Significant process of change for elementary teachers to foster functional thinking

Referencias

ASGHARI, N.; SHAHVARANI, A.; MEDGHALCHI, A. R. Preparing ElementaryTeachers to Foster Functional Thinking. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Amman, Jordan, v. 5, n. 12, p. 485-489, 2011. BALL, D. L. What do students know? Facing challenges of distance, context, and desire in trying to hear children. In: BIDDLE, B.; GOOD, T.; GOODSON, I. (Ed.).International handbook of teachers and teaching. 1997. p. 679-818. Vol. II. BLANTON, M.; KAPUT, J. Developing elementary teachers’ algebra eyes and ears.Teaching Children Mathematics, Reston, Va, n. 10, p. 70-77. 2003. Blanton, M. L.; Kaput, J. J. Characterizing a Classroom Practice That Promotes Algebraic Reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, Va., US, v. 36, n. 5, p. 412-446, Nov. 2005. BLANTON, M. L.; KAPUT, J. J. Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, VA, v. 36, n. 5, p. 412-443, Jan. 2005. CARRAHER, D. W.; SCHLIMANN, A. D.; BRIZUELA, B. M. Early Algebra, EarlyArithmetic: treating operations as functions. In: NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICSEDUCATION (PME-NA), 22nd, 2000, Tucson, AZ, Proceedings… Tucson, AZ: Ohio State University, 2000, p. 1-26. Available at: . Accessed in: 18 Nov. 2013. CARRAHER, D. W.; SCHLIEMANN, A. D.; BRIZUELA, B. M.; ERNEST, D. Arithmetic and algebra in early Mathematics Education, Journal for research in Mathematics Education, Reston, Va, v. 37, n. 2, p. 87-115, 2006. CHAZAN, D. Algebra for All Students. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Norwood, NJ, v. 15, n. 4, p. 455-477, 1996. CUOCO, A. Computational media to support the learning and use of functions. In: DISESSA, A.; HOYLES, C.; NOSS, R. (Ed.). Computers and exploratory learning. Heidelberg: Springer, 1995. p. 79-108. DREYFUS, T. Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In: TALL, D. (Ed.). Advanced mathematical thinking. Dordtrecht: KluwerAcademic Publishers, 1991. p. 25-41. DUBINSKY, E.; HAREL, G. The nature of the process conception of function. In: DUBINSKY, E.; HAREL, G. (Ed.). The concept of function–aspects of epistemology and pedagogy. Washington, US: Mathematical Assn of Amer, 1992. p. 85-106. GUSKEY, T. R. Implementing Mastery Learning, 2. ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997. GUSKEY, T. R. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2000. HALL, G.; HORD, S. Implementing Change: patterns, principles and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001. HALL, G.; LOUCKS, S. Teacher concerns as a basis for facilitating and personalizing staff development. Teachers College Record, New York, v. 80, n. 1, p. 36-53, 1978. HALL, G.; LOUCKS, S.; RUTHERFORD, W.; NEWLOVE, B. Levels of use of theinnovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, Washington, US, v. 26, n. 1, p. 52-56, 1975. Doi: 10.1177/ 00224871502600114.1975. HEIDEMAN, C. Introduction to staff development. In: BURKE, P. et al. (Ed.).Programming for staff development. London: Falmer Press, 1990, p. 3-9. HILL, H.; BALL, D. Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, Va., US, v. 35, n. 5, p. 330-351, 2004. JACOBS, V. R.; FRANKE, M. L.; CARPENTER, T. P.; LEVI, L.; BATTEY, D.Professional Development Focused on Children’s Algebraic Reasoning in Elementary School. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Reston, Va., US, v. 38, n. 3, p. 258-288, 2007. KAJANDER, A.; KEENE, A. J.; SIDDO, R.; ZERPA, C. Effects of Professional Development on Intermediate Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs Related to Mathematics. 2006. Final Report of the PRISM-NWO Project – Lakehead University, Ontario Ministry of Education, 2006. KAPUT, J. J.; CARRAHER, D. W.; BLANTON, M. L. Algebra in the Early Grades. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 2008. KIERAN, C. The learning and teaching of school algebra. In: GROUWS, D. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992. p.390-419. KIERAN, C. Algebraic Thinking in the Elementary Grades: What Is It? The Mathematics Educator, Athens, GA, v. 8, n. 1, p. 139-151, 2004. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM). Principles andstandards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, 2000. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM) and MATHEMATICS SCIENCES EDUCATION BOARD (MSEB). (Ed.). The nature androle of algebra in the K-14 curriculum. 1998. Proceedings of a national symposium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. SMITH, E. Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In: KAPUT, J. J. (Ed.). Algebra in the Early Grades. New York: Routledge Publishers, 2008. p. 133-160. TUNKS, J.; WELLER. K. Changing practice, changing minds, from arithmetical to algebraic thinking: an application of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM), Educational Studies in Mathematics, Dordrecht, v. 72, p. 161-183. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/ s10649-009-9189-x.2009. VILLEGAS-REIMERS, E. Teacher Professional Development: an international review of literature. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning, 2003. WARREN, E.; COOPERR, T. J. Theory and practice: developing an algebra syllabus for Years P-7. In: ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION, 12th, 2001, Melbourne. Proceedings… Melbourne: CHICK, H.; STACEY, K.; VINCENT, J.; VINCENT, J. (Ed.),2001. p. 641-648. Available at: .Accessed in: 18 Nov. 2013.