Mathematical reasoning required when students seek the original graph from a derivative graph

Referencias

Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., & Schwingendorf, K. E. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(4), 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90015-8 Aspinwall, L., Shaw, K. L., & Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Uncontrollable mental imagery: Graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002976729261 Baker, B., Cooley, L., & Trigueros, M. (2000). A Calculus Graphing Schema. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5(7), 557–578. Berry, J. S., & Nyman, M. A. (2003). Promoting students’ graphical understanding of the calculus. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmathb.2003.09.006 Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Variation , covariation , and functions : Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456) (Issue January). Cooley, L. (2002). Writing in calculus and reflective abstraction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00129-3 Cooley, L., Trigueros, M., & Baker, B. (2007). Schema Thematization: A Framework and an Example. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 370–392. David, E. J., Roh, K. H., & Sellers, M. E. (2018). Value-thinking and location-thinking: Two ways students visualize points and think about graphs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, August, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.09.004 Dominguez, H. (2019). Theorizing reciprocal noticing with non-dominant students in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10649-019-09896-5 Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. Cambridge University Press. Fuentealba, C., Badillo, E., Sánchez-Matamoros, G., & Cárcamo, A. (2019). The understanding of the derivative concept in higher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ ejmste/100640 Fuentealba, C., Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Badillo, E., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Thematization of derivative schema in university students: nuances in constructing relations between a function’s successive derivatives. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016. 1248508 García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2019). Pre-university students’ mathematical connections when sketching the graph of derivative and antiderivative functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-01900286-x García, M., Llinares, S., & Sánchez-Matamoros, G. (2011). Characterizing thematized derivative schema by the underlying emergent structures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763010-9227-2 Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity, and Flexibility: A “Proceptual” View of Simple Arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.2307/749505 Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (2012). Duality , Ambiguity , And Flexibility : A “ Proceptual “ View Of Simple Arithmetic. 25(2), 116–140. Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2016). Object-spatial visualization and verbal cognitive styles, and their relation to cognitive abilities and mathematical performance. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(3), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0429 Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. (2009). The role of reversibility in the learning of the calculus derivative and antiderivative graphs. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5, 5, 81–88. Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. C. (2010). Contrasting cases of calculus students’ understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903480300 Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.511 565 Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0196 Hong, Y. Y., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2015). Graphical construction of a local perspective on differentiation and integration. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0135-6 Ikram, M., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020). Relationship between reversible reasoning and conceptual knowledge in composition of function. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032004 Ikram, Muhammad, Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020). Exploring the potential role of reversible reasoning: Cognitive research on inverse function problems in mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665836 Martin, L. C., & Towers, J. (2016). Folding back , thickening and mathematical metbefores. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmathb.2016.07.002 Mcgowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2013). Flexible thinking and met-befores : Impact on learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 527–537. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.06.004 Montenegro, P., Costa, C., & Lopes, B. (2018). Transformations in the Visual Representation of a Figural Pattern. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1441599 Moore, K. C., Paoletti, T., & Musgrave, S. (2013). Covariational reasoning and invariance among coordinate systems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 461–473. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.05.002 Natsheh, I., & Karsenty, R. (2014). Exploring the potential role of visual reasoning tasks among inexperienced solvers. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0551-1 Ramful, A. (2014). Reversible reasoning in fractional situations: Theorems-in-action and constraints. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmathb.2013.11.002 Ryberg, U. (2018). Generating different lesson designs and analyzing their e ff ects : The impact of representations when discerning aspects of the derivative. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51(March), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.012 Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of Sstudens’ understanding of the derivate concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-0149544-y Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2019). Relationships among prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ skills of attending, interpreting and responding to students’ understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9855-y Sangwin, C. J., & Jones, I. (2017). Asymmetry in student achievement on multiple-choice and constructed-response items in reversible mathematics processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9725-4 Simon, M. A., Kara, M., Placa, N., & Sandir, H. (2016). Categorizing and promoting reversibility of mathematical concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9697-4 Sofronas, K. S., DeFranco, T. C., Vinsonhaler, C., Gorgievski, N., Schroeder, L., & Hamelin, C. (2011). What does it mean for a student to understand the first-year calculus? Perspectives of 24 experts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 131–148. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.02.001 Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (2009). Children’s fractional knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media. Tall, D. O. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217474 Tall, D. O. (2009). Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0192-6 Thomas, M. O. J., & Stewart, S. (2011). Eigenvalues and eigenvectors: Embodied, symbolic and formal thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0016-1 Törner, G., Potari, D., & Zachariades, T. (2014). Calculus in European classrooms: curriculum and teaching in different educational and cultural contexts. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858014-0612-0 Ubuz, B. (2007). Interpreting a graph and constructing its derivative graph: Stability and change in students’ conceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 609–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701359313 Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE publication. Zandieh, M. J., & Knapp, J. (2006). Exploring the role of metonymy in mathematical understanding and reasoning : The concept of derivative as an example. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.11.002