Exploring students reversible reasoning when sketching an original graph involving derivatives concept

Referencias

Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. a, & Whitacre, I. (2014). Obstacles and Affordances for Integer Reasoning : An Analysis of Children ’ s Thinking and the History of Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 19–61. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0019 Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2010). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.21225/d5g01t Dubinsky, E. (2002). Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking. In: Tall, D. (eds) Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Mathematics Education Library, vol 11. (pp 95–126) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7 Fuentealba, C., Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Badillo, E., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Thematization of derivative schema in university students: nuances in constructing relations between a function’s successive derivatives. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1248508 García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2019). Pre-university students’ mathematical connections when sketching the graph of derivative and antiderivative functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00286-x García, M., Llinares, S., & Sánchez-Matamoros, G. (2011). Characterizing thematized derivative schema by the underlying emergent structures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9227-2 Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perpsective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (Issue January 2000). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602725 Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, Ambiguity, and Flexibility: A “Proceptual” View of Simple Arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.2307/749505 Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. (2009). The role of reversibility in the learning of the calculus derivative and antiderivative graphs. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 5(5), 81–88. Haciomeroglu, E. S., Aspinwall, L., & Presmeg, N. C. (2010). Contrasting cases of calculus students’ understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903480300 Haciomeroglu, E. S., Chicken, E., & Dixon, J. K. (2013). Relationships between Gender, Cognitive Ability, Preference, and Calculus Performance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(3), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.794255 Hackenberg, A. J. (2010). Students’ reasoning with reversible multiplicative relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 383–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.511565 Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2015). Relationships between students’ fractional knowledge and equation writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 196–243. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0196 Hodnik Čadež, T., & Manfreda Kolar, V. (2015). Comparison of types of generalizations and problem-solving schemas used to solve a mathematical problem. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9598-y Hong, Y. Y., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2015). Graphical construction of a local perspective on differentiation and integration. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0135-6 Ikram, M., Purwanto, Nengah Parta, I., & Susanto, H. (2020). Mathematical reasoning required when students seek the original graph from a derivative graph. Acta Scientiae, 22(6), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5933 Ikram, M., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020). Exploring the potential role of reversible reasoning: Cognitive research on inverse function problems in mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665836 Ikram, M., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020c). Relationship between reversible reasoning and conceptual knowledge in composition of function. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032004 Kang, R., & Liu, D. (2018). The Importance of Multiple Representations of Mathematical Problems: Evidence from Chinese Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Analysis of a Learning Goal. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9760-8 Kang, W. (2015). Implication from Polya and Krutetskii. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. (pp. 405–416). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6 Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children’s thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/749385 Leiss, D., Plath, J., & Schwippert, K. (2019). Language and Mathematics - Key Factors influencing the Comprehension Process in reality-based Tasks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1570835 Ma’rufi, Ilyas, M., Salwah, Pasandaran, R. F., & Ikram, M. (2020). Exploration of pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics learning in senior high school based on gender and academic skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1361–1371. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.780399 Maciejewski, W., & Star, J. R. (2016). Developing flexible procedural knowledge in undergraduate calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1148626 Mcgowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or Met-Before ? The effects of previouos experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.08.002 Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2020). Using task-based interviews to generate hypotheses about mathematical practice: mathematics education research on mathematicians’ use of examples in proof-related activities. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 52(6), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01170-w Natsheh, I., & Karsenty, R. (2014). Exploring the potential role of visual reasoning tasks among inexperienced solvers. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0551-1 Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2012). The Splitting Group. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 557. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0557 Paoletti, T., Stevens, I. E., Hobson, N. L. F., Moore, K. C., & LaForest, K. R. (2018). Inverse function: Pre-service teachers’ techniques and meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9787-y Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273662 Rahayuningsih, S., Sirajuddin, S., & Ikram, M. (2021). Using Open-ended Problem-solving Tests to Identify Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.66.8.3 Ramful, A. (2014). Reversible reasoning in fractional situations: Theorems-in-action and constraints. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.002 Ramful, A. (2015). Reversible reasoning and the working backwards problem solving strategy. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 71(4), 28–32. Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Computational thinking, mathematics, and science: Elementary teachers’ perspectives on integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 165–205. Ron, G., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2017). Looking back to the roots of partially correct constructs: The case of the area model in probability. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.10.004 Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of Sstudens’ understanding of the derivate concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9544-y Sevimli, E. (2018). Undergraduates ’ propositional knowledge and proof schemes regarding differentiability and integrability concepts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1052-1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1430384 Simon, M. A., Kara, M., Placa, N., & Sandir, H. (2016). Categorizing and promoting reversibility of mathematical concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9697-4 Sofronas, K. S., DeFranco, T. C., Vinsonhaler, C., Gorgievski, N., Schroeder, L., & Hamelin, C. (2011). What does it mean for a student to understand the first-year calculus? Perspectives of 24 experts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.02.001 Steele, D. F., & Johanning, D. I. (2004). A schematic-Theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047054.90668.f9 Steffe, L., & Olive, J. (2010). Children´s Knowledge, Fractional. Springer. Tunç-Pekkan, Z. (2015). An analysis of elementary school children’s fractional knowledge depicted with circle, rectangle, and number line representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9606-2 Tzur, R. (2007). Fine grain assessment of students’ mathematical understanding: Participatory and anticipatory stagesin learning a new mathematical conception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9082-4 Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series (Issue 9). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203454220