Análisis del comportamiento de los estudiantes cuando proponen una definición para una figura geométrica con el apoyo de geometría dinámica

Referencias

Arzarello, F., Micheletti, C., Olivero, F., & Robutti, O. (1998). Dragging in Cabri and modalities of transition form conjectures to proofs in geometry. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22th International Conference (pp. 32–39). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch. Aya, O., Echeverry, A., & Samper, C. (2014). Definición de altura de triángulo: ampliando el espacio de ejemplos con el entorno de geometría dinámica. Tecné, Episteme Y Didaxis: TED., (35), 63–86. Boero, P. (1999). Argumentación y Demostración. Una relación compleja, productiva e inevitable en las Matemáticas y la Educación Matemática. Retrieved from http://www.lettredelapreuve.lt/Newsletter/990708Theme/ES.html Boero, P., Douek, N., Morselli, F., & Pedemonte, B. (2010). Argumentation and proof: A contribution to theoretical perspectives and their classroom implementation. In M. F. F. Pinto & y T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 179–205). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME. Calvo, C. (2001). Un estudio sobre el papel de las definiciones y las demostraciones en cursos preuniversitarios de Cálculo Diferencial e Integral. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Chesler, J. S. U. (2012). Pre-service Secondary Mathematics Teachers Making Sense of Definitions of Functions. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 27–40. De Villiers, M. (1994). Rol y función de una clasificación jerárquica de cuadriláteros. Retrieved from http://www.geometriadinamica.cl/postimg/clascuadv2.pdf De Villiers, M. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define? In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 248–255). Douek, N. (2007). Some remarks about argumentation and proof. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 163–181). Rotterdam, Holanda: Sense Publishers. Douek, N., & Scali, E. (2000). About argumentation and conceptualisation. In Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 249–256). Hiroshima: Nakahara, TadaoKoyama, Masataka. Escudero, I., Gavilán, J., & Sánchez, G. (2014). Una aproximación a los cambios en el discurso matemático generados en el proceso de definir. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación En Matemática Educativa, 17(1), 7–32. Furinghetti, F., & Paola, D. (2002). No Title Defining within a dynamic geometry environment: notes from the classroom. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Mathematical Education (p. pp 392–399). Norwich. Govender, R. (2003). Constructive evaluation of definitions in a Sketchpad context. Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 9, 29–32. Herbst, P., Gonzalez, G., & Macke, M. (2005). How Can Geometry Students Understand What It Means to Define in Mathematics ? The Mathematics Educator, 15(2), 17–24. Hershkowitz, R. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nasher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition : A research synthesis by the International Group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 70–95). 70-95: cambridge U.P. Hoyles, C., & Jones, K. (1998). Proof in Dynamic Geometry Contexts. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.), Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century (pp. 121–128). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Lavy, I. (2004). KINDS OF ARGUMENTS EMERGING WHILE EXPLORING IN A COMPUTERIZED ENVIRONMENT. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 185–192). Bergen: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Leikin, R., & Winicki-Landman, G. (2001). Defining as a Vehicle for Professional Development of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3, 62–73. Linchevski, L., Vinner, S., & Karsenty, R. (1992). To be or not to be minimal? Student teachers’ views about definitions in geometry. In K. Graham (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 48–55). Durham: University of New Hampshire. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. República de Colombia. (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Matemáticas. Potenciar el pensamiento matemático: ¡un reto escolar ! In Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguaje, Matemáticas, Ciencias y Ciudadanas (pp. 46–95). Molina, M., Castro, E., Molina, J., & Castro, E. (2011). Un acercamiento a la investigación de diseño a través de los experimentos de enseñanza. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 29(1), 075–088. Olivero, F. (2003). The Proving Process within a Dynamic Geometry Environment. University of Bristol. Ouvrier-buffet, C. (2004). CONSTRUCTION OF MATHEMATICAL DEFINITIONS : AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL AND DIDACTICAL STUDY. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 473–480). Bergen. Perry, P., Camargo, L., Samper, C., & Rojas, C. (2006). Actividad demostrativa en la formación inicial de profesores de matemáticas (p. 363). Editorial Nomos. Perry, P., Molina, Ó., Camargo, L., & Samper, C. (2011). Analyzing the proving activity of a group of three students. Retrieved from http://www.cerme7.univ.rzeszow.pl/WG/1/Cerme7_WG1_Perry.pdf Perry, P., Samper, C., Camargo, L., & Molina, Ó. (2012). Innovación en un aula de geometría de nivel universitario. In Geometría plana: un espacio de aprendizaje. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Athanasopoulou, A. (2008). The GSP, as a technical-symbolic tool, mediating both geometric conceptualizations and communication. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education. Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 195–214). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–80). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.