¿Es el conocimiento matemático del profesorado específico de su profesión? Discusión de la práctica de una maestra

Referencias

Ball, D. (1991), “Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation”, en J. Brophy (ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, vol. 2, pp. 1-48. ———————— (2000), “Bridging practices. Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach”, Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 51, núm. 3, pp. 241-247. ———————— (2002), “Knowing mathematics for teaching: Relations between research and practice”, Mathematics and Education Reform Newsletter, vol. 14, núm. 3, pp. 1-5. ———————— (2003), What Mathematical Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics, ponencia presentada en el U.S. Department of Education, Secretary’s Mathematics Summit, Washington, 6 de febrero de 2003 (http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dball/presentations/index.html, consultado el 10 de mayo de 2008). Ball, D. y H. Bass (2003), “Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching”, en B. Davis y E. Simmt (eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, Edmonton, AB, CMESG/GCEDM, pp. 3-14. Ball, D., H. Hill y H. Bass (2005), “Knowing mathematics for teaching. Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?”, American Educator, otoño, pp. 14-46. Ball, D., M. H. Thames y G. Phelps (2008), “Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special?”, Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 59, núm. 5, pp. 389-407. Brophy, J. (2004), Using Video in Teacher Education, Amsterdam, Elsevier. Climent, N. (2002), El desarrollo profesional del maestro de primaria respecto de la enseñanza de la matemática. Un estudio de caso, publicado en 2005, Michigan, Proquest Michigan University, www.proquest.co.uk. Hill, H., B. Rowan y D. L. Ball (2005), “Effects of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching on student achievement”, American Education Research Journal, vol. 42, núm. 2, pp. 371-406. Park, S. y J. S. Oliver (2008), “Revisiting the conceptualization of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals”, Research in Sciences Education, núm. 38, pp. 261-284. Ribeiro, C. M., J. Carrillo y R. Monteiro (2008), Uma perspectiva cognitiva para a análisis de uma aula de matemática no 1o Ciclo: Um exemplo de presentação de contenido tendo como recurso o desenho no quadro, comunicación oral presentada en el XIX Seminário de Investigação em Educação Matemática, XVIII Encontro de Investigação em Educação Matemática e XII Simposio de la Sociedad Española de Investigación en Educación Matemática, realizado en Badajoz, España, del 4 al 6 de septiembre de 2008. ———————— (2009), “We teach what we know, but do we know what we teach? The practical ‘distinction’ between squares and rectangles in a primary school class”, en J. Novotná y H. Moraová (eds.), International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching (SEMT 09), Praga, República Checa, Facultad de Educación-Charles University, pp. 204-212. Ribeiro, C. M., R. Monteiro y J. Carrillo (2009), Professional Knowledge in an Improvisation Episode: The Importance of a Cognitive Model, ponencia presentada en el CERME6, Lyon, Francia. Rowland, T. y F. Turner (2008), “How shall we talk about ‘subject knowledge’ for mathematics teaching?”, en M. Joubert (ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, June 2008. British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, Londres, British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, vol. 28, núm. 2, pp. 91-96. Shulman, L. (1986), “Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching”, Educational Researcher, vol. 15, núm. 2, pp. 4-14.