Cultura de racionalidad y procesos de enculturación en la escuela secundaria

Referencias

Atiyah, M. et al. (1994). Responses to "Theoretical Mathematics": Towards a Cultural Synthesis of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 178-207. Berteley, M. (2000). Conociendo nuestras escuelas. México D. F.: Paidós. Boero, P. (2006). Habermas’ theory of rationality as a comprehensive frame for conjecturing and proving in school. En J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká y N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 185- 192). Praga, República Checa: PME. Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F. y Pedemonte, B. (2010). Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation. En M. F. Pinto y T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 179-209). Belo Horizonte, Brasil: PME. Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-18). California: Sage. Herbst, P. y Chazan, D. (2003). Exploring the practical rationality of Mathematics teaching through conversations about videotaped episodes: the case of engaging students in proving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(1), 2-14. Herbst, P. y Chazan, D. (2011). Research on practical rationality: Studying the justification of actions in Mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 405-462. Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 24, 389-399. Krummheuer G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. En P. Cobb y H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Martinez, M. V. y Pedemonte, B. (2014). Relationship between inductive arithmetic argumentation and deductive algebraic proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 125–149. Morselli, F. y Boero, P. (2009). Proving as a rational behaviour: Habermas' construct of rationality as a comprehensive frame for research on the teaching and learning of proof. En V. Durand, S. Soury y F. Arzaello (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 6) (pp. 211-220). Lyon, Francia: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique. Rigo, M. (2013a). Epistemic schemes and epistemic states. A study of mathematics convincement in elementary school classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics 84(1), 71-91. Rigo, M. (2013b). La convicción, la comprensión y las prácticas de racionalidad en la primaria. Estudio del profesor. En A. Berciano, G. Gutiérrez, A. Estepa y N. Climent (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XVII (pp. 459-466). Bilbao: SEIEM. Stake, R. E. (1999). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Ediciones Morata. Thom, R. (1980). “¿Son las matemáticas “modernas” un error pedagógico y filosófico?”. En J. Piaget, G. Choquet, J. Diedonné, R. Thorn y otros (Eds.), La enseñanza de las matemáticas modernas. Selección y Prólogo de Hernández, J. (pp. 115-130). Madrid: Alianza Editorial, S. A. Toulmin, S. E. (1974). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. Vergnaud, G. (1989). Multiplicative structures. En J. Hiebert y Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol. 2, pp. 141-161). Reston: NCTM. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440.