The conjecturing process: perspectives in theory and implications in practice

Referencias

Allen, L. G. (2001). Teaching mathematical induction: An alternative approach. Mathematics Teacher, 94, 500-504. Arzarello, F., Gallino, G., Micheletti, C., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (1998). Dragging in Cabri and modalities of transition from conjectures to proofs in geometry. In A. Olivier and K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 32-39). Stellenbosch, South Africa. Bergqvist, T. (2005). How students verify conjectures: Teachers’ expectations. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 171-191. Cañadas, M. C. (2002). Razonamiento inductivo puesto de manifiesto por alumnos de secundaria. Granada: University of Granada. Cañadas, M. C. & Castro, E. (2005). A proposal of categorisation for analysing inductive reasoning. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the CERME 4 International Conference (pp. 401-408). Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. Published online at http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4/ De Guzmán, M. (1996). El rincón de la pizarra. Ensayos de visualización en análisis matemático. Pirámide, Madrid. Duval, R. (1990). Pour une approche cognitive de l’argumentation. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 3, 195-221. Figueiras, L. & Deulofeu, J. (2005). Visualising and conjecturing solutions for Heron’s problem. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the CERME 4 International Conference (pp. 420-427). Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. Published online at http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4/ Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. An educational approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. Furinghetti, F. & Paola, D. (2003). To produce conjectures and to prove them within a dynamic geometry environment: A case study. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Doherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 397-404). Honolulu, USA. Goldin, G. A. & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2001 Yearbook (pp. 1-23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Knipping, C. & Reid, D. (2005). Schwarze Kisten - Mit Black boxes Zusammenhänge erkunden. In B. Barzel, S. Hußmann, & T. Leuders (Eds.), Computer, Internet & Co. im Mathematikunterricht (pp. 167-180). Berlin: Cornelsen. Mason, J. (2002). Generalisation and algebra: Exploiting children’s powers. In L. Haggerty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice (pp. 105-120). London: RoutledgeFalmer. Morrison, T. J. (2001). Functional analysis: An introduction to Banach space theory. New York: Wiley. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Reid, D. A. (2001). Conjectures and refutations in Grade 5 Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1) 5-29. Reid, D. A. (2003). Forms and uses of abduction. In M. A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the CERME 3 international conference (n.p.). Bellaria, Italy. Published online at http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME3/Groups/TG4/TG4_Reid_cerme3.pdf Smith, E. P. & Henderson, K. B. (1959). Proof. In Fawcett H., Hach A., Junge C., Syer H., van Engen H., Jones P (Eds.), The growth of mathematical ideas K-12. Twenty-fourth yearbook (pp.111-181). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Yevdokimov, O. (2003). Intuitive proofs as a tool for development of student’s creative abilities while solving and proving. Short Oral presentation. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Doherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 264). Honolulu, USA. Yevdokimov, O. (2005). About a constructivist approach for stimulating students’ thinking to produce conjectures and their proving in active learning of geometry. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the CERME 4 International Conference (pp. 469-480). Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. Published online at http://ermeweb.free.fr/CERME4