The social production of school mathematical thinking

Referencias

APPLE, M. (1995). “Taking power seriously: New directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond”. In: SECADA, W. G., FENNEMA, E. and ADAJIAN, L. B. (eds.). New Directions for Equity in Mathematics Education. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. BALL, S. J. (2002). Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage London, RoutledgeFalmer. BERNSTEIN, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Lanham, Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield. BILLETT, S. (2002). Sociogenesis, Activity and Ontogeny. Culture and Psychology, v. 9, n. 2, pp. 133-169. BOALER, J. (1997). Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex and Setting. Buckingham, Open University Press. BURTON, L. (2001). Research Mathematicians as Learners — and what mathematics education can learn from them. British Educational Research Journal, v. 27, n.5, pp. 589-599. (forthcoming). Mathematicians as Enquirers: Learning about Learning Mathematics Dordrecht, Kluwer. CARREIRA, S.; EVANS, J.; LERMAN, S. and MORGAN, C. (2002). “Mathematical Thinking: Studying the Notion of “Transfer”. In: COCKBURN, A. and NARDI, E. (eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. School of Education and Professional Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. COOPER, B. and DUNNE, M. (1999). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge. Buckingham, Open University Press. DANIELS, H. (ed.) (1993). Charting the agenda: Educational activity after Vygorsky. London, Routledge. DAVIS, P. J. and HERSH, R. (1981). The Mathematical Experience. Brighton, Harvester. GREDLER, M. E. and SHIELDS, C. (2003). Several Bridges Too Far: A Commentary on Richard S. Prawat’s ‘Dewey Meets the ‘Mozart of Psychology’ in Moscow: The Untold Story. American Educational Research Journal, v. 40, n. 1, pp. 177-187. HADAMABRD, J. (1945). The Mathematician’s Mind: The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Boston, Princeton. LERMAN, S. (2000a). “The social turn in mathematics education research”. In: BOALER, J. (ed.). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport, CT, Ablex. (2000b). A case of interpretations of ‘social’: A Response to Steffe & Thompson Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, v. 31, n. 2, pp. 210-227. (2001a). The Function of Discourse in Teaching and Learning Mathematics: A Research Perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v. 46, n. 1-3, pp. 87-113. (2001b). A cultural/discursive psychology for mathematics education research. In: ATWEH, W; FORGASZ, H. & NEBRES, B. (eds.). Socio-cultural aspects in mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. (2001c). “Accounting for accounts of learning mathematics: reading the ZPD in videos and transcripts”. In: CLARKE, D. (ed.). Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Dordrecht, Kluwer. LERMAN, S.; XU, G. and TSATSARONI, A. (2003). Developing theories of mathematics education research: the PME story. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v.51, 0. 1-2, pp. 23-40. LUBIENSKI, S. T. (2001). A second look at mathematics achievement gaps: Intersections of Race, Class and Gender in NAEP Data. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April. MASON, J.; BURTON, L. and STACEY, K. (1982). Thinking Mathematically. Prentice Hall. MATON, K. (2000). Languages of legitimation: the structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims. British Journal of Sociology of Education, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 147-167. MORGAN, C. (1998). Writing Mathematically: The Discourse of Investigation. London, Falmer. MORGAN, C.; TSATSARONI, A. and LERMAN, S. (2002). Mathematics teachers’ positions and practices in discourses of assessment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 443-459. PAPERT, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Brighton, Harvester Press. POLYA, G. (1957). How to Solve It. New York, Anchor. SFARD, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, v.46, n. 1-3, pp. 13-57. SLONIMSKY, L. (1999). Personal communication. September. TSATSARONI, A.; LERMAN, S. and XU, G. (2003). A sociological description of changes in the intellectual field of mathematics education research: Implications for the identities of academics. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April. WERTSCH, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. VYGOTSKY, L. (1986). Thought and Language. Trans. and ed. A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. ZEVENBERGEN, R. (2000). “‘Cracking the Code’ of Mathematics: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background”. In: BOALER, J. (ed.). Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Westport, CT, Ablex.