Problem-based learning on the learning perseverance of indonesian senior high school students in solving mathematical problems
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Prastiti, Tri Dyah
Resumen
Students should be encouraged to achieve high order thinking skills, in which one of the ways to build the thinking skills is through solving mathematical problems. This study aimed to observe the effectiveness of a problem-based learning method and its effect on students’ perseverance in solving mathematical problems. The subjects of this research were science students at a Senior High School (SMAN) 2 Surabaya, Indonesia, selected with clustered random sampling. The research was conducted with an experimental design, and the problem-based learning method was applied in a Science 1 Class (experiment class), while a Science 4 Class was taught by following the conventional learning method designed by the teacher (control class), where the learning process was centered on the teacher and focused on the discipline. The instruments used in this research were the learning set for both learning methods, initial and final problem sets. The research results showed that the application of problem-based learning methods resulted in better learning outcomes. Moreover, the analysis of covariance showed that the application of a problem-based learning method is effective to develop students’ perseverance in solving mathematical problems.
Fecha
2020
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Aprendizaje | Métodos estadísticos | Resolución de problemas
Enfoque
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
34
Número
68
Rango páginas (artículo)
1206-1220
ISSN
19804415
Referencias
ARBAUGH, F.; LANNIN, J.; JONES, D. L.; PARK-ROGERS, M. Examining instructional practices in Core-Plus lessons: Implications for professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Heidelberg, v. 9, n. 6, p. 517-550, 2006. ARENDS, R. I. Learning to teach 9. ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012. BAHAR, A.; MAKER, C. J. Cognitive backgrounds of Problem Solving: A comparison of open ended vs. closed mathematics problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Derbyshire, v. 11, n. 6, p. 1531-1546, 2015. CADY, J.; MEIE, S. L.; LUBINSKI, C. A. The mathematical tale of two teachers: A longitudinal study relating mathematics instructional practices to level of intelectual development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, Heidelberg, v. 18, n. 1, p. 3–26, 2006. CAZDEN, C. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning 2. ed. Portsmouth: Heinemann, 2001. CHARLES, R.; LESTER, F.; O'DAFFER, P. How to evaluate progress in problem solving. Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1987. CHOPPIN, J. Learned adaptations: Teachers’ understanding and use of curricular resources. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Heidelberg, v. 14, n. 5, p. 331–353, 2011. COLLOPY, R. Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, Chicago, v. 103, n. 3, p. 227–311, 2003. DAVIS, J.; CHOPPIN, J.; ROTH-MCDUFFIE, A.; DRAKE, C. Common core state standards for mathematics: Middle school mathematics teachers’ perceptions. 2013. Available at: http://www.warner.rochester.edu/files/warnercenter/docs/commoncoremathreport.pdf. Access in: 17 feb. 2019. EDSON, A. J.; PHILLIPS, E.; SLANGER-GRANT, Y.; STEWART, J. The arc of learning framework: An ergonomic resourc for design and enactment of problem-based curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, Amsterdam, v. 92, p. 118-135, 2019. FRANKE, M. L.; WEBB, N. M.; CHAN, A. G.; ING, M.; FREUND, D.; BATTEY, D. Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematics thinking in elementar classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, Thousand Oaks, v. 60, n. 4, p. 380–392, 2009. HERBEL-EISENMANN, B. A.; STEELE, M. D.; CIRILLO, M. (Developing) teacher discourse moves: A framework for professional development. Mathematics Teacher Educator, Reston, v. 1, n. 2, p. 181–196, 2013. HO, K. F.; HEDBERG, J. G. Teachers’ pedagogies and their impact on students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, Amsterdam, v. 24, p. 238–252, 2005. HUFFERD-ACKLES, K.; FUSON, K.C.; SHERIN, M.G. Describing levels and componentes of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 35, n. 2, p. 81–116, 2004. KING, F. J.; GOODSON, L.; ROHANI, F. Higher order thinking skills. Centre for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. 2016. Available at: http://www.cala.fsu.edu/files/higher_order_thinking_skills.pdf. Access in: 17 feb. 2019. KURNIAWATI, E. Y.; DAFIK, D.; FATAHILLAH, A. Analisis Pola Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X IPA 2 SMAN 2 Jember dalam memecahkan masalah open-ended bangun datar dan bangun ruang. Edukasi, Jember, v. 3, n. 1, p. 18-23, 2016. LAPPAN, G. The challenges of implementation: Supporting teachers in reforming the third R: Changing the school mathematics curriculum. American Journal of Education, Chicago, v. 106, n. 1, p. 207–239, 1997. LAPPAN, G.; FITZGERALD, W. M., PHILLIPS, E. D.; WINTER, M. J. Middle grades mathematics project. