Metacognitive skills of malaysian students in non-routine mathematical problem solving

Referencias

ABDULLAH, A. H. et al. Non-routine mathematical problems among in-service and pre-service mathematics teachers. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF TEACHING, ASSESSMENTAND LEARNING (TALE), 2014, Wellington New Zealand. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering: Learning for The Future Now. USA: IEEE, 2014. p. 18-24. ARTZT, A. F.; ARMOUR-THOMAS, E. Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. International Journal of Cognition and Instruction, Lawrence, Kansas, v. 9, n. 2, p. 137-175, 1992. BAYAT, S.; TARMIZI, R. A. Assessing cognitive and metacognitive strategies during algebra problem solving among university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, United Kingdom, v. 8, p. 403-410, 2010. BIRYUKOV, P. Metacognitive aspects of solving combinatorics problem. International Journal in Education Mathematics, Berlin, Germany, v. 74, p. 1-9 mac. 2002. CELEBIOGLU, B.; YAZGAN, Y.; EZENTAS, R. Usage of non-routine problem solving strategies at first grade level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, United Kingdom, v. 2, p. 2968-2974, 2010. CHANG S. C. A. Teacher’s Handbook on Learning Generic Thinking Skills. enter edition number. ed. Singapore: Prentice Hall, 2002. 133 p. CHUA, Y. P. Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. 2. ed. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education, 2008. 373 p. CIASCAI, L.; LAVINIA, H. Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade pupils in romania. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, United Kingdom, v. 29, p. 396–401, 2011. CLEMENTS, D.; COPPLE, C.; HYSON, M. Early childhood mathematics: promoting good beginnings. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), Washington, D.C, v. 17, p. 1-21, 2002. DESOETE, A.; ROEYERS, H.; BUYSSE, A. Metacognition and mathematical problem solving In grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Belgium, v. 34, p. 435-449, 2001. DORNER, D.; WEARING, A. Complex problem solving: toward a (computer-simulated) theory. In: FRENSCH, P. A.; FUNKE, J. (Ed.). Complex Problem Solving: the European Perspective. Hillsdale: Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995. p. 65-99. DUSEK, G.; AYHAN, A. B. A study on problem solving skills of the children from broken family and full parents family attending regional primary boarding school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, United Kingdom, v. 152, p. 137-142, 2014. ELIA, I.; VAN DEN HEUVEL-PANHUIZEN, M.; KOLOVOU. A. Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. International Journal on Mathematics Education, ZDM, Germany, v. 41, p. 605-618, 2009. FORTUNATO, I. et al. Metacognition and problem solving. Arithmetic Teacher, Reston, v. 39, n. 4, p. 38-40, 1991. GARDNER, H. The Unschooled Mind: how children think and how schools should teach. 2. ed. New York: Basic, 1991. 303 p. GHAFAR, M. N. A. Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik. 1. ed. Skudai: Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2003. 268 p. GRAVETTER, F. J.; WALLNAU, L. B. Statistics For The Behavioural Sciences. 9. ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2013. 767 p. HENNESSEY, M. G. metacognitive aspects of students’ reflective discourse: implications for intentional conceptual teaching and learning. In: SINATRA, G. M.; PINTRICH, P. R. (Ed.). Intentional Conceptual Change. Mahwah: Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003. p. 103-132. IMEL, S. Metacognitive Skills for Adult Learning. ERIC Clearing house on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, Center on Education and Training for Employment, College of Education, the Ohio State University, 2002. MARCHIS, I. Non-routine problems in primary mathematics workbooks from Romania. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Romania, v. 5, n. 3, p. 49-56, 2012. JACOBSE, A. E.; HARSKAMP, E. G. Towards Efficient Measurement of Metacognition in Mathematical Problem Solving. Metacognition and Learning, v.7, p. 133–149, 2012. JONASSEN, D. H. Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, USA, v. 48, n. 4, p. 63-85, 2000. KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. Beyond Modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. 1. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995. 239 p. KAZEMI, F.; FADAEE, M. R.; BAYAT, S. A subtle view to metacognitive aspect of Mmathematical problems solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, United Kingdom, v. 8, p. 420-426, 2010. LANDELL, K. Management By Menu. 1. ed. London: Wiley and Sons Inc, 1997. 432 p. LAPORAN PELAN PEMBANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA (PPPM) 2013-2025.Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2012. LEE, J. H. Aplikasi Konsep Fizik dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah yang Berasaskan STEM bagi Pelajar Tingkatan Enam Atas. 276 f. Tesis (Sarjana) - Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 2013. LEE N. H.; CHANG A. S. C.; LEE P.Y. The role of metacognition in the learning of mathematics among low- achieving students. Teaching and Learning, Singapore, v. 22, n. 2, p. 18-30, 2001. LEE, C. et al. Children’s use of meta-cognition in solving everyday problems: children’s monetary decision. Australian Journal of Education, Australia, v. 56, n. 1, p. 22-39, 2012. LEIKIN, R.; LEVAV-WAYNBERG, A. Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks.Educational Studies in Mathematics, Netherlands, v. 66, n. 3, p. 349-371, 2007. LEMBAGA PEPERIKSAAN MALAYSIA (LPM). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2013. MABILANGAN, R. A.; LIMJAP, A. A.; BELECINA, R. R. Problem solving strategies of high school students on non-routine problems: a case study. Alipato: A Journal of Basic Education, Hong Kong, v. 5, p. 23-46, 2011. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MALAYSIA. Integrated curriculum for secondary schools: curriculum specifications mathematics form 4. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre, Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2006. MOHAMAD, N. A.; MAHAMOD, Z. Tahap kemahiran metakognitif murid tingkatan empat dalam pembelajaran bahasa melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. Malay Language Education, v. 4, n. 1, p. 41-47, 2014. MOHAMAD NAJIB A. G. Rekabentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan. 1. ed. Skudai : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2003. 268 p. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS MATHEMATICS. Principle and Standards For School Mathematics. 3. ed. Reston: NCTM, 2000. 402 p. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. 1. ed. Reston: VA, 1989. 258 p. O’NEIL, H. F. JR.; ABEDI, J. Reliability and Validity of State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment. Journal of Educational Research, Washington, D.C., v. 89, n. 4, p. 234- 245, 1996. PANAOURA, A; PHILIPPOU, G. I.; CHRISTOU, C. The Construct Validity of an Inventory for the Measurement of Young Pupils' Metacognitive Abilities in Mathematics. European Research in Mathematics Education lll: group3, Cyprus, v. 3, n. 2003, p. 437-444, 2003. RAHMAN, S.. Hubungan Antara Metakognisi, Motivasi dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Universiti. 275 f. Tesis (Doktor Falsafah) - Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 2004. SCHNEIDER, W.; ARTELT, C. Metacognition and mathematics education. International Journal on Mathematics Education, ZDM, Germany, v. 42, n. 2, p. 149-161, 2010. SCHOENFELD, A. H. Mathematical Problem Solving. 1. ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985. 409 p. SCHOENFELD, A. H. What’s All The Fuss About Metacognition? In:(Ed.). Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Hillsdale: Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987. p. 189- 215. SCHOENFELD, A. H. Learning to think mathematically: problem-solving, metacognition, and sense- making in mathematics. In: GROUWS, D. A. (Ed.). Handbook on Research on Mathematics Teaching & Learning. New York: Ed. Macmillan Publishing Group, 1992. p. 334-370. SCHRAW, G.; DENNISON, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, United States, v.19, n. 4, p. 460-475, 1994. SILVER, E. A. et al. Moving from rhetoric to praxis: issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Oxford, v. 24, n. 3, p. 287-301, 2005. SPADA, M.; GEORGIOU, G.; WELLS, A. The relationship between metacognitions, attentional control and state anxiety. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Abingdon, United Kingdom, v. 39, n. 1, p. 64-71, 2010. STEIN, M. K. et al. Implementing Standards - Based Mathematics Instruction: a casebook for professional development. 1. ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2000. 146 p. TASIR, Z.; HARUN, J.; ZAKARIA, N. W. Tahap kemahiran metakognitif pelajar dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematik. In: SEMINAR KEBANGSAAN PENDIDIKAN SAINS DAN MATEMATIK, 2008, Skudai. Minutes of... Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2008. p. 1-11. VERSCHAFFEL, L. Realistic mathematical modelling and problem solving in the upper elementary school: analysis and improvement. In: HAMERS, J. H. M.; VAN LUIT, J. E. H.; CSAPO, B. (Ed.). Teaching and Learning Thinking Skills: contexts of learning. Lisse: Ed. Swets & Zeitlinger, 1999. p. 215-240. YINGXU, W. Y.; CHIEW, V. On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands, v. 11, n. 1, p. 81-92, 2010. ZAN, R. A metacognition interaction in mathematics at university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, New Jersey, United States, v. 37, n. 1, p. 143- 150, 2000.