Argumentación matemática basada en refutaciones

Referencias

Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Conner, A. (2008). Expanded Toulmin diagrams: a tool for investigating complex activity in classrooms. En O. Figueras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.). Proceedings of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol 2, pp. 361-368). México, Morelia. Conner, A., Singletary. L., Smith. R., Wagner. P., y Francisco, R. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities, Educational Studies Mathematics, 86 (2), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8 Cervantes-Barraza, J. A. y Cabañas-Sánchez, G. (2018). Argumentos formales y visuales en argumentaciones colectivas. Educación Matemática, 30(1), 148-168. Cabañas-Sánchez, G. y Cervantes-Barraza, J. A. (2019) Principios que fundamentan el diseño de tareas matemáticas en una planificación didáctica. Revista Uno, 85, 7-12. Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., Cabañas-Sánchez, G. y Mercado-Porras, K. (2020). El rol del profesor en la construcción de conocimiento matemático a través de la argumentación colectiva. En H. Hernández, J. Juárez, J. Slisko (Eds.). Tendencias en la Educación Matemática Basada en la Investigación, PP. 214-2. Cervantes-Barraza, J. & Cabañas-Sánchez, G. (2021). Teacher promoting student mathematical arguments through questions. En M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Interim Vol. (pp. 81-89). Khon Kaen, Thailand: PME Gal, H., y Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649- 010-9232-y Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modeling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8 Inglis, M., y Mejia-Ramos J. (2005). La fuerza de la aserción y el poder persuasivo en la argumentación en matemáticas. Revista EMA: Investigación e Innovación en Educación Matemática, 10, 327-352. Kaur, H., y Sinclair, N. (2014). Young children’s thinking about various types of triangles in a dynamic geometry environment. In C. Nicole, S. Oesterle, P. Lijedahl, & D. Allan, (Eds.) Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, (Vol. 5, pp. 113-120). Vancouver, Canada. Knipping, C., y Reid D. (2015). Reconstructing argumentation structures: A Perspective on proving Processes in Secondary Mathematics Classroom Interactions. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping y N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 75-101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_4 Ko, Y.Y. y Knuth, E. (2009). Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28 (1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.005 Komatzu, K., y Jones, K. (2017). Proofs and refutations in school mathematics: A task design in dynamic geometry environments. In Thérèse Dooley, Viviane Durand-Guerrier, Ghislaine Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 104-112). Dublin, Ireland. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnology of argumentation. In P. Cobb and H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning: Interaction in Classroom Cultures (pp. 229–269). Erlbaum. Krummheuer, G. (2015). Methods for Reconstructing Processes of Argumentation and Participation in Primary Mathematics Classroom Interaction. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping., & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 75-101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_3 Larios, V., Arellano, C., y Gonzalez, N. (2018). Análisis de Argumentos Producidos por Alumnos de Bachillerato al Resolver Problemas de Geometría. REDIMAT, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7(2), 280-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2018.2343 Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2 Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Matemáticas. Bogotá, D. C. Molina, M., Castro, E., Molina, J., y Castro, E. (2012).Un acercamiento a la investigación de diseño a través de los experimentos de enseñanza. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 29(1), 075–088 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author. Pedemonte, B., & Balacheff, N. (2016). Establishing links between conceptions, argumentation and proof through the ck¢-enriched Toulmin model, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 104–122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.008 Ponte, J. P. (2005). Gestão curricular em Matemática. In GTI (Ed.), O professor e o desenvolvimento curricular (pp. 11-34). APM. Rassmusean Reid, D., Knipping, C. y Crosby, M. (2011). Refutations and the logic of practice. PNA, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v6i1.6148 Reid, D., y Vallejo, E. (2017). Proof-based teaching as a basis for understanding why. In T. Dooley, V. Durand-Guerrier, & Gueudet. G (Eds.), Proceedings of Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp.9-17), Dublin, Ireland. Rumsey, C., & Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation. Teaching children mathematics, 22(7), 413-419. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.22.7.0412 Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) (2011). Plan de estudios. México, Distrito federal Smith, M., & Stein, M. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical task, form research to practice. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 3(5), 344-350. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.5.0344 Solar, H. y Delofeu, J. (2016). Condiciones para promover el desarrollo de la competencia de argumentación en el aula de matemáticas. Bolema, 30(56), 1092- 1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v30n56a13 Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. Toulmin, S., Rieke. R., y Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning(2nd ed.). Macmillan Whitenack, J., y Knipping, N. (2002). Argumentation, instructional design theory and student’s mathematical learning: a case for coordinating interpretive lenses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00144-X Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423– 440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8