Vision, Leiden, v. 17, n. 4, p. 465–482, sep. 2004. MARTIN, J. W.; SLOMAN, S. A. Refining The Dual-System Theory Of Choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, Amsterdam, v. 23, n. 4, p. 552–555, oct. 2013. MIHAELA, F.; VOICA, C. Between Perception And Intuition: Learning About Infinity. Journal Of Mathematical Behavior, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 3, p. 188–205, 2008. MULLIS, I. V. S.; MARTIN, M. O.; FOY, P.; ARORA, A.Timss 2011 International Results In Mathematics. Chestnut Hill: Timss & Pirls International Study Center, 2012. NCTM. Principles And Standards For School Mathematics. Reston: The National Council of Teachers, 2000. OECD. Pisa 2015 Results In Focus. Paris: Oecd, 2018. PARSONS, C. Mathematical Thought And Its Objects. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. PENNYCOOK, G. A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual process models. In: DE NEYS, W. Dual Process Theory 2.0. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 5-27. SOUSA, C.; MENDES, F. Learning To Solve Problems In The 2nd Grade Of Elementary School. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 31, n. 2, p. 243–265, apr. 2017. SPINILLO, A. G.; LAUTERT, S. L.; BORBA, R. E. de S. R.; DOS SANTOS, E. M.; DA SILVA, J. F. G. The Posing Of Mathematical Problems Involving Multiplicative Structures By Elementary School Teachers. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 31, n. 59, p. 928–946, dec. 2017. STAVY, R.; TIROSH, D. How Students (Mis-)Understand Science And Mathematics: Intuitive Rules. New York: Teachers College Press, 2000. TAMBYCHIK, T.; SUBAHAN, T.; MEERAH, M. Students’ Difficulties In Mathematics Problem- Solving: What Do They Say? Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam, v. 8, n. 5, p. 142–151, 2010. THOMPSON, V. A.; JOHNSON, S. C. Conflict, Metacognition, And Analytic Thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, London, v. 20, n. 2, p. 37–41, sep. 2014. VESS, S. F.; BEGENY, J. C.; NORWalk, K. E.; ANKNEY, R. N. Reading Fluency Interventions With Middle School Students: A Comparison Of The Helps Program And A Teacher-Directed Evidence- Based Intervention. Journal Of Applied School Psychology, Thames, Oxfordshire, v. 34, n.2, p.1–22, 2018. WAGNER, D. L.; AARON, M. C. Comparing Brief Experimental Analysis And Teacher Judgment For Selecting Early Reading Interventions. Journal Of Behavioral Education, New York, v. 26, n. 4, p. 348–370,2017. WHEAR, R.; THOMPSON-COON, J.; BODDY, K.; FORD, T. The Effect Of Teacher-Led Interventions On Social And Emotional Behaviour In Primary School Children : A Systematic Review. British Educational Research Journal, Thames, Oxfordshire,v. 39, n. 2, p. 383–420, 2013. ZINK, C. F.; PAGNONI, G.; MARTIN-SKURSKI, M. E.; CHAPPELOW, J. C.; BERNS, G. S. Human Striatal Responses To Monetary Reward Depend On Saliency. Neuron, Amsterdam, v. 42, n. 3, p. 509–517, 2004.