A Viennese Wittgenstein? A response to Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Peters, Michael A.
Resumen
In response to Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé, Michael Peters writes “A Viennese Wittgenstein? A response to Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé” in order to reveal that his process of reading Wittgenstein or any philosopher, opposing ideas through others, is part of the language game of philosophy and often brings benefits in terms of understanding.
Fecha
2022
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Comprensión | Desde disciplinas académicas | Otro (fundamentos)
Enfoque
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
12
Número
2
Rango páginas (artículo)
19-22
ISSN
22380345
Referencias
Bouveresse, J. (1995) Wittgenstein Reads Freud. Princeton University Press. Egan, D., Reynolds, S., Wendland, A. (2013) eds. Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Routledge. Glock, H-J (2004) Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher? Metaphilosophy, 35(4): 419-444, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00329.x Hacker, P.M.S. (1996) Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Blackwell. Peters, M.A. (2019) The ethics of reading Wittgenstein, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51:6, 546-558, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1455394 Peters, M.A. (2020) Pedagogical Investigations: Wittgenstein and education, Educ. Real. 45 (3), https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236106758. Peters, M.A. & Marshall, J.D. (1999) Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Postmodernism, Pedagogy. Bergin & Garvey. Peters, M.A. & Stickney, J. (2019) Wittgenstein at Cambridge: Philosophy as a way of life, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51:8, 767-778, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1524704