Moving beyond descriptive models: research issues for design and implementation

Referencias

Ärlebäck, J. B., & Doerr, H. M. (2015). Preserving students’ independence by encouraging students self-evaluation. In H. Silfverberg, T. Kärki, & M. S. Hannula (Eds.), Proceedings of NORMA14 (pp. 257–266). Turku, Finland: The Finnish Research Association for Subject Didactics. Ärlebäck, J. B., & Doerr, H. M. (2018). Students’ interpretations and reasoning about phenomena with negative rates of change throughout a model development sequence. ZDM Mathematics education, 50(1–2), 187–200. Ärlebäck, J. B., Doerr, H. M., & O’Neil, A. H. (2013). A modeling perspective on interpreting rates of change in context. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 314–336. Barquero, B., Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2013). The ecological dimension in the teaching of mathematical modelling at university. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 33(3), 307–338. Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 73–99). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Doerr, H. M. (2007). What knowledge do teachers need for teaching mathematics through applications and modelling? In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 69–78). New York: Springer. Doerr, H. M, Ärlebäck, J. B., & Stanic, A. C. (2014). Design and effectiveness of modelling-based mathematics in a summer bridge program. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 92–114. Doerr, H. M., Ärlebäck, J. B., & Misfeldt, M. (2017). Representations of modelling in mathematics education. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & G. Kaiser (Eds.). Mathematical modelling and applications. Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education (pp. 71–81). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Doerr, H. M., & English, L. D. (2003). A modeling perspective on students’ mathematical reasoning about data. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 110–136. Doerr, H. M., & Lesh, R. A. (2011). Models and modelling perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics in the twenty-first century. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling, (pp. 247–268). New York: Springer. Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling theory for math and science education. In R. A. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds). Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies. ICTMA 13 (pp. 13–41). New York: Springer. Lesh, R. A., Cramer, K., Doerr, H. M., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. A. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (pp. 35–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.) (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In R. A. Lesh, & A. Kelly (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591– 646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lingefjärd, T., & Meier, S. (2010). Teachers as managers of the modelling process. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 92-107. Maass, K. (2011). How can teachers’ beliefs affect their professional development? ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 573–586. Niss, M. (2015). Prescriptive modelling. Challenges and opportunities. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.). Mathematical modeling in education research and practice. Cultural, social and cognitive influences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.- W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 3–32). New York: Springer. Pollak, H. O. (1979). The interaction between mathematics and other school subjects. New trends in mathematics teaching (Vol. 4, pp. 232–248). Paris: UNESCO. Rosa, M, & Orey, D. (2015). Social-critical dimensions of mathematical modelling. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.). Mathematical modeling in education research and practice. Cultural, social and cognitive influences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Temple, C., & Doerr, H. M. (2012). Developing fluency in the mathematical register through conversation in a tenth-grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 287–306. Wake, G. (2011). Teachers’ professional learning: Modelling at the boundaries. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 653–662). New York: Springer.