Study of the Effects of a Mathematics Teacher Education Program: What Went Wrong?
Tipo de documento
Autores
Lista de autores
Pinzón, Andrés y Gómez, Pedro
Resumen
If we want to understand what works in studies of teacher education programs, we also need to understand what does not work. In this article, we discuss why a study evaluating the effects of an education program on implementation practices yielded unexpected results. Interviews with a sample of teacher graduates from the program revealed that the program did have effects on implementation practices that were not evident in the original study. These effects are in the form of increased student participation, teamwork and the conception of error as opportunity. The instrument and procedures of the original study did not allow these effects to be seen.
Fecha
2023
Tipo de fecha
Estado publicación
Términos clave
Enfoque
Nivel educativo
Idioma
Revisado por pares
Formato del archivo
Volumen
3
Rango páginas (artículo)
1-24
ISSN
26670135
Referencias
Antonakis, J. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy impli- cations. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017 .01.006. Cho, J. (1998). Rethinking curriculum implementation: Paradigms, models, and teach- ers’ work. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional develop- ment: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longi- tudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi .org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081. Gertler, P. J., Martínez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2017). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica [Impact assessment in practice]. BID — Banco Mundial. Gómez, P. (2002). Análisis didáctico y diseño curricular en matemáticas [Didactical analysis and curriculum design in mathematics]. Revista EMA, 7(3), 251–293. Gómez, P. (2007). Desarrollo del conocimiento didáctico en un plan de formación inicial de profesores de matemáticas de secundaria [Development of pedagogical knowl- edge in a preservice secondary mathematics teacher education program]. Depar- tamento de Didáctica de la Matemática de la Universidad de Granada. http://funes .uniandes.edu.co/444/. Gómez, P. (Ed.). (2018). Formación de profesores de matemáticas y práctica de aula: conceptos y técnicas curriculares [Training of mathematics teachers and classroom practice: concepts and curricular techniques]. Universidad de los Andes. Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-Process model of teachers’ cog- nition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081. Guskey, T. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51. Karsenty, R. (2021). Implementing professional development programs for mathemat- ics teachers at scale: What counts as success? ZDM — Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1021–1033. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-11021-01250-01255. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102 /0034654315626800. Koichu, B., Aguilar, M. S., & Misfeldt, M. (2021). Implementation-related research in mathematics education: the search for identity. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 53(5), 975–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01302-w. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and proce- dures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to quali- tative research in mathematics education. Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 365–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13. Minor, E. C., Desimone, L., Lee, J. C., & Hochberg, E. D. (2016). Insights on how to shape teacher learning policy: The role of teacher content knowledge in explaining dif- ferential effects of professional development. Education Policy Analysis Archives/ Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 24(61), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507 /epaa.24.2365. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609. Pinzón, A., & Gómez, P. (2023). Effects of a professional development program on teach- ers’ curricular practices [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Universidad de los Andes. Remillard, J., & Heck, D. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics educa- tion. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(3), 641–649. Son, J.-W. (2013). How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student errors: Ratio and proportion in similar rectangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9475-5. Son, J.-W. (2016). Moving beyond a traditional algorithm in whole number subtraction: Preservice teachers’ responses to a student’s invented strategy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9693-8. Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., & Levenson, E. (2015). Fundamental issues concerning the sustain- ment and scaling up of professional development programs. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 47(1), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0665-8. Torres, J. C., & Duque, H. (1994). El proceso de descentralización educativa en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 29, 7–50. https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.5364. Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary-school language teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.4. Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999). First-person methodologies: What, why, how. Journal of Consciousness studies, 6(2–3), 1–14. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Documentos relacionados
Foro EMAD 2023: Sesión de preguntas y respuestas del panel 2
- Deulofeu, Jordi, Mejía, Juan Pablo, Villa-Ochoa, Jhony
- Aprendizaje, Cognición, Contenido, Enseñanza
- Educación media bachillerato secundaria superior (16 a 18 años), Educación primaria escuela elemental (6 a 12 años), Educación secundaria básica (12 a 16 años), Educación superior formación de pregrado formación de grado, Todos los niveles educativos