Tasks and activities to enhance technological Pedagogical Mathematical Content Knowledge of teachers

Referencias

Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives in mathematics education: Papers submitted by members of the Bacomet group (pp. 243-307). Dordrecht: Reidel. Euclid. (300 BCE/2002). Euclids elements (T. L. Heath, Trans.). Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion. Gattegno, C. (1987). The science of education: Part 1: Theoretical considerations. New York: Educational Solutions. Grisi-Dicker, L., Powell, A. B., Silverman, J., & Fetter, A. (2012). Addressing transitional challenges to teaching with dynamic geometry in a collaborative online environment. In L. R. Van Zoest, J.-J. Lo & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1024- 1027). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University. Hegedus, S. J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2010). Accommodating the instrumental genesis framework within dynamic technological environments. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), 26-31. Hewitt, D. (1999). Arbitrary and necessary: Part 1 A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 2-9. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393-425. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. Margolinas, C. (2013). Tasks design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22. Oxford, UK. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Powell, A. B., Borge, I. C., Floriti, G. I., Kondratieva, M., Koublanova, E., & Sukthankar, N. (2009). Challenging tasks and mathematics learning. In E. J. Barbeau & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom: The 16th ICMI study (pp. 133-170). New York: Springer. Powell, A. B., Grisi-Dicker, L., & Alqahtani, M. (2013). Letramento matemático: Desenvolvendo as práticas colaborativas, matemáticas, e discursivas com tecnologia [Mathematical literacy: Development of collaborative, mathematical and discusive practices with technology] XI Encontro Nacional de Educação Matemática, Educação Matemática: Retrospectivas e Perspectivas [XI National Conference of Mathematics Education, Mathematics Education: Retrospectives and Perspectives. Curitiba, Paraná. Rabardel, P., & Beguin, P. (2005). Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 429-461. Ray, M. (2013). Noticing and wondering Powerful problem solving: Activities for sense making with the mathematical practices (pp. 42-55): Heinemann. Sierpinska, A. (2004). Research in mathematics education through a keyhole: Task problematization. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 7-15. Stahl, G. (2008). Social practices of group cognition in virtual math teams. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning in social practices: ICT and new artifacts—transformation of social and cultural practices: Pergamon. Stahl, G. (2013). Translating Euclid: Designing a human-centered mathematics. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer.