Taxonomy of key terms for mathematics education
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Castro, Paola y Gómez, Pedro
Resumen
We present the process of developing a taxonomy of key terms for Mathematics Education. We build on the existing taxonomy of key terms that has been used in an open access document repository. Additionally, we took into account terms that have been established in encyclopedias of the discipline and the frequency of use of keywords in specialized journals that were indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. We made a review of synonymy between these terms and the terms of the existing taxonomy. We included in our proposal the terms that are relevant given their frequency of use in the journals. We removed from the existing taxonomy the terms that are little used in practice. The new taxonomy is organized in six main categories: approach, educational level, foundations of Mathematics Education, research in Mathematics Education, pedagogical notions and mathematical content. This proposal was validated in three phases by researchers, innovators in Mathematics Education, and editors of specialized journals and experts who lead associations and events in the discipline.
Fecha
2021
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
9
Número
4
Rango páginas (artículo)
585-613
ISSN
2147611X
Referencias
Aadland, T., & Aaboen, L. (2020). An entrepreneurship education taxonomy based on authenticity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-18. doi:10.1080/03043797.2020.1732305 Adamuz-Povedano, N., Jiménez-Fanjul, N., & Maz-Machado, A. (2013). Búsqueda de descriptores que caractericen una disciplina emergente en WoS y SCOPUS: el caso de la Educación Matemática. [Search for descriptors that characterize an emerging discipline in WoS and SCOPUS: the case of mathematics education]. Biblios, 50, 1-14. doi:10.5195/biblios.2013.80 Bracho, R., Jiménez-Fanjul, N., Maz-Machado, A., Torralbo-Rodríguez, M., & Fernández-Cano, A. (2014). Producción científica sobre narrativa en Educación Matemática en la Web of Science. [Scientific Production about Narrative in Mathematics Education field in the Web of Science]. Boletim de Educação Matemática, 28(49). doi:10.1590/1980-4415v28n49a14 Castro, P., & Gómez, P. (2021). Educación Matemática en países hispanohablantes: evolución de su documentación de acceso abierto. [Mathematics Education in Spanish-Speaking Countries: Evolution of its Open Access Documentation]. PNA. Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática, 15(2). doi:10.30827/pna.v15i2.16155 Cruz-Ramírez, M. (2018). Exploración de la producción científica mundial en matemática educativa. Una mirada cienciométrica. [Exploring the world scientific production in mathematics education. A scientometric look]. Transformación, 14(2), 150-161. Cruz-Ramirez, M., & Rodriguez-Devesa, R. (2019). A scientometric look at mathematics education from Scopus database. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), 37-46. Engel, W., Pryde, C., & Sappington, P. (2010). Method and system for enhanced taxonomy generation. Google Patents. United States. ERIC. (2017). Mathematics education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?qt=mathematics+education&ti=Mathematics+Education Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: A bibliometric mapping and visualization. Educational Research Review, 27, 28-55. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.002 FIZ Karlsruhe. (2010). MathEduc Database. Retrieved from http://www.zentralblatt- math.org/matheduc/classification/ FIZ Karlsruhe. (2019). ZDM Subject Classification Scheme. http://www.imvibl.org/dmbl/novosti/zdm_didactical_mathematics_mlassification.pdf Retrieved from Gökçe, S., & Guner, P. (2021). Forty years of mathematics education: 1980-2019. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 9(3), 514-539. doi:10.46328/ijemst.1361 Gómez, P., & Cañadas, M. C. (2013). Development of a taxonomy for key terms in mathematics education and its use in a digital repository. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/903/ Grinstein, L. S., & Lipsey, S. I. (2001). Encyclopedia of mathematics education.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Irfan, R., Khan, S., Abbas, M. A., & Shah, A. A. (2019). Determining Influential Factors and Challenges in Automatic Taxonomy Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Techniques 1999-2016. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 24(2), 25. Jiménez, N., Adamuz, N., Maz, A., Bracho, R., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2011). Producción científica internacional en Educación Matemática en SSCI y SCOPUS (1980-2009): Construcción de descriptores. [International scientific production in Mathematics Education in SSCI and SCOPUS (1980-2009): Construction of descriptors]. In J. L. Lupiánez, M. C. Cañadas, M. Molina, M. Palarea, & A. Maz (Eds.), Investigaciones en Pensamiento Numérico y Algebraico e Historia de la Matemática y Educación Matemática - 2011 (pp. 325-335). Granada: Dpto. Didáctica de la Matemática, Universidad de Granada. Klassen, M., & Donald, J. (2020). Developing a Taxonomy to Compare Engineering Leadership Curricula Across Canadian Universities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education(20), 130-145. doi:10.1007/s42330-019-00072-8 Lerman, S. (Ed.) (2014). Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (1 ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. Lerman, S. (Ed.) (2020). Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (2 ed.). Dordrecht: Springer. Long, C., & Dunne, T. (2014). Mathematics, curriculum and assessment: The role of taxonomies in the quest for coherence. pythagoras, 35(2), 1-14. doi:10.4102/ pythagoras.v35i2.240 Mullis, I., Martin, M., Ruddock, G., O‘Sullivan, C., Arora, A., & Eberber, E. (2005). TIMSS 2007 Assessment Frameworks.). Chestnut Hill, Estados Unidos: Boston College. National Information Standards Organization. (2005). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies.). Bethesda, MD: NISO Press. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial literacy.). Paris, France: PISA, OECD Publishing. Paukkeri, M.-S., García-Plaza, A. P., Fresno, V., Unanue, R. M., & Honkela, T. (2012). Learning a taxonomy from a set of text documents. Applied Soft Computing, 12(3), 1138-1148. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.11.009 Pertegal-Vega, M. Á., Oliva-Delgado, A., & Rodríguez-Meirinhos, A. (2019). Systematic review of the current state of research on Online Social Networks: Taxonomy on experience of use. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal(60), 81-90. doi:10.3916/C60-2019-08 Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Bloom‘s taxonomy and major theories and frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics: a comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 895-920. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2018.1549336 Rico, L. (1997). Bases teóricas del currículo de matemáticas en educación secundaria. [Theoretical bases of the mathematics curriculum in secondary education]. Madrid: Síntesis. Sujatha, R., Bandaru, R., & Rao, R. (2011). Taxonomy construction techniques–issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 2(5), 661-671. Tatto, T., Schwille, J., Schmidt, W., Ingvarson, L., & Beavis, A. (2006). IEA teacher education study in mathematics (TEDS-M). Conceptual framework.). East Lansing, Estados Unidos: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University. UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO Thesaurus. Retrieved from http://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus Young, J., & Young, J. (2022). Equity trends in mathematics education: A content analysis of meta-analytic research. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 4(1), 24-42. doi:10.46328/ijonse.57