The mathematics that secondary teachers (need to) know
Tipo de documento
Autores
Aguilar, Manuel | Aragón, Estíbaliz | Araujo, Antonio | Navarro, José
Lista de autores
Aragón, Estíbaliz, Aguilar, Manuel, Navarro, José y Araujo, Antonio
Resumen
In spite of decades of focused research, the phenomenon of «teachers’ disciplinary knowledge of mathematics» is not yet a well-formulated construct. This lack of deep understanding is troublesome, as uncritical assumptions about and entrenched practices around the mathematics that teachers should know can have major implications for teacher preparation programs, especially at the secondary level.
Fecha
2015
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Educación media, bachillerato, secundaria superior (16 a 18 años) | Educación secundaria básica (12 a 16 años)
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Referencias
BALL, D. L., HILL, H. C. & BASS, H. (2005) Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, Fall, pp. 14-46. BALL, D. L., THAMES, M. H., & PHELPS, G. (2008) Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Educa- tion, 59:5, pp. 389-407. BAUMERT, J., KUNTER, M., BLUM, W., BRUNNER, M., VOSS, T., JORDAN, A., KLUS- MANN, U., KRAUSS, S., NEUBRAND M. & TSAI, Y. (2010) Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the class- room, and student progress, American Educa- tional Research Journal, 47, pp. 33-180. BEGLE, E. G. (1972) SMSG Reports No. 9, Teacher knowledge and student achieve- ment in algebra (Palo Alto CA, Stanford University). BEGLE, E. G. (1979) Critical variables in mathe- matics education: findings from a survey of the empirical literature (Washington DC, Mathematical Association of American and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). BRUNER, J. (1966) Toward a theory of instruction (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press). DAVIS, B. (2011) Mathematics teachers’ subtle, complex disciplinary knowledge, Science, 332, pp. 1506-1507. DAVIS, B. (2014) Toward a more power-full school mathematics, For the Learning of Mathema- tics, 34:1, pp. 12-18. DAVIS, B., & RENERT, M. (2014) The math teachers know: profound understanding of emer gent mathematics (New York, Routledge). DEPAEPE, F., VERSCHAFFEL, L. & KELCH TERMANS, G. (2013) Pedagogical content knowledge: a systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, pp. 12-25. ENGLISH, L. (Ed.) (1997) Mathematical reasoning: analogies, metaphors, and images (Hills- dale NJ, Erlbaum). ERICSSON, K. A., CHARNESS, N., FELTOVICH, P. & HOFFMAN, R. R., (2006) Cambridge handbook on expertise and expert performance (Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press). FAUCONNIER, G. & TURNER, M. (2002) The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities (New York, Basic Books). FREUDENTHAL, H. (1983) Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures (Dordrecht NL, D. Reidel). GOLDIN, G. A. & JANVIER, C. (Eds.) (1998) Re- presentations and the psychology of mathema- tics education, Parts I and II (special issues), Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17: 1&2. HIEBERT, J., GALLIMORE, R., GARNIER, H., BOGARD GIVVIN, K., HOLLINGSWORTH, H., JACOBS, J., MIUYING CHUI, A., WEAR- NE, D., SMITH, M., KERSTING, N., MANASTER, A., TSENG, E., ETTERBEEK, W., MANASTER, E., GONZALES, P. & STIGLER, J. W. (2003) Teaching mathematics in seven countries: the results of the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (Washington DC, National Center for Education Statistics. Department of Education). HILL, H., BALL, D. L. & SCHILLING, S. (2008) Unpacking «pedagogical content knowledge»: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ to-pic-specific knowledge of students, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39:4, pp. 372-400. HOFSTADTER, D. & SANDER, E. (2013) Surfaces and essences: analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking (New York, Basic Books). JANVIER, C. (Ed.) (1987) Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (Hillsdale NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). KAISER, G., BLÖMEKE, S., BUSSE, A., DÖHR-MANN, M. & KÖNIG, J. (2014) Professional knowledge of (prospective) mathematics tea-ching—its structure and development, in LILJEDAHL, P., NICOL, C., OESTERLE, S. & ALLAN, D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1, pp. 35-50. LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought (New York, Basic Books). LAKOFF, G. & NÚÑEZ, R. (2000) Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being (New York, Ba- sic Books). MA, L. (1999) Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fun- damental mathematics in China and the Uni- ted States (Mahwah NJ, Erlbaum). ROWLAND, T. & RUTHVEN, K. (Eds.) (2011) Mathematical knowledge in teaching (Dordre-cht, Springer). SFARD, A. (2008) Thinking as communicating: human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing (New York, Cambridge University Press). SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15:2, 4-14. TATTO, M. T. (Ed.) (2013) The Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Technical report (Amsterdam, IEA).