Perspectivas matemáticas y pedagógicas de la justificación: Aproximando la raíz de 18

Referencias

Borasi, R.(1996). Reconceiving Mathematics Instruction: a Focus on Errors. Norwood, NJ: Praeger. Chazan, D.,& Herbst, P. (2012). Animations of classroom interaction: expanding the boundaries of video records of practice. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1-34. Freeman, J. B. (2005). Systematizing Toulmin’s warrants: an epistemic approach. Argumentation,19(3),331-346. Markovits, Z., Eylon, B., & Bruckheimer, M. (1983). Functions: linearity unconstrained. InR.Hershkowitz(Ed.),Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (p.271-277). Israel: Rehovot. Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Zachariades, T.(2012). ‘Warrant’ revisited: integrating mathematics teachers’ pedagogical and epistemological considerations into Toulmin’s model for argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 157-173. Sfard, A.(2008). Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Toulmin,S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K.G. Tobin(Ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education(p.2338). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.