Experiences of problem solving in whole class interactions

Referencias

Chan, M. C. E., & Clarke, D. (2017). Structured affordances in the use of open-ended tasks to facilitate collaborative problem solving. ZDM, 49(6), 951-963. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11858-017-0876-2 Cockroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools. London. Retrieved September 2019 from http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/cockcroft/cockcroft1982.html Coles, A. (2013). On metacognition. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(1), 21-26. Conner, A. M., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532- 8 Cramer, J. C., & Knipping, C. (2018). Participation in argumentation. In U. Gellert, C. Knipping, & H. Straehler-Pohl (Eds.), Inside the mathematics class. Sociological perspectives on participation, inclusion, and enhancement (pp. 229-244). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_11 Eckert, A., & Nilsson, P. (2017). Introducing a symbolic interactionist approach on teaching mathematics: The case of revoicing as an interactional strategy in the teaching of probability. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9313-z English Department for Education (2013). Mathematics programmes of study : key stage 3 national curriculum in England, (September), 2-9. Retrieved September 2019 from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239 058/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf Erath, K. (2017). Implicit and explicit processes of establishing explaining practices - Ambivalent learning opportunities in classroom discourse. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Congress of Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1260-1267). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education & ERME. Erath, K., Prediger, S., Quasthoff, U., & Heller, V. (2018). Discourse competence as important part of academic language proficiency in mathematics classrooms: the case of explaining to learn and learning to explain. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(2), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9830-7 Felmer, P., Pehkonen, E., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (2016). Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_20 Goizueta, M. (2019). Epistemic issues in classroom mathematical activity: There is more to students’ conversations than meets the teacher’s ear. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.007 Goizueta, M., & Planas, N. (2013). Temas emergentes del análisis de interpretaciones del profesorado sobre la argumentación en clase de matemáticas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 31(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ec/v31n1.835 Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and difficult mathematical problems: Changing teachers’ views by employing multiple-solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012- 9210-7 Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Drake, C., & Cirillo, M. (2009). “Muddying the clear waters”: Teachers’ take-up of the linguistic idea of revoicing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.004 Hodgen, J., Foster, C., & Kuchemann, D. (2017). Improving mathematics in key stages two and three. Retrieved September 2019 from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publications/Campaigns/Maths/KS2_KS3_Maths_G uidance_2017.pdf Ingram, J. (2018). Moving forward with ethnomethodological approaches to analysing mathematics classroom interactions. ZDM, 50(6), 1065-1075. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11858-018-0951-3 Ingram, J., Andrews, N., & Pitt, A. (2019). When students offer explanations without the teacher explicitly asking them to. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9873-9 Kaur, B., & Toh, T. L. (2011). Mathematical problem solving: Linking theory and practice. In O. Zaslavsky & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics (pp. 177-188). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-0-387-09812-8 Kim, M., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Dialogical argumentation in elementary science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 1061-1085. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11422-017-9846-9 Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom. Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.02.001 Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(6), 1204-1230. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003 Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mason, J. (2016). When is a problem...? “when” is actually the problem! In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives (pp. 263-285). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3 Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd Ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson. https://doi.org/10.12968/eyed.2013.15.2.18 O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318-335. Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense-making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan. Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester, England: Wiley- Blackwell. Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2-3), 161-217. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675 Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455 Thompson, P. W. (1985). Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: Considerations in developing mathematics curricula. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 189-243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Whitenack, J. W., & Knipping, N. (2002). Argumentation, instructional design theory and students’ mathematical learning: A case for coordinating interpretive lenses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732- 3123(02)00144-X Wood, T. (1988). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Cultural perspectives on the mathematics classroom (pp. 149- 168). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00143-8 Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.