Teacher’s semiotic games in mathematics laboratory

Referencias

Anichini, G., Arzarello, F., Ciarrapico, L., & Robutti, O. (Eds.). (2004). New mathematical standards for the school from 5 through 18 years. Copenhagen: UMI-CIIM. Antinucci, F. (2001). La scuola si è rotta. Bari, Italy: Laterza. Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process, Relime, Numero Especial, 267-299. Arzarello, F., & Paola D. (2007). Semiotic games: The role of the teacher. In J. Woo, H. Lew, K. Park, & D. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 17–24. Seoul, Korea: The Korean Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics. Arzarello F, Robutti O., Bazzini L. (2005). Acting is learning: focus on the construction of mathematical concepts. Cambridge Journal of Education. Special Issue, Vol. 35, n.1, 55-67. Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O. & Sabena, C. (2008). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Special Issue http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9163-z Arzarello, F. & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. In: Lyn English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh e D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (LEA, USA), 2nd revised edition, 716-745. Arzarello F., Robutti O. (2003). Approaching algebra through motion experiences. In: Perceptuo-motor Activity and Imagination in Mathematics Learning, Research Forum 1, In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T . Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference. of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, pp. 111-115. Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i. Bartolini Bussi, M.G. (1998). Joint activity in mathematics classroom: A Vygoskian analysis. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom, 13-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bartolini, M.G. & Mariotti, M.A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom. In: Lyn English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh e D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (LEA, USA), 2nd revised edition, 746-783. Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G. & Voigt, J. (1988). Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies. In H. G. Steiner & A. Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and methodology of the discipline mathematics education, 174-188. Bielefled-Antwerp. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, (61), 103-131. Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 1-25. Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media, Information Design Journal, 12(2), 110-119. Lakoff, G., & Nùñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books. Malara, N. & Zan, R. (2008). The complex interplay between theory in mathematics education and teachers’ practice. Reflections and examples. In: Lyn English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh e D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (LEA, USA), 2nd revised edition, 535-560. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T . Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference. of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 103–135. Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i. Radford, L. (2006). The Anthropology of Meaning, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 39-65. Robutti O. (2003). Real and virtual calculator: from measurement to definite integral. In: Proceedings of CERME 3. http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/proceedings/Groups/TG9/TG9_Robutti_cerme3.pdf. Robutti O., Arzarello F. & Bartolini Bussi, M.G, (2004). Infinity as a multi-faceted concept in history and in the mathematics classroom. In: M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestat (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 4, 89-96. Robutti O. (2006). Motion, Technology, Gesture in Interpreting Graphs. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education. vol. 13 n.3, 117-126. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching in context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1999). Models of the teaching process. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 243-261. Sinclair, N., & Schiralli, M. (2003). A constructive response to ‘Where mathematics comes from.’ Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(1), 79–91. Sriraman, B. & English, L. (2005). Theories of mathematics education: a global survey of theoretical frameworks/trends in mathematics education research. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(6), 450-456. Tall, D. (1989). Concept Images, Generic Organizers, Computers & Curriculum Change, For the Learning of Mathematics, 9 (3) 37-42 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Williams, J. (2008). Embodied multi-modal communication from the perspective of activity theory, Educational Studies in Mathematics. Special Issue http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9164-y