Analysis of the underlying cognitive activity in the resolution of a task on derivability of the function f(x)=|x| an approach from two theoretical perspectives

Referencias

Artigue, M., Bartolini-Bussi, M., Dreyfus, T., Gray, E., & Prediger, S. (2005). Different theoretical perspectives and approaches in research in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1239-1243). San Feliu de Guixols, Spain: CERME. Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II (pp. 1-32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2010). Networking of theories?an approach for exploiting the diversity of theoretical approaches. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp.483-506). New York, NY: Springer. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée: registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels [Semiosis and human thought: Semiotic registers and intellectual learning]. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 103-131. Duval, R. (2008). Eight problems for a semiotic approach in mathematics education. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in Mathematics Education: Epistemology, history, classroom and culture (pp. 39-61). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. Eco, U. (1976). Tratado de semiótica general [A theory of semiotics]. Barcelona, Spain: Lumen. Font, V., Godino, J. D., & Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 97-124. Font, V., Trigueros, M., Badillo, E., & Rubio, N. (2016). Mathematical objects through the lens of two different theoretical perspectives: APOS and OSA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(1), 107-122. Godino, J. D., & Batanero, C. (1994). Significado institucional y personal de los objetos matemáticos [Institutional and personal meanings of mathematical objects]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 14(3), 325-355. Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1), 127-135. Godino, J. D., Font, V., Wilhelmi, M., & Lurduy, O. (2011). Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2), 247-265. Hjelmslev, L. (1943). Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Peirce, C. S. (1978). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Pino-Fan, L. (2014). Evaluación de la faceta epistémica del conocimiento didáctico-matemático de futuros profesores de bachillerato sobre la derivada [Evaluation of epistemic facet of didactic-mathematical knowledge of future high school teachers on the derivative function] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Granada, Spain. Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connection theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM, 40(2), 165-178. Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM, 40(2), 317-327. Tsamir, P., Rasslan, S., & Dreyfus, T. (2006). Prospective teachers’ reactions to right-or-wrong tasks: The case of derivatives of absolute value functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(3), 240-251.