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley, 1985. LAPPAN, G.; PHILLIPS, E. D. Challenges in US mathematics education through a curriculum development lens. Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, Nottingham, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1–19, 2009. LARSSON, M; RYVE, A. Balancing on the edge of competency-oriented versus procedural-oriented practices: Orchestrating whole-class discussions of complex mathematical problems. Mathematics Education Research Journal, Heidelberg, v. 24, n. 4, p. 447–465, 2012. LEATHAM, K. R.; PETERSON, B. E.; STOCKERO, S. L.; VAN-ZOEST, L.R. Conceptualizing mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities to build on student thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 46, n. 1, p. 88–124, 2015. LEIKIN, R.; ROSA, S. Learning through teaching: A case study on the development of a mathematics teacher’s proficiency in managing an inquiry-based classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, Heidelberg, v. 18, n. 3, p.44–68, 2006. LERCH, C. M. Control decisions and personal beliefs: Their effect on solving mathematics problem. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, Amsterdam, v. 23, n. 1, p. 21-36, 2004. LESTER, F. K.; CAI, J. Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In: FELMER P.; PEHKONEN E.; KILPATRICK, J. (ed.). Posing and solving mathematical problems, research in mathematics education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 117–135. LI, Y.; LAPPAN, G. Mathematics curriculum in school education. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. LODICO, M. G.; SPAULDING, D. T.; VOEGTLE, K. H. Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. LUBIENSKI, S. T. Problem-centered teaching. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, Reston, v. 5, n. 4, p. 250–255, 1999. MAHENDRA, Y. B. Proses berpikir kreatif siswa kelas XA SMA Negeri 1 gedangan dalam memecahkan masalah matematika pada materi peluang dengan soal higher order thinking ditinjau dari tingkat berpikir kreatif. MATHEdunesa, Surabaya, v. 1, n. 4, p. 131-140, 2015. MAIRING, J. P. Kemampuan siswa SMA dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel. Aksioma, Metro, p. 15-26, 2017. PIMTA, S. L; TAYRUAKHAM, S.; NUANGCHALERM, P. Factors influencing mathematics problem solving ability of sixth grade students. Journal of Social Sciences, New York, v. 5, n. 4, p. 381–385, 2009. POLYA, G. How to solve it. 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973. POLYA, G. Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981. PRASTITI, T. D.; YUMIATI; MAIRING J. P.; HANDAYANI, E. P. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Mahasiswa Berbasis REACT pada Tutorial Statistika Pendidikan di Universitas Terbuka. Jurnal AdMathEdu, Yogyakarta, v. 7, n. 1, p. 61-72, 2017. PRASTITI, T. D.; TRESNANINGSIH, S.; MAIRING, J. P. Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMAN di Suabaya. Jurnal AdMathEdu, Yogyakarta, v. 8, n. 1, p. 83-94, 2018. RESNICK, L. Education and learning to think. Washington: National Academy Press, 1987. RUTHERFORD, A. Introducing anova and ancova: A GLM approach. London: Sage Publications, 2001. SAHRUDIN, A. Implementasi strategi pembelajaran discovery untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan motivasi belajar siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika, Karawang, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1–12, 2014. SARI, N. Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan pembelajaran konvensional pada mahasiswa STMIK di kota Medan. Jurnal Saintech, Jakarta, v. 6, n. 4, p. 106–111, 2014. SCHOENFELD, A. Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, Washington, v. 28, n. 7, p. 4-14, 1999. SMITH, M.; STEIN, M. K. Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston: NCTM, 2011. STAPLES, M. Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, Germantown, v. 25, n. 2, p. 161–217, 2006. STEIN, K. M; REMILLARD, J.; SMITH, M. How curriculum influences student learning. In: FRANK, K.; LESTER, J. (ed.). Second handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 2007. p. 319–369. SULLIVAN, P.; AULERT, A.; LEHMANN, A.; HISLOP, B.; SHEPHERD, O.; STUBBS, A. Classroom culture, challenging mathematical tasks and student persistence. In: STEINLE, V.; BALL, L.; BARDINI, C. (ed.). Proceedings of the 36th Teacher moves for supporting student reasoning anual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Melbourne: insert publisher, 2013. p. 618–625. TRUXAW, M. P.; DEFRANCO, T. Mapping mathematics classroom discourse and its implications for models of teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, v. 39, n. 5, p. 489– 525, 2008. USA. Common core state standards for mathematics. 2010. Available at: http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf. Access in 17 feb. 2019. WIRKALA, C.; KUHN, D. Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, Thousand Oaks, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1157– 1186, 2011. ZOHAR, A.; DORI, Y.A. Higher-order thinking skills and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, Germantown, v. 12, n. 2, p. 145-181, 2003.