Enseñanza del álgebra: reflexiones para la observación de clase

Referencias

AI@CC Research Group. (2017). Evaluating the Quality of Instruction in Postsecondary Mathematics. Instrument for video coding. Glendale Community College, Scottsdale Community College, University of Michigan, University of Minnesota. Phoenix, AZ; Scottsdale, AZ; Ann Arbor, MI; Minneapolis, MN. § Ball, D. L., Thames, Mark, & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. § Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142. § Hill, H. C. (2011). Mathematical Quality of Instruction (MQI) Plus. Retrieved from Harvard, MA: § Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400. § Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical Knolwedge for Teaching and the Mathematical Quality of Instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511. § Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406. § Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. § Litke, E. G. (2015). The state of the gate: A description of instructional practice in algebra in five urban districts, (PhD). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. § Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X10393501 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. § National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. § National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: Author. § National Governors Association. (2010). Common core state standards. Light, J, 19, 19. § Silver, E. A., & Lane, S. (1993). Assessment in the context of mathematics instruction reform: The design of assessment in the QUASAR project. In M. Niss (Ed.), Cases of assessment in mathematics education (pp. 59-69). Dordrecth, The Netherlands: Kluwer. § Silver, E. A., Smith, M. S., & Nelson, B. S. (1995). The QUASAR project: Equity concerns meeting mathematics education reform in the middle school. In W. Secada, E. Fenemma, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 9-56). New York: Cambridge University Press. § Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (1996). The QUASAR project: The "revolution of the possible" in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30, 476-521. § Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 404-411.