Los procesos de validación en geometría en situaciones de conflicto

Referencias

Alibert, D., & Thomas, M. (1991). Research on mathematical proof. En D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 215-230). The Netherlands: Kluwer. Balacheff, N. (2000). Procesos de prueba en alumnos de matemáticas. Bogotá: Una Empresa Docente. Bell, A. (1976). A study of pupils’ proof- explanations in mathematics situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 23-40. Chazan, D. (1993), High School Geometry Students’ Justification for their Views of Empirical Evidence and Mathematical Proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24 (4), 359-387. Duval, R. (2007). Cognitive functioning and the understanding of mathematical processes of proof. En P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 137-162). Rotterdam: Sense publishers. Fischbein, E., & Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and Certitude in the Development of Mathematical Thinking. En A. Vermandel (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 128-31). Antwerp, Belgium. Hadas, N., & Hershkowitz, R. (1999). The role of uncertainty in constructing and proving in computerized environment. Proceedings of the 23th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 3-57). Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2000). The role of contradiction and uncertainty in promoting the need to prove in dynamic geometry environments. Educational studies in Mathematics, 44(1-2), 127-150. Hadas, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2002). Analyses of activity design in geometry in the light of student actions. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 2(4), 529-552. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2, 805842. Marrades, R., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational studies in mathematics, 44(1-2), 87-125. Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23-41. Perraudeau, M. (1999). Piaget Hoy. Respuestas a una controversia. Mexico: Fondo de cultura económica. Prusak, N., Hershkowitz R. & Schwarz. (2011). From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design, Educational Studies in Mathematics, published on line 23 de junio de 2011. Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2008). “Cognitive conflict” as a mechanism for supporting developmental progressions in students’ knowledge about proof. Artículo disponible en la página web Del 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education, under Topic Study Group 18 (http://tsg.icme11.org/tsg/show/19). Monterrey, México. Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314-352. Vinner, S. (1983). The notion of proof–some aspects of students’ views at the senior high level. En Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 289-294). Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297-321. Zazkis, R., & Chernoff, E. J. (2008). What makes a counterexample exemplary? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 195-208.