Competencia de futuros profesores de matemáticas para el análisis de la idoneidad didáctica de una lección sobre proporcionalidad en un libro de texto

Referencias

Ahl, L. M. (2016). Research findings’ impact on the representation of proportional reaso- ning in Swedish Mathematics textbooks. REDIMAT, 5(2), 180–204. https://doi. org/10.17583/redimat.2016.1987 Arias, J., y Maza, S. (2015). Matemáticas, 1º ESO. Código Bruño. Avila, A. (2019). Significados, representaciones y lenguaje: las fracciones en tres genera- ciones de libros de texto para primaria. Educación Matemática, 31(2), 31–59. https:// doi.org/10.24844/EM3102.02 Beyer, C. J., y Davis, E. A. (2012). Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96(1), 130–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20466 Braga, G., y Belver, J. (2016). El análisis de libros de texto: una estrategia metodológica en la formación de los profesionales de la educación. Revista Complutense de Edu- cación, 27(1), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2016.v27.n1.45688 Breda, A., Font, V., y Pino-Fan, L. R. (2018). Criterios valorativos y normativos en la Didác- tica de las Matemáticas: el caso del constructo idoneidad didáctica. Bolema, 32(60), 255–278. http://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v32n60a13 Breda, A., Pino-Fan, L. R., y Font, V. (2017). Meta didactic-mathematical knowledge of teachers: Criteria for the reflection and assessment on teaching practice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1893–1918. https:// doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01207a Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curri- culum materials. En J. T. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, y G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathema- tics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). Routledge. Burgos, M., Beltrán-Pellicer, P., y Godino, J. D. (2020). The issue of didactical suitability in mathematics educational videos: experience of analysis with prospective primary school teachers. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 78(275), 27–49. https://doi. org/10.22550/REP78-1-2020-07 Castillo, M. J., Burgos, M., y Godino, J. D. (2022). Elaboración de una guía de análisis de libros de texto de matemáticas basada en la idoneidad didáctica. Educação e Pes- quisa, 48. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202248238787eng Castro, W. F., y Velásquez, H. (2014). Idoneidad didáctica de la práctica de maestros en formación inicial en un contexto urbano de conflicto social violento. Revista Lati- noamericana de Etnomatemática, 7(3), 33–54. Castro, W.F., Pino-Fan., y Velásquez-Echevarría, H. (2018). A proposal to enhance preser- vice teacher’s noticing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Edu- cation, 14(11), Artículo em1569. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92017 Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: Teachers’ understanding and use of curriculum resources. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 331–353. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10857-011-9170-3 Cohen, L., Manion, L., y Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge. Ercole, L. K., Frantz, M., y Ashline, G. (2011). Multiple ways to solve proportions. Mathe- matics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(8), 482–490. Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Edu- cation, 45(5), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0530-6 Fernández, C., y Llinares, S. (2011). De la estructura aditiva a la multiplicativa: efecto de dos variables en el desarrollo del razonamiento proporcional. Infancia y Aprendiza- je, 34(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037011794390111 Giacomone, B., Godino, J. D., y Beltrán-Pellicer, P. (2018). Developing the prospective mathematics teachers’ didactical suitability analysis competence. Educação e Pes- quisa, 44, Artículo e172011. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201844172011 Godino, J. D. Batanero, C., y Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11858-006-0004-1 Godino, J. D., Batanero, C. Font, V., Contreras, A., y Wilhelmi, M. R. (2016). The theory of didactical suitability: Networking a system of didactics principles for mathematics education form different theoretical perspectives [Comunicación oral, TSG-51]. 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Hamburgo, Alemania. Disponible en http://enfoqueontosemiotico.ugr.es/documentos/ICME13_TSG51_PA_Godino.pdf Godino, J. D., Giacomone, B., Batanero, C., y Font, V. (2017). Enfoque ontosemiótico de los conocimientos y competencias del profesor de matemáticas. Bolema, 31(57), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v31n57a05 Godino, J. D., Rivas, H., Arteaga, P., Lasa, A., y Wilhelmi, M. R. (2014). Ingeniería didáctica basada en el enfoque ontológico - semiótico del conocimiento y la instrucción matemáticos. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 34(2–3), 167–200. Hummes, V., Font, V., y Breda, A. (2019). Combined use of the lesson study and the crite- ria of didactical suitability for the development of the reflection on the own practice in the training of mathematics teachers. Acta Scientiae, 21(1), 64–82. https://doi. org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v21iss1id4968 Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting and children’s thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresema- theduc.24.1.0041 Mason, J. (2016). Perception, interpretation and decision making: Understanding gaps between competence and performance—a commentary. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0764-1 Nicol, C. C., y Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5423-y Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathema- tics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543075002211 Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Bae, M., Enfield, M., y Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping elementary pre-service teachers learn to use science curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345–377. https://doi. org/10.1002/sce.20243 Serradó, A., y P. Azcárate (2003). Estudio de la estructura de las unidades didácticas en los libros de texto de matemáticas para la educación secundaria obligatoria. Educa- ción Matemática, 15(1), 67–98. Shield, M., y Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promo- te deep learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 183–199. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9 Silvestre, A. S., y da Ponte, J. P. (2011). Una experiencia de enseñanza dirigida al desarro- llo del razonamiento proporcional. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 23(59), 137–158. Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Janssens, D., y Verschaffel, L. (2008). The linear imperative: An inventory and conceptual analysis of students’ overuse of linearity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(3), 311–342. Weiland, T., Orrill, C. H., Nagar, G. G., Brown, R. E., y Burke, J. (2021). Framing a robust understanding of proportional reasoning for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Tea- cher Education, 24(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09453-0 Yang, K., y Liu, X. (2019). Exploratory study on Taiwanese secondary teachers’ critiques of mathematics textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), Artículo em1655. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99515