Investigation of eighth-grade students’ understanding of the slope of the linear function

Referencias

ACUNA, C. Use of slope and y-intercept in prediction and description, as seen from students’ perspective. In: CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 3rd, 2007, Bellaria. Proceedings… Bellaria, Italy, 2007. BAKI, A. Bilgisayar destekli matematik . Ankara: Ceren . 2002. BAKI, A.; ÖZTEKIN, B. Teaching functions through Excel. Gazi University Kastamonu Education Journal, Turkey, v. 11, n. 2, p. 325 - 338. 2003. BARR, G. Graphs, gradients and intercepts. Mathematics in School, London, GB, v. 9, n. 1, p. 5 - 6. 1980. BELL, A.; JANVIER, C. The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics, Montreal, Canada, v. 2, n. 1, p. 34 - 42. 1981. BIRGIN, O.; KUTLUCA, T.; GÜRBÜZ, R. The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the students’ achievement in mathematics at seventh grade. In: INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE 8th, 2008, Ankara. Proceedings…Ankara: Nobel Press. 2008. p. 879 – 882. CARPENTER, T. P.; CORBIT, M. K.; KEPNER, H. S.; LINDQUIST, M. M.; REYS, R. E.Results from the second mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1981 CHIU, M. M.; KESSEL, C.; MOSCHKOVICH, J.; MUNOZ-NUNEZ, A. Learning tograph linear functions: a case study of conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, Mahwah, NJ, v. 19, n. 2, p. 215 - 252. 2001. COHEN, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Durham, NC, v. 20, n. 1, p. 37 - 46. 1960 DAVIS, J. D. Real-world contexts, multiple representations, student-invented terminology, and Intercept. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, England, v. 9, n. 4, p. 387 - 418. 2007. EISENBURG, T. On the development of a sense for functions. In: HAREL, G.; DUBINSKY, E. (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy. Mathematical Association of America. 1992. p. 153 - 174, v. 25. GRAHAM, T.; SAHARP, J. An investigation into able students’ understanding of motion graphs. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, Oxford, Inglaterra, v. 18, n. 3, p. 128 - 135. 1999. HITT, F. Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Norwood, NJ, v. 17, n. 1, p. 123 - 134. 1998. ISIKSAL, M.; ASKAR, P. The effect of spreadsheet and dynamic geometry software on the achievement and self-efficacy of 7th grade students. Educational Research, Oxfordshire, Inglaterra, v. 47, n. 3, p. 333 - 350. 2005. JANVIER, C. Use of situations in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 12, p. 113 - 122. 1981. ,Ý.; GÜVEN B. The development of function concept in different levels of students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Turkey, v. 16, p. 64 - 73. 2004. KERSLAKE, D. Graphs. In: HART, K. (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11-16. London: John Murray, 1981. p. 120 - 136. KNUTH, E. J. Student understanding of the Cartesian connection: an exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, Va, v. 31, p. 500 - 507. 2000. KONDRATIEVA, M. F.; RADU, O. Fostering connections between the verbal, algebraic, and geometric representations of basic planar curves for student’s success in the study of mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, USA, v. 6, n. 1-2, p. 213 - 238. 2009. LEINHARDT, G.; ZASLAVSKY, O.; STEIN, M. K. Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, Washington, US, v. 60, p. 1 - 64. 1990. LLOYD, G. W.; WILSON, M. Supporting innovation: the impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, Va, v. 29, n. 3, p. 248 - 274. 1998. MARKOVITZ, Z.; EYLON, B.; BRUKHEIMER, M. Functions: Linearity unconstrained. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONALGROUP FOR THE PME, 7th, 1983, Rehovot, Israel. Proceedings… Rehovot, Israel: Weitzman Institute. 1983. p. 271 - 277 (HERSHKOWITZ, R. (Ed.)). MEVARECH, Z. R.; KRAMARSKY, B. From verbal descriptions to graphic representations: stability and change in students’ alternative conceptions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 32, n. 1, p. 229 - 263. 1997. MOSCHKOVICH, J. Moving up and getting steeper: negotiating shared descriptions of linear graphs. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Mahwah, NJ, v. 5, n. 3, p. 239 - 277. 1996. MOSCHKOVICH, J. Students’ use of the x-intercept as an instance of a transitional conception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 37, p. 169 - 197. 1999. MOSCHKOVICH, J. Appropriating mathematical practice: a case study of learning to use and explore functions through interaction with a tutor. Educational Studies in Mathematics Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 55, p. 49 - 80. 2004. NATHAN, M. J.; KIM, S. Pattern generalization with graphs and words: a cross- sectional and longitudinal analysis of middle school students’ representational fluency. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, England, v. 9, n. 3, p. 193 - 219. 2007. NCTM. Principles and standards for school mathematics. VA: Reston. 2000. NEMIROVSKY, R. On mathematical visualization and the place where we live. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 33, p. 99 - 131. 1997. NOSS, R.; BAKI, A. Liberating school mathematics from procedural view. Journal of Education Hacettepe University, Turkey, v. 12, p. 179 - 182. 1996. ORTON, A. Understanding rate of change. Mathematics in School, London, GB, v. 13, n. 5, p. 23 - 26. 1984. PADILLA, M.; MCKENZIE, D. L.; SHAW, E. L. An examination of the line graphing ability of students in grades seven through twelve. School Science and Mathematics, Menasha, Wis., US, v. 86, p. 20 - 26. 1986. RIDER, R. L. Using the SOLO taxonomy to evaluate student learning of function concepts in developmental algebra. In: NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICSEDUCATION, 2004, Toronto, Canada. Proceeding…Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of University of Toronto. 2004. RIZZITU, J. M. Students’ conceptualizations of mathematics functions: the effect of a pedagogical approach involving multiple representations.1991. Thesis (Doctoral in Mathematics Education) - Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1991. (52-10A, 3549). SCHOENFELD, A. H.; SMITH, J. P.; ARCAVI, A. Learning: the microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In: GLASER, R. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1993. p. 55 - 175, v. 4. SHERIN, M. G. When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, Mahwah, NJ, v. 20, n. 2, p. 119 - 150. 2002 SMITH, J.; ARCAVI, A.; SCHOENFELD, A. H. Learning y-intercept: assembling the pieces of an atomic concept. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS, 13th, 1989, Paris. Proceedings… Paris, France: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.1989. p. 174 - 181,v. 3. STRAUSS, A.; CORBIN, J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage. 1990. STUMP, S. L. Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of the concept of slope.1996. Thesis (Doctoral in… area of doctoral) - Illinois State University, Illinois. 1996. STUMP, S. L. High school precalculus students’ understanding of slope as measure.School Science and Mathematics, Menasha, Wis., US, v. 101, p. 81 - 89. 2001 ZASLAVSKY, O.; SELA, H.; LERON, U. Being sloppy about slope: the effect of changing the scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, Holanda, v. 49, p. 119 - 140. 2002.