Analysis of self-regulated learning at each level of mathematical creative thinking skill
Tipo de documento
Autores
Dwijanto | Kartono | Munahefi, Detalia Noriza | Waluya, Budi
Lista de autores
Munahefi, Detalia Noriza, Kartono, Waluya, Budi y Dwijanto
Resumen
Most individuals do not understand creative mathematical thinking only as a cognitive factor, whereas creative mathematical thinking plays a role in affective factors. Self-regulated learning is considered an affective factor that influences mathematical creative thinking skill. The purpose of this study determines the effect of SRL on mathematical creative thinking skill and analyzes in detail the components of SRL at each level of creative mathematical thinking. This study uses an explanatory sequential combination research design. The study population was high school students at SMAN 3 Klaten. The sampling technique used in this study is simple random sampling. The research sample measured mathematical creative thinking ability ( Y ) as a dependent variable, and SRL consists of three components, namely metacognition ( X1 ), motivation ( X2 ), and behavioristic ( X3 ). At the same time, the research subject selection technique is purposive sampling. The researcher chose to divide students' mathematical creative thinking skills into three levels: high, medium, low, where in each level was selected three research subjects. SRL has a positive effect on the ability to think mathematically creative by 85.4%. Metacognitive has the strongest influence on mathematical creative thinking skills. The SRL component has a role in every aspect of creative mathematical thinking consisting of fluency, flexibility, elaboration, and originality. Therefore, for improving mathematical creative thinking skills, students should be given learning based on SRL.
Fecha
2022
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Cognición | Métodos estadísticos | Otro (métodos) | Pensamientos matemáticos
Enfoque
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
36
Número
72
Rango páginas (artículo)
580-601
ISSN
19804415
Referencias
AKGUL, S.; KAHVECI, N. G. A Study on the Development of a Mathematics Creativity Scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Ankara, v. 62, p. 57-76, 2016. AKGÜL, S.; KAHVECI, N. G. Developing a Model to Explain the Mathematical Creativity of Gifted Students. European Journal of Education Studies, Ankara, v. 3, n. 8, p. 125-147, 2017. AL-ZU’BI, M. A. A.; OMAR-FAUZEE, M. S.; KAUR, A. The Relationship between Creative Thinking and Motivation to Learn Creative Thinking Among Pre-Schoolers in Jordan. European Journal of Education Studies, Ankara, v. 3, p. 426-442, 2017. ALTUN, S.; ERDEN, M. Self-regulation based learning strategies and self-efficacy perceptions as predictors of male and female students' mathematics achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Istanbul, v. 106, p. 2354-2364, 2013. BART, W. M.; HOKANSON, B; SAHIN, I.; ABDELSAMEA, M. A. An investigation of the Gender differences in creative thinking ability among 8th and 11th grade students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, Cambridge, v. 17, p. 17-24, 2015. BAUMEISTER, R. F.; HEATHERTON, T. F. Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, Ohio, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-15, 1996. BIRGILI, B. Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Istanbul, v. 2, n. 2, p. 71-80, 2015. BISHARA, S. Self-regulated math instructions for pupils with learning disability. Cogent Education, Hongkong, p. 3, v. 1, p. 1-14, 2016. BOEKAERTS, M. Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, Leiden, v. 30, n. 4, p. 195-200, 1995. CARVER, C. S.; SCHEIER, M. F. Self-regulation of affect and action. In: ORGANIZER'S NAME, Abbreviated Name (org.). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: publisher, 2011. p. 3-21. v. 2. CHAMBERLIN, S. A.; MOON, S. M. Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, Waco, v. 17, n. 1, p. 37-47, 2005. CLEARY, T. J.; KITSANTAS, A. Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement. School Psychology Review, Bethesda, v. 46, n. 1, p. 88-107, 2017. CRESWELL, J. W. 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. London: Sage Publications, 2015. DU TOIT, S.; KOTZE, G. Metacognitive strategies in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras, Bloemfontein, v. 70, p. 57-67, 2009. EISENBERGER, R.; SHANOCK, L. Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, Delaware, v. 15, n. 2-3, p. 121-130, 2003. ERBAS, A. K.; BAS, S. The contribution of personality traits, motivation, academic risk-taking and metacognition to the creative ability in mathematics. Creativity Research Journal, Ankara, v. 27, n. 4, p. 299-307, 2015. FAUZI, K.; AMIN, M.; DIRGEYASE, I. W.; PRIYATNO, A. Building Learning Path of Mathematical Creative Thinking of Junior Students on Geometry Topics by Implementing Metacognitive Approach. International Education Studies, Medan, v. 12, n. 2, p. 57-66, 2019. FAST, L. A.; LEWIS, J. L.; BRYANT, M. J.; BOCIAN, K. A.; CARDULLO, R. A.; RETTIG, M.; HAMMOND, K. A. Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, California, v. 102, n. 3, p. 729, 2010. HADWIN, A.; OSHIGE, M. Socially shared regulation: Exploring perspectives of social in self-regulated learning theory. Teachers College Record, British Columbia, v. 113, n. 2, p. 65-84, 2011. HARGROVE, R. A.; NIETFELD, J. L. The impact of metacognitive instruction on creative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, Lexington, p. 83, n. 3, p. 291-318, 2015. HAYLOCK, D. Recognising Mathematical Creativity in School children. