Japanese and Swedish mathematics teacher educators’ pedagogical content Knowledge – an institutional perspective

Referencias

Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty Years Later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain auseful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. Asami-Johansson, Y., & Attorps, I. (2015). Applying the structured problem solving in teacher education in Japan – a case study. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 2741–2747). Prague: Charles University and ERME. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Bertram, A., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teachers’ views on CoRes and Pap-eRs as a framework for articulating and developing pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Science Education, 42, 1027–1047. DOI 10.1007/s11165-011-9227-4 Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2006). Twenty-five years of the didactic transposition. ICMI Bulletin, 58, 51-63. Brorsson, Å. (2013). Prima Matematik 1A/1B. Malmö: Gleerups. Chevallard, Y. (1992). A theoretical approach to curricula. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 13, 215-230. Falck, P., Picetti, M., & Elofsdotter Meijer, S. (2011). Matte Safari Direkt 1A/1B. Stockholm: Sanoma. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press. Hemmi, K. & Ryve, A. (2015). Effective mathematics teaching in Finnish and Swedish teacher education discourses. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 18 (6), 501-521. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45 (2), 169–204. Liljedahl, P. et al. (2009). Components of mathematics teacher training. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional Education and Development of teachers of Mathematics (pp. 25–33). New York: Springer. Löwing, M., & Kilborn, V. (2002). Baskunskaper i matematik: för skola, hem och samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Loughran, J.J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Ministry of education, culture, sports, science and technology (MEXT) (2008a). Shin gakushu shido yoryo, ikiru chikara. Shougakko gakushu shido yoryo suugaku-hen [The New Course of Study – zest for life. Curriculum standard for elementary school, mathematics]. Tokyo: Kyouiku Shuppan. Ministry of education, culture, sports, science and technology (MEXT) (2008b). Shougakko gakushu shido yoryo kaisetsu, sansuu-hen [Guidelines of the course of study for elementary school, mathematics]. Tokyo: Kyouiku Shuppan. The Ministry of Education and Research (2010). Bäst i klassen – en ny lärarutbildning [Top of the class – a new teacher education]. http://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/c0d91cff5e4d4223b15334ce441cd00a/bast-i-klassen---en-ny-lararutbildning-prop.-20091089 Miyakawa, T. (2010). Introducing the unit with comparison: Difference and construction of Units. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education. 92 (12) 72-73. Rystedt, E., & Trygg, L. (2010). Laborativ matematikundervisning – vad vet vi? [Lessons with manipulatives – what do we know about this?]. Göteborg: Nationellt centrum för matematikutbildning (NCM). Seki, S., & Hashimoto, Y. (Eds.). (2008). Tanoshii sansuu 1 [Fun Mathematics for Grade 1]. Tokyo: Dainihon tosho. Shimizu, S., Hunakoshi, S., Negami, I., & Teragaki, S. (Eds.). (2014). Wakuwaku sansuu 1 [Exiting Mathematics for Grade 1]. Tokyo: Keirinkan. Shimizu, Y. (1999). Aspect of mathematics teacher education in japan: Focusing in teachers’ roles. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 107-116. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4–14. Skolverket. (2011a). Curriculum for the compulsory school, pre-school class and the recreation centre. Stockholm: Skolverket. Skolverket. (2011b). Kommentarmaterial till kursplanen i matematik [Comment-ary materials for the curriculum in mathematics]. Stockholm: Skolverket. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The free press. Winsløw, C. (2012). A comparative perspective on teacher collaboration: The case of lesson study in Japan and of multidisciplinary teaching in Denmark. In G. Gueudet et al. (Eds.), From Text to ‘Lived’ Resources, Mathematics Teacher Education 7, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_15. Springer.