Investigating mathematical cognition using distinctive features of mathematical discourse

Referencias

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000, Summer). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Texas Educational Review. Ben-Yehuda, M., Lavy, I., Linchevski, L., & Sfard, A. (2005). Doing wrong with words: What bars students' access to arithmetical discourses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(3), 176-247. Berger, M. (2004). The functional use of a mathematical sign. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 81-102. Campbell, J. I. D. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62. Duval, R. (2006). A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 103-131. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: MIT Press. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178-186. Fife, S. R. (2009). The relation of homework type to achievement and retention of students enrolled in intermediate algebra. University of Houston, Houston, US Gustafson, B. J., & MacDonald, D. (2004). Talk as a tool for thinking: Using Professional discourse practices to frame children's design technology talk. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 331 - 351. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Sociolinguistic aspects of mathematical education. In Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (pp. 194-204). London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd. Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning & Individual Differences, 19(2), 269-276. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 87-113. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359-377. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111. Moschkovich, J. (2003). What counts as mathematical discourse? In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint meeting of PME and PMENA (Vol. 3, pp. 325-331). Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA: University of Hawai'i. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Nührenbörger, M., & Steinbring, H. (2009). Forms of mathematical interaction in different social settings: examples from students', teachers' and teacher-students' communication about mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 111-132. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training/OMET. (2005). The Ontario curriculum Grades 1 - 8 mathematics, Revised. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pirie, S. E. B. (1998). Crossing the gulf between thought and symbol: Language as (slippery) stepping-stones. In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini Bussi & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 7-29). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Radford, L. (2004). Body, tool, and symbol: Semiotic reflections on cognition. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), In the proceedings of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 111-117). Université Laval. Sfard, A. (2000). Symbolizing mathematical reality into being - or How mathematical objects and discourse create each other. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating: Perspectives on mathematical discourse, tools and instructional design. (pp. 37-98). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum. Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students' mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42-76. Winslow, C. (1998). A linguistic approach to the justification problem in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 17-23. Wu, S. S., Meyer, M. L., Maeda, U., Salimpoor, V., Tomiyama, S., Geary, D. C., et al. (2008). Standardized assessment of strategy use and working memory in early mental arithmetic performance. Developmental Neuropyschology, 33(3), 365-393.