Uso de tecnología digital en la comprensión de parámetros en funciones polinomiales

Referencias

Artigue, M. (2002). “Learning Mathematics in a CAS Enviroment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work”. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 7(3), 245 – 274. Artigue, M. (2007). “Tecnología y enseñanza de las matemáticas: desarrollo y aportaciones de la aproximación instrumental”. Historia y perspectiva de la Educación matemática. Memoria de la XII CIAEM. P. 9 – 21. Arzarello, F. (2004). Mathematical landscapesand their inhabits: perceptions, languages, theories. Plenary Lecture delivered at the ICME 10 Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark. July 4-11, 2004. Bloedy-Vinner, H. (1994). “The analgebraic mode of thinking – The case of parameter”, En Ponte, J. P. y Matos, J.F. (eds), Proccedings of the Eighteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (pp. 82-95). University of Lisbon, Lisbon – Portugal. Bloedy-Vinner, H. (2001). “Beyond Unknowns and variables-parameters and dummy variables in high school algebra”, Em R. Sutherland et al. (eds.), Perspectives on school Algebra (pp.177-189). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Borba, M; y Villareal, M. (2006). Humans – with – Media and the Reorganization of Mathematical Thinking. New York: Springer. D´Amore, B. (2001). Une contribution au débat sur les concepts et les objets mathématiques: la position <> dans une théorie <> contre le modèle <> dans une théorie <>. En A. Gagatsis (Ed.), Learning in Mathematics and Science and Educational Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 131-162). Drijvers, P. (2001). The concept of parameter in a computer algebra enviroment. En H. Chick et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference. The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra. Vol. 1 (pp. 221-227). The University of Melbourne, Australia. Drijvers, P. (2003). The concept of parameter in a computer algebra environment. En M. van den Heuvel- Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol 2 (pp. 385-392). Utrecht, Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute. Duval, R. (1998). Signe et objet, I et II. Annales de didactique et de sciences cognitives, IREM de Strasburg, 6, 139-196. Godino, J.D; y Batanero, C. (1999). The meaning of mathematical objects as analysis units for didactic of mathematics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First Conference of the European Society for Research Mathematics Education. Guin, D y Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into a mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3)195 – 227. Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. En K. Hart (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11-16 (pp. 102 – 119). London: Murray. Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. En A.F. Coxford (Ed.), The ideas of algebra, K-12, 1988 Yearbook of the NCTM (pp. 8-19). Reston, VA: NCTM. Vrillon, R y Rbardel, G (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1): 77 -101.