La ausencia de una adecuada relación entre el conocimiento disciplinar y el pedagógico en programas de formación de profesores de matemáticas

Referencias

Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (2008). The power of Colombian mathematics teachers’ conceptions of social/institutional factors of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 37-54. Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (2007). La creciente brecha entre las disposiciones educativas colombianas, las proclamaciones oficiales y las realidades del aula de clase: Las concepciones de profesores y profesoras de matemáticas sobre el álgebra escolar y el propósito de su enseñanza, Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 5(1), 43-62. Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (2005). Explicaciones de ciertas actitudes hacia el cambio:las concepciones de profesores y profesoras de matemáticas colombianos(as) sobre los factores determinantes de su práctica de enseñanza del álgebra escolar, Revista EMA, 10(2)- 10(3), 375-412. Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (2004). Explanations of Attitudes to Change: Colombian Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of their Own Teaching Practices of Beginning Algebra. Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. (Ver http://arrow.monash.edu.au) Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (2002). Promoción del pensamiento algebraico en la escuela primaria: una propuesta que cobra sentido de acuerdo con nuestras concepciones sobre el conocimiento matemático. Aula Urbana. N.° 37. Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (2000). Una innovación curricular que enfoca el proceso de transición entre el trabajo aritmético y el algebraico. Tunja: Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia. Agudelo-Valderrama, C. (1996). Improving mathematics education in Colombian schools: “Mathematics for all’. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(1), 15-26. Agudelo-Valderrama, C., Clarke, B. & Bishop, A. (2007). Explanations of attitudes to change: Colombian mathematics teachers´ conceptions of the crucial determinants of their teaching practices of beginning algebra. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 69-93. Agudelo-Valderrama, C., & Vergel, R. (2009). Informe final del Proyecto PROMICE. Promoción de un enfoque interdisciplinario y de resolución de problemas en el inicio del trabajo algebraico escolar: integrando contextos de ciencias y el uso de tecnología digital. Bogotá: Centro de documentación, Instituto para la Investigación Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico, IDEP, Secretaría de Educación Distrital. Amato, S. (2004). Improving student teachers’ attitudes to mathematics. In M. J. HØines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th PME International Conference, 2, 25–32. Ball, D. Lubienski, S. & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. En V. Richardson(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 433-456). N. Y.: McMillan. Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Ball, D., Bass, H., Sleep. L., & Thames, M. (2005). A theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study: The Education and Professional Development of Teachers of Mathematics. Águas de Lindóia. Brazil. Beckmann, C. E., Wells, P. J., Gabrosek, J., Billings, E. H., Aboufadel, E. F., Curtiss, P., Dickinson, W., Austin, D., & Champion, A. (2004). Enhancing the mathematical understanding of prospective teachers: Using standards-based, grades K-12 activities. In R. R. Rubenstein & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of mathematics (pp. 151–163). Reston, VA: NCTM. Bishop, A. J. (2005). Aproximación sociocultural a la educación matemática. Cali: Universidad del Valle. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Cooney, T. J. & Wiegel, H. G. (2003). Examining the mathematics in mathematics teacher education. En A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick y F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 795-828). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Davis, B., Simmt, E., & Sumara D. (2005). Mathematics for-teaching: an ongoing investigation of the mathematics teacher (need to) know). Paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study: The Education and Professional Development of Teachers of Mathematics. Águas de Lindóia. Brazil. Dewey, J. (1964). John Dewey on Education (R. Archambault, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original publicado en 1904). Díaz, C., Solarte, E., & Arce, J. (1997). Colombia. En D. F. Robitaille (Ed.), National contexts for mathematics and science education. An encyclopaedia of the education systems participating in TIMSS (pp. 82-90). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press. Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, Beliefs and Attitudes of the Mathematics Teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3–56. Firer, M. (2005). Writing ddactical activities as a formative element for mathematics teachers. Paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study: The Education and Professional Development of Teachers of Mathematics. Águas de Lindóia. Brazil. Freudenthal H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, the Netherlands:D. reidel Publishing Company. González, M., & Pedroza, G. (1999). Reflexiones sobre aspectos claves del algebra escolar. Revista EMA - Investigación e innovación en educación matemática, 5(1), 87-91. Jaworski, B., & Gellert, U. (2003). Educating new mathematics teachers: Integrating theory and practice, and the roles of practising teachers. En A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 829–875). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Krainer, K. (2003). Teams, Communities and Networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93-105. Lampert & Ball, (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press. Liljedahl, P. (2005). Components of mathematics teacher training. En R. Even & D. Ball (Eds). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics,(pp. 25-33). The Netherlands: Springer. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. McEwan, H. and Bull, B.: 1991, ‘The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge’,American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316-334. McGowen, M. (2001). Improving the undergraduate experience of future Teachers:Challenges and Issues. MAA CRAFTY Report of the Conference on the Mathematics Preparation of Preservice Teachers. Ministerio de Educación Nacional (1998). Lineamientos Curriculares de Matemáticas. Bogotá: Magisterio. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston VA. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston VA. Perry, P., Guacaneme, E.; Andrade, L., & Fernández, F. (2003). Transformar la enseñanza de la proporcionalidad en la escuela: un hueso duro de roer. Bogotá:Una empresa docente, Universidad de los Andes. Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2008). Preservice mathematics teachers’ knowledge and development. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 223-261). New York: Routledge. Putnam, R. & Borko, H. (2000). What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. USA: Basic Books. Shulman, L.: 1986, ‘Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching’, Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Shulman, L.: 1987, ‘Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform’,Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic teacher, November, pp. 9-15. Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: the Free Press. Walter, J. & Gerson, H. (2007). Teachers’ personal agency: making sense of slope through additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(2 ), 203-233.