Tres perspectivas diferentes para mirar el conocimiento del profesor de matemáticas y la enseñanza

Referencias

Ball, D.L. (2000). Bridging practices. Interwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241-247. Ball, D.L., Hill, H.C. y Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14-46 Ball D.L., Thames, M.H. y Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389-407. Brown, T., McNamara, O., Jones, L. y Hanley, U. (1999). Primary student teachers’ understanding of mathematics and its teaching. British Education Research Journal, 25(3), 299-322. Davis B. (2008). Is 1 a prime number? Developing teacher knowledge through concept study. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School (NCTM), 14(2), 86-91. Davis B. (2010). Concept studies: Designing settings for teachers´disciplinary knowledge. In Pinto, M. M. F. & Kawasaki, T. F. (Eds). Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 63-78. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME. Davis B. y Simmt E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137-167. Davis B. y Simmt E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293-319. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. Londres: Croom Helm. Fernandez, C., y Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Glaser, B.G. y Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Goulding, M., Rowland T. y Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees’ subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 28(5), 689-704 Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R., y Hattrup, R.A. (1992). Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Ponte, J.P. y Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practice. In A. Gutierrez y P. Boero (Eds.). Handbook of Research of the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future. (pp. 461-494). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing. Rowland, T. (2008). Researching teachers' mathematics disciplinary knowledge. In P. Sullivan and T. Wood (Eds.) International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Vol.1. Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (pp. 273-298). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Rowland, T., Huckstep P. y Thwaites A. (2005). Elemenatry teachers´ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255-281. Rowland, T y Turner F. (2007). Developing and using the ‘Knowledge Quartet’: A framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107-124. Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4-14. Studying Complexity Science (s.f.). Complexity Sciende Focus. Recuperado el 28 de agosto de 2010 de http://www.complexity.ecs.soton.ac.uk/