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, Norwich, v. 29, n. 3, p. 68-74, 1997. IBRAHIM, M. M.; ARSHAD M. Y.; ROSLI, M. S. The Need of an Integrated Framework for the Implementation of Blended Problem-Based Learning. International Education Studies, Johor, v. 8, p.13. n. 33-40, 2015. IVCEVIC, Z.; NUSBAUM, E. C. From having an idea to doing something with it: Self-regulation for creativity. In: MACIEJ KARWOWSKI & JAMES C. KAUFMAN,. The creative self. New Haven: Elsevier Inc, 2017. p. 343-365. KHUZIAKHMETOV, A. N.; GOREV, P. M. Introducing learning creative mathematical activity for students in extra mathematics teaching. Bolema, Rio Claro, v. 31, n. 58, p. 642-658, 2017. KIM, H.; CHO, S.; AHN, D. Development of mathematical creative problem-solving ability test for identification of the gifted in math. Gifted Education International, Seoul, v. 18, p. 164-174, 2003. KRAMARSKI, B.; MIZRACHI, N. Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, Tel Aviv, v. 99, n. 4, p. 218-231, 2006. KRAMARSKI, B.; GUTMAN, M. How can self‐regulated learning be supported in mathematical E‐learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Ramat Gan, v. 22, n. 1, p. 24-33, 2006. KWAN, Y. W.; WONG, A. F. The constructivist classroom learning environment and its associations with critical thinking ability of secondary school students in Liberal Studies. Learning Environments Research, New York, v. 17, n. 2, p. 191-207, 2014. LEE, M. K.; ERDOGAN, I. The effect of science–technology–society teaching on students’attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, Seoul, v. 29, n. 11, p. 1315-1327, 2007. PEHKONEN, E. The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. ZDM- International Journal on Mathematics Education, Helsinki, v. 29, n. 3, p. 63–67, 1997. PUSPITASARI, L.; IN'AM, A.; SYAIFUDDIN, M. Analysis of Students’ Creative Thinking in Solving Arithmetic Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, East Sussex , v. 14, n. 1, p. 49-60, 2018. RESCHLY, A. L.; HUEBNER, E. S.; APPLETON, J. J.; ANTARAMIAN, S. Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents' engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, Muncie , v. 45, n. 5, p. 419-431, 2008. RUBENSTEIN, L. D.; RIDGLEY, L. M.; CALLAN, G. L.; KARAMI, S.; EHLINGER, J. How teachers perceive factors that influence creativity development: Applying a Social Cognitive Theory perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, Reykjavík , v. 70, p. 100-110, 2018. RUNCO, M. A.; ACAR, S. Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, Norman, v. 24, n. 1, p. 66-75, 2012. SAFITRI, M.; KUNTJORO, S. Metacognitive Strategies to Train Creative Thinking Skills in Creating Media for Learning. In: ORGANIZER'S NAME, Abbreviated Name (org.). Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018). Surabaya: Atlantis Press, 2018. p. 231-233. SAK, U.; J, MAKER. Developmental Variation in Children's Creative Mathematical Thinking as a Function of Schooling, Age, and Knowledge. Creativity Research Journal, Norman, v. 18, n. 3, p. 279-291, 2006. SCHNELL, K.; RINGEISEN, T.; RAUFELDER, D.; ROHRMANN, S. The impact of adolescents' self-efficacy and self-regulated goal attainment processes on school performance —Do gender and test anxiety matter? Learning and Individual Differences, Texas, v. 38, p. 90-98, 2015. SCHRAW, G.; CRIPPEN, K. J.; HARTLEY, K. Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, Springfield, v. 36, n. 1-2, p. 111-139, 2006. SCHUNK, D. H.; ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Self‐regulation and learning. In W. M. REYNOLDS, G. E. MILLER, & I. B. WEINER (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. Wangshinton DC: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. p. 45-68 v. 7. SCOTT, G.; LERITZ, L. E.; MUMFORD, M. D. The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review. Creativity Research Journal, Norman, v. 16, n. 4, p. 361–388, 2004. SHRIKI, A. Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Utrecht, v. 73, n. 2, p. 159-179, 2010. SILVER, E. A. Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, Hamburg , v. 29, n. 3, p. 75–80, 1997. STERNBERG, R. J.; GRIGORENKO, E. L.; SINGER, J. L. Creativity: From potential to realization. New York American Psychological Association, 2004. SUDIJONO, A. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Rajawali Pers: publisher, 2009. SUN, Z.; XIE, K.; ANDERMAN, L. H. The role of self-regulated learning in students’ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, Florida v. 36, p. 41–53, 2018. TANDISERU, S. R. The Effectiveness of Local Culture-Based Mathematical Heuristic-KR Learning towards Enhancing Student's Creative Thinking Skill. Journal of Education and Practice, Constanta, v. 6, n. 12, p. 74-81, 2015. TUNCA, N. The regression level of constructivist learning environment characteristics on classroom environment characteristics supporting critical thinking. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Ankara, v. 60, p. 181–200, 2015. WANG, J. C. K.; NG, B. L.; LIU, W. C.; RYAN, R. M. Can being autonomy-supportive in teaching improve students' self-regulation and performance? In: ORGANIZER'S NAME, Abbreviated Name (org.). Building autonomous learners. Singapore: Springer, 2016. p. 227-243. ZIMMERMAN, B. J. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of educational psychology, Constanța, v. 81, n. 3, p. 329, 1989. ZIMMERMAN, B. J. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, Nashville, v. 45, n. 1, p. 166-183, 2008.