Study of the Effects of a Mathematics Teacher Education Program: What Went Wrong?

Referencias

Antonakis, J. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy impli- cations. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017 .01.006. Cho, J. (1998). Rethinking curriculum implementation: Paradigms, models, and teach- ers’ work. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional develop- ment: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longi- tudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi .org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081. Gertler, P. J., Martínez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2017). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica [Impact assessment in practice]. BID — Banco Mundial. Gómez, P. (2002). Análisis didáctico y diseño curricular en matemáticas [Didactical analysis and curriculum design in mathematics]. Revista EMA, 7(3), 251–293. Gómez, P. (2007). Desarrollo del conocimiento didáctico en un plan de formación inicial de profesores de matemáticas de secundaria [Development of pedagogical knowl- edge in a preservice secondary mathematics teacher education program]. Depar- tamento de Didáctica de la Matemática de la Universidad de Granada. http://funes .uniandes.edu.co/444/. Gómez, P. (Ed.). (2018). Formación de profesores de matemáticas y práctica de aula: conceptos y técnicas curriculares [Training of mathematics teachers and classroom practice: concepts and curricular techniques]. Universidad de los Andes. Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-Process model of teachers’ cog- nition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081. Guskey, T. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51. Karsenty, R. (2021). Implementing professional development programs for mathemat- ics teachers at scale: What counts as success? ZDM — Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1021–1033. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-11021-01250-01255. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102 /0034654315626800. Koichu, B., Aguilar, M. S., & Misfeldt, M. (2021). Implementation-related research in mathematics education: the search for identity. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 53(5), 975–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01302-w. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and proce- dures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to quali- tative research in mathematics education. Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 365–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13. Minor, E. C., Desimone, L., Lee, J. C., & Hochberg, E. D. (2016). Insights on how to shape teacher learning policy: The role of teacher content knowledge in explaining dif- ferential effects of professional development. Education Policy Analysis Archives/ Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 24(61), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507 /epaa.24.2365. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609. Pinzón, A., & Gómez, P. (2023). Effects of a professional development program on teach- ers’ curricular practices [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Universidad de los Andes. Remillard, J., & Heck, D. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics educa- tion. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(3), 641–649. Son, J.-W. (2013). How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student errors: Ratio and proportion in similar rectangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9475-5. Son, J.-W. (2016). Moving beyond a traditional algorithm in whole number subtraction: Preservice teachers’ responses to a student’s invented strategy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9693-8. Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., & Levenson, E. (2015). Fundamental issues concerning the sustain- ment and scaling up of professional development programs. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 47(1), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0665-8. Torres, J. C., & Duque, H. (1994). El proceso de descentralización educativa en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 29, 7–50. https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.5364. Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary-school language teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.4. Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999). First-person methodologies: What, why, how. Journal of Consciousness studies, 6(2–3), 1–14. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.